Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 3621 Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 24,036 results (0.089 seconds)Krone Communications Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jan-01-1999
Reported in: (1999)LC682Tri(Chennai)
wire had been given without any description of the cross sectional diameter and also of those falling under various sub headings
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPepsico India Holdings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-1999
Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC813
and a penalty of the same amount was imposed under section 11 ac of the central excise act 1944 3 we
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGautham Const. and Fisheries Pvt. Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-24-1999
Reported in: (2000)(118)ELT301Tri(Chennai)
4 50 000 besides penalty of rs 1 lakh under section 112 a of the customs act 1962 and another penalty
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDcl Polyester Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-1999
Reported in: (2000)LC792Tri(Delhi)
schedule but their assessable value has to be determined under section 4 the collector has also mentioned in the impugned order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasti Sugar Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-1999
Reported in: (2000)LC602Tri(Delhi)
the appellants so as to treat them as manufacturer under section 2 f of the central excise act the appellants have
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWeston Components Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-1999
Reported in: (2000)(118)ELT199TriDel
goods and under the impugned order confiscated the goods under section 111 m of customs act 1962 with a redemption fine
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOwens Brockway (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-20-1999
Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT663Tri(Mum.)bai
other dealers which sales would have determined the valuation under section 4 1 a obviating the need to go to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShree Satpuda Tapi Parisar Ssk Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-1999
Reported in: (1999)(114)ELT332TriDel
the definition of the word mine in clause j of section 2 of the mines act 1952 following is the finding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPl Agro Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-19-1999
Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC167
it is governed by a different procedure of refund under section 11b and also governed by the aspect pertaining to unjust
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMittal Containers (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-25-1999
Reported in: (2000)(117)ELT741TriDel
not imposed on them under rule 57 1 read with section ha and rule 173q of the rules the appellants contested
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial