Skip to content


Remove - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: remove Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 913 results (0.024 seconds)
Feb 22 1983 (HC)

Lanka Sharma Vs. Rajendra Singh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-22-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC62

p a choudhary j 1 this appeal is filed by the claimant in o p no 346 of 1978 on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 1983 (HC)

Krishnan Nair Sreedharan Nair Vs. Oommoommen Abraham

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-17-1983

Reported in: AIR1984Ker164

k s paripoornan j 1 the defendant in o s 193 of 1977 of the munsiff s court mavalikkara is...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 1983 (HC)

B.K. Shrestha Vs. Commissioner of Police

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-29-1983

Reported in: 25(1984)DLT146

r n aggarwal j 1 on 6th june 1980 the golden tobacco company limited and sikkim tobacco pvt ltd registered...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 1983 (TRI)

Mahabir Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-31-1983

Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT477TriDel

..... of other high courts regarding the interpretation of the terms removed and removal with reference to rules 9 and 49 of the ..... the first ground namely that captive consumption would not constitute removal shri khaitan has advanced a number of interesting arguments as ..... fabrics they contended that since none of these articles was removed from the factory premises but was used for captive consumption .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 24 1983 (FN)

Franchise Tax Bd. Vs. Construction Laborers

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-24-1983

..... statutes federal courts do not have original jurisdiction nor do they acquire jurisdiction on removal when a federal question is presented by a complaint for a state declaratory judgment ..... judgment actions as well if federal district courts could take jurisdiction either originally or by removal of state declaratory judgment claims raising questions of federal law without regard to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 1983 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Kishorchandra Ajitrai Chhaya

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-03-1983

Reported in: 1985CriLJ392

..... contended on behalf of the respondents the legislature has deliberately departed from the expression removable from office employed in section 48 and instead used an innocent expression discontinuance in ..... this contention is absolutely misconceived if we accept this contention the procedure prescribed for removing the chief officer under section 48 would be frustrated when the legislature has laid .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 1983 (HC)

Shankar Shetteppa Chougule Vs. Shivaputra Shankarappa Shairakoli

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-08-1983

..... want of confidence and therefore they being not public servants not removable from office save by or with the sanction of the ..... his duties as a councillor provided that no councillor shall be removed except after being afforded an opportunity for submitting an explanation 2 ..... government while under section 41 of the act the government may remove the councillor elected or appointed under the act on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1983 (FN)

Watt Vs. Western Nuclear, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-06-1983

..... then notified respondent and later determined after a hearing that the removal of the gravel constituted a trespass in violation of a ..... blm served western nuclear with a notice that the extraction and removal of the gravel constituted a trespass against the united states ..... with by the reservation of minerals and the prospecting for a removal of same from the land based on similar concerns the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 1983 (HC)

Ramesh Bhauraoji and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-23-1983

Reported in: II(1984)ACC40

..... meeting of the corporation provided that no member nominated by the central government shall be removed from office without the concurrence of that government it would appear that under old section ..... 8 the state government was empowered to remove chairman or member in the two contingencies specified therein 5 the amendment act introduced certain .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 1983 (TRI)

Raipur Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-02-1983

Reported in: (1983)LC1004DTri(Delhi)

..... attracts duty therefore if on the date when the goods are removed from the place of manufacture they are specified in the central ..... excise tariff schedule they cannot be removed unless duty is paid on them even though such goods may ..... case is whether duty on the subject yarn which admittedly was removed from the place of its manufacture within the factory to another .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //