Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 3621 Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 26,673 results (0.08 seconds)
Oct 30 2000 (FN)

Lopez Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-30-2000

..... eighth circuit reversed bellis v davis 186 f 3d 1092 1999 section 3621 e 2 b the court of appeals observed states only that ..... exercise of the bop s discretion under 3621 e 2 b pp 238 245 a section 3621 e 2 b gives the bop discretion ..... legislators use of a mandatory shall in the very same section elsewhere in 3621 congress used shall to impose discretionless obligations including the obligation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 2000 (HC)

Khokhan Chandra Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-14-2000

..... doubts that both the accused appellants have committed the offence punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act 6 there is no merit ..... the accused persons have been convicted under section 7 of the essential commodities act and sentenced to undergo r ..... and order dated 8th may 1995 passed in g r case no 3621 86 by the special judge e c act dhanbad whereby both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 2000 (HC)

D.B. Kingsley Vs. Shoba Viswanathan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-10-2000

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ59

..... directed in the abovesaid civil revision petitions that the petition filed under section 11 4 of the act by the respondent herein against the ..... exemption granted bases on quantum of monthly rent for residential buildings under section 30 ii of the tenancy act was struck down by the ..... to the city civil court madras and renumbered as o s no 3621 of 1996 on the file of the city civil court madras .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 2000 (TRI)

Vinod Metal Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-04-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT185Tri(Mum.)bai

leviable under said schedule or the additional duty leviable under section 3 of the customs tariff act has already been paid

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Ranger Breweries Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-08-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT447TriDel

active there cannot be any manufacture within the meaning of section 2 f of the central excise act and reliance was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2000 (TRI)

Burman Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-08-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT52TriDel

wholesale dealers should form the price for assessable value under section 4 of the central excises and salt act 1944 duty

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 2000 (TRI)

Dhanalakshmi Steels Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC535

rolling steel mills annual capacity determination rules 1997 and also section 35b 1 of the central excise rules this is the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 2000 (TRI)

Bharat Seats Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT149TriDel

of automobile seats and penalty of equal amount imposed under section 11ac of the central excise act the learned senior counsel

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. U.P. Steels

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT693TriDel

the duty amount of rs 72502 69 under proviso to section 11 a of the central excises act 1944 for having

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Chamundeswari Steel Rolling

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-04-2000

Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT171TriDel

collector appeals that extended period of limitation as provided under section 11a of the central excise act is not invokable inasmuch

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //