Remove - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: remove Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 487 results (0.035 seconds)Kumarika Subarna Rekha Mani Devi and ors. Vs. Ramakrishna Deo and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1968AP239
..... beyond settled legal principles it is at times used to remove uncertainty or leave no scope for doubts and denotes which ..... has been explained in five specific clauses therein explanation 1 removes all possible distinction that may be made on the basis ..... for jurisdictional purposes the object of these provisions is to remove the difficulties arising from on incorrect or improper determination of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheoraj Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-19-1966
Reported in: AIR1967All528
..... not necessary that the person abducted must be a minor nor that he should be removed from the lawful guardianship of anybody taking into consideration the difference between kidnapping and abduction ..... that the applicants other than raghunandhan were guilty of kidnappings brijbhan minor for they never removed him from the lawful guardianship of his parents the boy was already out of such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Greenwood Vs. Peacock
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-1966
..... activity under federal equal civil rights laws draws support from analogous provisions in the removal statutes available to federal revenue officers long before 1866 federal statutes had guaranteed certain ..... federal revenue officers the right to remove to the federal court state court proceedings instituted against them because of their .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeorgia Vs. Rachel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-1966
..... revised statutes of 1874 footnote 11 when the revised statutes were compiled the substantive and removal provisions of the civil rights act of 1866 were carried forward in separate sections footnote ..... of 1866 prior to the 1874 revision congress had not significantly enlarged the opportunity for removal available to private persons beyond the relatively narrow category of rights specified in the 1866 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Kaluram
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-05-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC1105; 1967(0)BLJR313; 1967MhLJ497(SC); [1967]1SCR266
..... contract area all of which forest contractor may collect and remove from it in accordance with the conditions herein contained during ..... 3 the forest contractor shall commence his work of collecting and removing the said forest produce within one month after furnishing the ..... is paid considers that the value of the forest produce removed by the contractor exceeds the amount of the instalments already .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBatahari Jena and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-19-1966
Reported in: AIR1968Ori44; (1969)ILLJ408Ori
..... the matter finally concluded therein that a compulsory retirement does not amount to dismissal or removal and therefore does not attract the provisions of article 311 of the constitution and therefore ..... reasonably fixed article 311 2 does not apply because such retirement is neither dismissal nor removal of the public servant if a permanent public servant is compulsorily retired under the rules .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Collector of Central Excise Vs. National Tobacco Co. of Indi ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-28-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Cal269,71CWN1
..... are exciseable goods under the law no exciseable goods can be removed from the place where they are produced or manufactured without ..... payment by the manufacturer of the entire sum due before removal alternatively there can be a provisional assessment under rule 10 ..... manufacturer pays the duty calculated on the provisional assessment and removes the goods it has however been laid down that before .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL.R. Melwani Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-12-1966
Reported in: (1967)69BOMLR421
..... cases bearing marks vip which arrived by ss ozarda were removed this clandestine removal was facilitated by accused no 5 who changed the marks ..... contraband it is the case for the prosecution that what was removed on december 23 1959 was not the small case that was ..... enquiries the customs learned that the said two cases were surreptitiously removed by the accused on or about january 2 1960 as stated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKatra Educational Society Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1307; [1966]3SCR328
..... the director is authorised to inspect recognized institutions and to remove defects or deficiencies found on inspection or otherwise and if ..... school and to interfere with the management calling upon them to remove any defect or deficiency found on inspection and the state ..... of the state government in the matter of appointment and removal of the principal or the headmaster and teachers the authority .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAhmed and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-26-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Raj190; 1967CriLJ1053
..... of seetlamataji achparaji bodarji and others and these idols were removed dishonestly from the chabutra by some musalmans which has occasioned ..... consideration because these accused persons were not charged regarding the removal of idol from some body s possession nor any question ..... as a circumstantial evidence indicative of the fact that the removal was by this process of felling or dragging down this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial