Section 3621 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 3621 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 304 results (0.737 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss were to be filed of course
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
point was raised whether taking cognizance of the offences under sections 3 and 4 of the land grabbing act and sections
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court: Karnataka
a result the appeal filed by respondent no 2 under section 16 is not maintainable any further actions would be purely
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
he desires and it would not attract the offence under section 109 of ipc nor it amounts to an abetment under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court: Karnataka
framed by the central government in exercise of powers under section 176 1 c of the rules and framing of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
identity under section 6 or a revised certificate under sub section 2 shall be entitled to change the first name in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court: Karnataka
the i a no 2 under order xxxix rule4r w section151of cpc dismissing the i a no 3 under order xxxix
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court: Karnataka
to arcil 9 pursuant to the assignment in terms of section 5 4 of the sarfaesi act arcil being entitled to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court: Karnataka
and issued a notice in terms of subsection 2 of section 13 of the sarfaesi act and in terms of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court: Karnataka
attaching the properties belonging to the respondent no 2 under section 3 2 of the kpidfe act as the respondent no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial