Remove - Judgment Search Results

Varkey Varkey Vs. N.M. Kurian and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1982Ker222

u l bhat j 1 the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration that plaint items nos 1 to 3...

Debi Prasad Bagaria and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1982Cal587

..... to be a properly constituted managing committee of the school they are sought to be removed on certain allegations without giving them an opportunity of being heard in my opinion this .....

T.G. Srinivasa Murthy, Etc., Etc. Vs. Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. Etc., E ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1982KAR622; (1982)ILLJ268Kant

..... laws the unlimited authority of the chief executive in public office to appoint and remove subordinate officials which prevailed throughout this country during the first century of its existence ..... art 311 2 and the relevant rules governing disciplinary proceedings for imposing penalties of removal or dismissal from service and iii the exceptions to the aforesaid procedure incorporated under .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... when the conditions required an appointment to be made means in substance his removal to remove a permanent judge the prescribed procedure must be followed and the allerations against ..... being restricted by social and economic constraints it is necessary to democratise judicial remedies remove technical barriers against easy accessibility to justice and promote public interest litigation so that .....

Arizona Vs. Manypenny

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to a grant of equivalent federal jurisdiction at the appellate level because the criminal removal statute does not confer federal appellate jurisdiction some independent federal basis is required if ..... maintained that the state of arizona and therefore the united states district court on removal had no criminal jurisdiction over the federal land where the shooting occurred respondent further .....

Federated Department Stores, Inc. Vs. Moitie

Court: US Supreme Court

..... federal law claims into state law claims and held that respondent s complaint was properly removed because it concerned federal questions which could have been originally brought in federal district ..... emphasis in original citation omitted the federal court must therefore scrutinize the complaint in the removed case to determine whether the action though ostensibly grounded solely on state law is .....

Ramchandra S/O Tukaram Choudhari Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1982(2)BomCR205

..... registered an offence against the appellant and conducted the investigation the injured pralhad was later removed to the akola general hospital for operation 7 after the completion of the investigation ..... 3 from his police statement wherein he had stated that parvata prevented chimanaji from removing the articles several other minor contradictions regarding the sequence of things have been brought .....

Basamma and ors. Vs. Peerappa

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1982Kant9; ILR1981KAR1230; 1981(1)KarLJ286

..... for subject to the condition that they should not cut and remove the crops until further orders of the court the former should ..... lands and thereafter she and her man defendant 2 and 3 removed the various standing crops and other materials by disobeying the court ..... not legally entitled and caused other damages to the plaintiff the removal of standing crops and other materials from the suit land and .....

Triveni Sheet Glass Works Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1983(12)ELT711(All)

..... the duty due on the excisable goods intended to be removed and to remove the goods on payment of duty so determined by ..... shows that normally assessment of duty is obligatory before every removal of manufactured goods however the central government evolved a special ..... officer assessed the duty payable by them under rule 52 remove excisable goods after themselves determining and paying the amount of .....

Jathedar Jagdev Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1982P& H16

..... xxx xxxremoval of members 15 the state government may by notification remove any member if in its opinion he has been guilty of ..... and in its real sense in equivalent to its supersession or removal followed by the constitution of a new board later one has ..... particular reference to sub section 5 thereof with regard to the removal of the chairman and the members of the board constituted under .....