Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 3621 Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.05 seconds)
Jan 02 1998 (TRI)

Mohammed Hanifa Fawzul Ameer Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jan-02-1998

Reported in: (1998)(59)ECC354

of rs 1 00 000 rupees one lakh only under section 112 a of the customs act 1962 on shri mohamed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Paper Products Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)LC307Tri(Delhi)

duty of rs 43 93 220 under the proviso to section 11a 1 of the central excises amp salt act 1944

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 1998 (TRI)

Allied Chemicals Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-27-1998

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT156TriDel

payment of duty so as to attract the proviso to section 11a of the central excise act 1944 we therefore agree

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 1998 (TRI)

Eureka Forbes Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-28-1998

Reported in: (1999)LC303Tri(Delhi)

of refund will however be subject to the provisions of section 11b 2 of central excise act 1944

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 1998 (TRI)

Siddharth Engineering Works Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-27-1998

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT451TriDel

e l t 666 in the case of trigan metal sections has been relied upon by the adjudicating authority to support

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 24 1998 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Great Oasis Enterprises (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-24-1998

Reported in: (1999)(82)LC629Tri(Mum.)bai

ltd will be the assessable value for the purpose of section 4 of central excise act 1944 hence this appeal by

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Mafatlal Plywood Ind. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC120

according to the terms of the heading and any relative section or chapter notes therefore the collector appeals does not give

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 1998 (TRI)

Pharmchem Traders Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-23-1998

Reported in: (1998)(104)ELT777Tri(Mum.)bai

shri jitendra avlani which was sought to be confiscated under section lll d and lll p of the customs act 3

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1998 (TRI)

Brytex Auto Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-21-1998

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT794TriDel

manufacture of final products in terms of the provisions of section aa of chapter v of the said rules the credit

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 30 1998 (TRI)

Dass and Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-30-1998

Reported in: (1999)(105)ELT154TriDel

l t 473 cal in which it was held that sections 11a and 11b of the central excises and salt act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //