Remove - Judgment Search Results

Toshiba Anand Batteries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1986)(10)ECC256

1 the dispute is whether a single dry cell manufactured by m s toshiba anand betteries is a dry battery...

Banshidhar Panda Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cuttack

Reported in: (1986)16ITD324Ctk

1 this appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 2 3 1983 of the commissioner appeals...

Yelukuru Satyanarayana Setty Vs. Gift-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1986)18ITD345(Hyd.)

1 shri yelukuru satyanarayana setty settled the house property valued at rs 97 000 through a settlement deed dated 10...

Madhumathi Vs. Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1987(14)ECC170

ordermohan j 1 the writ petition is for habeas corpus under the following circumstances information was received by the madras...

Digambar Sakharm Tambolkar and anr. Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1987Bom297; 1987(1)BomCR43; 1987MhLJ419

sugla j 1 by this petition under art 226 227 of the constitution of india the petitioners have challenged the...

Bowsher Vs. Synar

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reduction process are executive powers which cannot constitutionally be exercised by an officer removable by congress those powers cannot be exercised and therefore the automatic deficit reduction ..... exercises of legislative power and through the constitutionally guaranteed impeachment power indeed the removal power is so constrained by its own substantive limits and by the requirement .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Reliance Textiles Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)(10)ECC71

..... whom the product is semi finished or unfinished if a manufacturer seeks permission for removal of the semifinished goods for further manufacturing process the collector is required to consider ..... an excisable semi finished goods into a different excisable goods the collector could permit removal for carrying out manufacturing process which would complete semi finished into finished product 33 .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Orkay Polyester

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)(15)LC162Tri(Mum.)bai

..... excisability stage before painting or polishing and therefore rule 56b would be applicable for removing the chairs for the purpose of painting and polishing shri jagtiani contended textured yarn ..... of texturised filament yarn since poy and textured yarn are two different excisable articles removal of one excisable article for manufacture of another excisable article without payment of duty .....

Indian Rayon Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1986(9)ECC356,1986LC722(Calcutta),1986(25)ELT489(Cal)

..... in respect of paper produced during the relevant period that is after april 1967 but removed from the factory after 1st march 1973 after the concession was withdrawn the assistant ..... the very threshold when excisable commodity is manufactured or produced notwithstanding the point of its removal consumption or being caused the disappearance of when a notification is issued extending exemption partial .....

Goa Foam (Private) Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1988)(18)LC326Tri(Mum.)bai

..... therefore railway receipts can hardly afford any basis to hold that there had been clandestine removal of the quantity mentioned in the show cause notice 10 shri pattekar appearing for respondent ..... records the appellants contended that they were not fully manufactured and therefore they were not removed to bonded store room during the surprise visit the central excise officers found that they .....