Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 3621 Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.081 seconds)Chicago and Eastern Illinois R. Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-02-1963
we find are in violation of the interstate commerce act section 10 e of the administrative procedure act provides that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.D. Jayaveerapandia Nadar Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-08-1963
Reported in: (1964)1MLJ201
whether in the limited jurisdiction which this court possesses under section 66 of the indian income tax act the collection of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundaram Finance Limited Vs. the State of Kerala and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-05-1963
Reported in: [1964]15STC228(Ker)
motor vehicles act 1939 the expression owner is defined in section 2 19 of that act and under that definition the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Mohammed Vs. K.C. Raman and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-04-1963
Reported in: 1964CriLJ100
the court from examining the witnesses as court witnesses under section 540 cr pcthe order is set aside the learned magistrate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Chandramani Shanker Jadhavlal Sanghvi and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-06-1963
Reported in: AIR1963Guj243; (1963)GLR943
6 and order 9 rule 7 c p code and section 22 of the limitation act but it is not necessary
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHanumantta Ramchandra Vs. the State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: May-02-1963
Reported in: (1963)4GLR1031
v b raju j 1 the appellant was convicted under section 66 b of the bombay prohibition acts according to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.V. Manicka Mudaliar Vs. V.M. Thangavelu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-09-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Mad35
the two questions raised in consequence of a reference under section 66 of the indian income tax act were as follows
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Madras Vs. Murray and Co. and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-1963
Reported in: AIR1965Mad301
generally and imposing certain restrictions on vehicular traffic over the section of the mount road referred to earlier the notification inter
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Sangarmal Sowcar Vs. K. Murugesa Naicker
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-26-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Mad77
not enough to discharge the entire loan he relied on section 176 of the indian contract act he further reiterated that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRukmani Ammal Vs. N. Venkatarama Iyer and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-01-1963
Reported in: AIR1964Mad281
mortgagor and the mortgagee the argument indeed runs counter to sections 92 and 95 of the transfer of property act it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial