Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 3621 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 36,338 results (0.225 seconds)M.S. Suresh Vs. Smt. Parvathi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-17-2005
Reported in: ILR2005KAR1274; 2005(3)KarLJ386
orderk l manjunath j 1 an interesting question that arise for consideration in these writ petition is whether the mother...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAndhra Cements Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-21-2005
Reported in: (2005)(191)ELT1046Tri(Bang.)
the duty demand of rs 2 17 89 099 under section 11 a of central excise act 1944 the imposed equal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandan Tubes and Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-24-2005
Reported in: (2006)(193)ELT48Tri(Mum.)bai
that case to have misguided himself in thinking that under section 108 of the customs act 1962 a witness necessary for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTecumseh Products India (P) Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-23-2005
Reported in: (2006)(193)ELT87Tri(Bang.)
reduced the penalty from rs 86 39 756 imposed under section 11ac to rs 50 lakhs and from rs 1 lakh
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommr. of C. Ex. Vs. Olympic Synthetic Sacks Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-23-2005
Reported in: (2005)(188)ELT90Tri(Mum.)bai
period 1989 90 to 25 5 92 of interest under section 11bb c on considering that tapes are an intermediate goods
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnk Seals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-23-2005
duty calculated accordingly in such a situation the provisions of section 154 of the customs act 1962 will apply for ready
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFlex-o-packaging and Shri B.S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-21-2005
Reported in: (2005)(192)ELT661Tri(Mum.)bai
as the job worker doing the job of assembling the section on behalf of muz should not be reason to deny
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPritam Singh Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-22-2005
Reported in: (2005)(189)ELT70TriDel
sustained that being so no penalty against the appellants under section 114 of the customs act can be also sustained therefore
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Plastomers Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-20-2005
the issue involved the penalty imposed on the appellants under section 76 of the service tax when the tax had been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Jyoti Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-28-2005
Reported in: (2005)(188)ELT88TriDel
issued after limitation period of six months and proviso to section 28 was invoked in view of the fact that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial