Remove - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kodandarama and Company ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1983]144ITR395(AP)

jeevan reddy j 1 the assessee in these five referred cases are dealers in paddy rice broken rice etc in...

Alok Kumar Aich Vs. Asoke Kumar Aich and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1982Cal599

..... the execution of a will is shrouded in suspicion the propounder must lead evidence to remove such suspicions and satisfy the conscience of the court that the will was duly executed .....

island Trees Sch. Dist. Vs. Pico by Pico

Court: US Supreme Court

..... any statement of reasons for doing so finally while petitioners originally defended their removal decision with the explanation that these books contain obscenities blasphemies brutality and ..... plurality suggests that the constitution distinguishes between school libraries and school classrooms between removing unwanted books and acquiring books even more extreme the plurality concludes that .....

Santosky Vs. Kramer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... york family court for ulster county terminated petitioners parental rights as to the three children removed in 1974 or earlier this termination was preceded by a judicial finding that petitioners had ..... ulster county department of social services department to take custody of the three children temporary removal of the children was continued at an evidentiary hearing held before the family court in .....

Umasankar Chatterjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1982)IILLJ378Cal

..... petition in this court challenging the validity of the order of removal and the order of the board of directors dismissing the appeal ..... chandra bose learned counsel for the corporation that the order of removal became effective the moment it was put into the post box ..... by the learned counsel that even assuming that the order of removal or dismissal becomes effective only when it is served on the .....

Merrion Vs. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... under the most solemn obligation and for which it has received ample consideration to remove and keep removed from the territory of these tribes all this class of intruders who are there ..... the tribe could prevent such nonmembers from doing business regardless of whether it could physically remove them from the reservation moreover in that same chapter on tribal self government cohen recognizes .....

Northern Pipeline Vs. Marathon Pipe Line

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rights our precedents clearly establish that only controversies in the former category may be removed from art iii courts and delegated to legislative courts or administrative agencies for their ..... grant of jurisdiction could not constitutionally encompass this and similar claims it would simply remove the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court over these matters leaving the jurisdictional provision and .....

Union of India Vs. Mehta Teja Singh and Co.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1983Delhi297; 23(1982)DLT170

..... the argument is that the contract with the present respondent envisaged the removal of soil to a distance not exceeding 440 yards and for ..... ssr the third step in the argument is that since the contractor removed the soil to a distance not exceeding fifty yards for which ..... rates in the present contract depending upon the distance involved in such removal as seems to be found in the ssr sri watwani is .....

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Bio-drug Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1987(27)ELT394(Cal)

..... is renewed from year to year 21 for the purpose of removal of dutiable goods from the manufactory the respondent has to ..... retained by him in accordance with the said procedure the respondent removed dutiable goods from its manufactory during the period from 1st ..... no allegation in the instant case that the respondent had clandestinely removed the goods from its manufactory on the contrary it is not .....

V.C. Cheriyan and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1982CriLJ2071

..... shortly afterwards the first accused shouted in protest against the removal of the obstruction and approaching the scene of incident stabbed ..... owner though not in actual possession at the time to remove the obstruction even by using necessary force explaining the expression ..... were unarmed nevertheless they were committing trespass and mischief by removing the barricade put across the road 15 no offence .....