Remove - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: remove Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 586 results (0.029 seconds)Smt. Mohinder Kaur and ors. Vs. Wassan Singh Kundan Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-08-1968
Reported in: AIR1968P& H389
mehar singh c j 1 the litigation between the parties out of which this second appeal has arisen concerns the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMytheen Pacha Rowther Masoodu Sahib and ors. Vs. Madhavan Pillai Kunju ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-13-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Ker259
m u isaac j 1 these second appeals arise out of three suits for redemption of three mortgages the contesting...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSrinivasa Padayachi Vs. Parvathiammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-18-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Mad113
natesan j 1 in this second appeal by the chief contesting first defendant who has failed in both the courts...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMottur Hajee Abdul Rahman and Co. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-15-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Mad232; [1968]22STC472(Mad)
orderismail j 1 the petitioner in these petitions filed w p nos 1857 and 1858 of 1968 challenging the validity...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahabir Prasad Sharma Vs. Prafulla Chandra Ghose and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-06-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Cal198,72CWN328
..... stating that they no longer supported the premier the governor removed him from office an action was commenced by the former ..... the advice of the chief minister and the power to remove theministers from office by withdrawing the pleasure contemplated by article ..... expressly provided by this constitution article 311 provides for dismissal removal or reduction in rank of persons employed in civil capacities .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohinder Lal Bagai Vs. the Delhi Administration
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-1968
Reported in: 1970CriLJ793
..... which made the appointment the commissioner and nto the deputy commissioner would be the removing authority and consequently the authority competent to accord sanction for the prosecution under section ..... corporation act is nto violated the deputy commissioner thereforee would be competent authority to remove the appellant of course different situation would arise if appointment of the appellant had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Nanigopal Ghose Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-06-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Cal1
..... treatment the medical practitioner is responsible rightof the medical practitioners to have a patient removed from the list the range of service and duties of medical practitioners arrangements for ..... their practice removal and withdrawal of names from medical list casual absence of an insurance medical practitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarcharan Singh Premi Vs. the Officer Commanding, Army Military Hospit ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-29-1968
Reported in: (1969)2MLJ373
..... officer it has also been admitted that no regulations have been framed for dismissal or removal of a temporary commissioned officer the contention of the learned counsel for the central government ..... the act the rules and the regulations under the act therefore the petitioner cannot be removed by following army instructions army instructions are in the nature of administrative directions and they .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShanthi Saroop Sharma and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1969P& H79
..... of minerals from those to whom he gives the concession to remove them and the charge is on production the rate being fixed ..... irrespective of the fact whether they availed of the privilege of removing fuel form the protected forest or not would amount to a ..... minor minerals computed on the basis of the quantity actually extracted and removed from the leased area accordingly royalty is not of th same .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWainwright Vs. City of New Orleans
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
..... officer and reviling the police an officer then told petitioner to remove his jacket petitioner refused folding his arms and crouching in ..... shows that the defendant acted in self defense and resisted the removal of his clothing the court denied his application holding the ..... they put handcuffs on one of his arms and they removed his jacket on cross examination martello elaborated q you testified .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial