Remove - Judgment Search Results
Pacific Railroad Removal Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-04-1885
organized under acts of Congress, are entitled, under the Act of March 3, l875, 18 Stat. 470, to remove into the circuit court of the United States suits brought against them in state courts on the ground
Removal Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1879
in which there shall be a controversy between citizens of different states, . . . either party may remove said suit into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district" construed and held to
Samad vs Rajalekshmi (Removed)*
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-31-2024
K.P AGED 33 YEARS ,DEVAKI NIVAS, KARIYATHANKUZHIYIL P.O KOODARANJI,KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673001 [*REMOVED] *[Respondents 1 and 2 are removed from the party array at the risk of the petitioners as per order dated 31.1.2024 in R.P.No.384/2023] 3
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shyni vs Ommen Mathew(Removed)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-11-2023
(REMOVED) W/O.K. SUDHAKRAN, PUTHANTHARA HOUSE, MUKKOOTHUTHARA, RANNY. 4 BRANCH MANAGER ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., RANNY.(RESPONDENT 1 AND 3 ARE REMOVED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE PETITIONER AS PER ORDER DATED 02/02/2021 IN IA 2/2020
Sarva Shramik Sanghatana Vs. M/S. Interim International Removals Divis ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
NO.5449 OF2016(Arising out of SLP ( C) No.34742 of 2015) SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHATANA APPELLANT VERSUS M/S. INTERIM INTERNATIONAL REMOVALS DIVISION OF FREIGHT SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT KURIAN,J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is before this Court
N.S.Ismail (Removed) vs Vibin a.P.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-17-2023
SKYLINE APARTMENTS, FLAT NO.101, KANJIKUZHY, KOTTAYAM. (NAME AND ADDRESS OF POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER REPRESENTING THE APPELLANT IS REMOVED FROM THE CAUSE TITLE AS PER ORDER DATED 26.07.2023 IN IA 1/2023 IN MACA 2166/2011). BY ADVS. T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN
Girish Chandra Singh Son of Late Kanhaiya Singh Sub-inspector (Grp) (R ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)AWC906; [2008(116)FLR599]
of same enquiry report dated 11.6.2004 was issued to the petitioner as to why he should hot be removed from service as his conduct on account of his living with alleged second wife Smt-Usha Singh is unbecoming
State of A.P. Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-op. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-22-2010
Reported in: 2010(3)ALT17
his previous employment service certificate and having issued appointment orders, it is not open for the petitioners to remove the applicant from service for no fault of him.6. Admittedly, the applicant was selected and appointed by the
Randhir Singh, Sarpanch (Removed), Gram Panchayat Vs. State of Haryana ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-18-1997
Reported in: (1998)118PLR450
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The petitioner a Sarpanch-complains that he was arbitrarily removed from his office Under Section 51(3) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. Brief facts may be noticed.In
Chinnathorai Pillai Vs. Rao Bahadur M.R. Govinda Rao (Since Removed fr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-1927
Reported in: (1927)53MLJ306
1. The plaintiff-respondent is the manager of the Piranmalai Devasthanam. He instituted a suit to recover rent in respect of certain lands belonging to the Devasthanam which were granted on a permanent lease at a favourable...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free