Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results

Lopez Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... eighth circuit reversed bellis v davis 186 f 3d 1092 1999 section 3621 e 2 b the court of appeals observed states only that ..... exercise of the bop s discretion under 3621 e 2 b pp 238 245 a section 3621 e 2 b gives the bop discretion ..... legislators use of a mandatory shall in the very same section elsewhere in 3621 congress used shall to impose discretionless obligations including the obligation .....

Setser Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is to make the concurrent vs consecutive decision after the federal sentence has been imposed section 3621 b from which the bureau claims to derive this authority says nothing about concurrent or ..... says nothing about concurrent or consecutive sentences but the government explains its position as follows section 3621 b gives the bureau the authority to order that a prisoner serve his federal sentence .....

Aicardi Vs. State

Court: US Supreme Court

..... allow gaming are to be construed strictly the revised code of alabama section 3621 in force before and in the year 1868 enacts that any person ..... be made at their office in the city of mobile amp c section 2 that before commencing business under the provisions of this act ..... a table for gaming the legislature did not intend to repeal this section of the code by the law allowing the formation of this .....

Hauge Vs. City of Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

..... produce or other article or articles of merchandise is removed from the vehicle footnote 2 section 3621 public weighmasters when not the owners or sellers of the articles commodities or produce ..... appointment as weighmaster of any one owning scales under prescribed conditions and section 36212 fixes permissible charges section 36233 directs in no case shall any public weighmaster state in his .....

V. Gangaram Vs. Regional Joint Director and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2776; JT1997(5)SC385; 1997(4)SCALE92; (1997)6SCC139; [1997]3SCR1043

hardship 8 the appeal is accordingly disposed of no costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Malhotra Steel Syndicate Vs. Punjab Chemi-plants Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1993)BC177(SC); 1993Supp(3)SCC565

allowed accordingly there will be no order as to costs section 11 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj res judicata

Ved Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC77; 1988(36)BLJR77; JT1987(4)SC121; 1988LabIC331; 1987(2)SCALE795a; (1987)4SCC584; 1988(1)LC169(SC)

retire the petitioner the special leave petition therefore is dismissed section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

State of Haryana Vs. Naresh Kumar Bali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1994(4)SC184; (1995)IILLJ108SC; 1994(2)SCALE1105; (1994)4SCC448; 1994(2)LC226(SC)

have indicated above accordingly the appeal is allowed no costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

The Krishnakumar Mills Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC172; 1971(III)LC278(SC)

is dismissed there will be no order as to costs section 6 dr arijit pasayat asok kumar ganguly jj suit for

Durga Das Vs. the Collector and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2786; 1996(6)SCALE199; (1996)5SCC618; [1996]Supp4SCR370

be discharged 4 the appeal is accordingly dismissed no costs section 7 dr arijit pasayat d k jain dr mukundakam sharma