R.R. Construction Vs. Cce

R.R. Construction vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Sep 28, 2007

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/46228

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/46228
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: R Abichandani
Decided On: Sep 28, 2007
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.R. Construction

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

1. an obvious mistake has crept in, in the order dt. 24.7.07, by which it was directed that the applicant should deposit rs. 3,50,000 (rupees three lakhs and fifty thousand only) @ rs. 100/- per day being penalty imposed under section 76 for a period of about 11 months. the said amount payable would be about rs. 35,000/- but was typed as rs. 3,50,000/- in the stay order. the words rs. 3,50,000/- (rs. three lakhs and fifty thousand only) are, therefore, ordered to be substituted by the words "rs. 35,000/-(rupees thirty five thousand only). the order stands rectified accordingly. the time to make the deposit of rs. 35,000/- is extended by two weeks. this application stands disposed of accordingly. to come up for reporting compliance on 22.10.07.

Full Judgment

1. An obvious mistake has crept in, in the order dt. 24.7.07, by which it was directed that the applicant should deposit Rs. 3,50,000 (rupees three lakhs and fifty thousand only) @ Rs. 100/- per day being penalty imposed under Section 76 for a period of about 11 months. The said amount payable would be about Rs. 35,000/- but was typed as Rs. 3,50,000/- in the stay order. The words Rs. 3,50,000/- (Rs. three lakhs and fifty thousand only) are, therefore, ordered to be substituted by the words "Rs. 35,000/-(rupees thirty five thousand only). The order stands rectified accordingly. The time to make the deposit of Rs. 35,000/- is extended by two weeks. This application stands disposed of accordingly. To come up for reporting compliance on 22.10.07.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties R.R. Construction vs Cce Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge R Abichandani