Remove - Judgment Search Results

Daugherty Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

daugherty v florida 488 u s 936 1988 u s supreme court daugherty v florida 488 u s 936 1988...

Vidyacharan Shukla Vs. B.S. Adityan

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1989KAR2784

..... itself that bars either specificallyor by implication exercise of authority by the generalassembly to remove some one from office before thescheduled annual elections for the purpose of electingoffice ..... enunciation therein reads although statutory or charter provisions have generally been enacted for the removal of municipal or other public officers it is generally considered that a municipal .....

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operation Housing Society Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(3)BomCR238

..... it was very common on courts of equity to entertain suits for the purpose of removing could resting upon the plaintiff s title this was done upon the ground that it .....

Carneigie-mellon Univ. Vs. Cohill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the dissent page 484 u s 348 countered that thermtron s admonition against remanding removed cases to state court without specific statutory authorization did not extend to cases involving ..... ground that plaintiffs like the boyles would otherwise protect themselves against the combination of removal dismissal under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine and the expiration of a statute of limitations by .....

Morrison Vs. Olson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... unduly trammel on executive authority the congressional determination to limit the attorney general s removal power was essential in congress view to establish the necessary independence of the ..... that the constitution prevents congress from imposing limitations on the president s power to remove all executive officials simply because they wield executive power myers itself expressly distinguished .....

Carlucci Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... nationals his employment was terminated pursuant to nsa personnel regulations setting forth procedures for removal for cause which were promulgated under provisions of the national security agency act of ..... declares that even though other statutes might not permit it the secretary may authorize removals pursuant to 7532 procedures rather than those governing terminations under other laws this .....

Department of the Navy Vs. Egan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... unlikely congress intended respondent s argument that the availability of the alternative 7532 summary removal procedure compels a conclusion of reviewability since an anomalous situation would otherwise exist ..... whereby the more drastic 7532 remedy would actually entitle a removed employee to greater procedural protections particularly to a preremoval trial type hearing than .....

Ross Vs. Oklahoma

Court: US Supreme Court

..... motion and huling was provisionally seated the defense then exercised its sixth peremptory challenge to remove huling the defense ultimately used all nine of its challenges the prosecution used only five ..... petitioner points out that had he not used his sixth peremptory challenge to remove huling he could have removed another juror including one who ultimately sat on the jury petitioner asserts .....

Bi-metal Bearings Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1989)(22)LC417Tri(Chennai)

..... hosur was done under complete documentation over the years thus precluding any charge of clandestine removal and following the ratio of these judgments the longer period under rule 9 2 cannot ..... appellants the plea that the goods in question were periodically regularly and systematically cleared and removed from their factory at madras and taken to their other manufacturing units hundreds of miles .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1988(18)ECC108

..... be deposited without payment of duty from where such goods are removed c related person means a person who is so associated with ..... the normal practice of the wholesale trade at the time of removal in respect of such goods sold or contracted for sale explanation ..... price of any excisable goods for delivery at the place of removal is not known and the value thereof is determined with reference .....