Court : Patna
Decided on : Apr-22-2014
1. Sole appellant, Bhikhar Ram who has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 29 of the NDPS Act vide judgment dated 02.09.2011 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years as well as fined Rs.1,00,000/- in default thereof to undergo R.I. for 2 years and 6 months vide order of sentence dated 14.09.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-Ist-cum-Special Judge, NDPS, East Champaran, Motihari in ND P.S. Case No. No.16 of 2007 filed instant appeal. 2. On getting confidential information with regard to smuggling of Ganja on 20.02.2007, PW-3, Irfan Ahmad a member of preventing team of custom along with others including two independent witnesses rushed to Nanaura village and in the morning of 21.02.2007 at about 05:45 A.M. they intercepted one tractor along with trailer laden with stone chips. During course thereof, the other manage to escape while one was apprehended who disclosed his identity as an appellant, Bhikhar Ram and further shown his status as labour-cum-cleaner. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :28. h MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :02. d JULY, 2014 + CRL.A.No.1024/2011 MAN MOHAN VIKAL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mukesh Kalia & Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.No.1124/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.2830/2014 NEPAL CHAND ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia, Advocate with Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND + CRL.A.No.1099/2011 RAJESH BHATI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia, Advocate with Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Man Mohan Vikal (A-1), Nepal Chand (A-2) and Rajesh Bhati (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 30.07.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.88/08 arising out of FIR No.146/05 P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT New Delhi Judgment Reserved on: July 10 , 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 15 , 2014 % + CRL.A. 532/1998 MOHD. ANIS & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, the appellants had challenged the judgment dated August 13, 1998 convicting them for offences under Sections 302/307/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated August 18, 1998 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of `3000/- each for offences under Sections 302/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of `5000/- for offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC. During the pendency of the present appeal, appellant No.1 passed away and thus the appeal qua him stood abated. Thus, the present appeal is now confined to appellant No.2 Mohd.Khalid S/o Mo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-25-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-4405 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-4405 of 2014 Date of Decision: 25.07.2014 Satinder Singh Sandhu ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:-Mr.Subash Chand, Advocate for Mr.Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.D.S.Virk, A.A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. Petitioner-Satinder Singh Sandhu has approached this Court by way of filing the present petition for quashing of FIR No.262 dated 11.11.2010 registered under Sections 406, 498-A and 506 IPC at Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana City along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner and respondent No.2 are husband and wife and had solemnized their marriage on 13.07.2008. Thereafter, their marriage was not smooth and relations between them became strained. N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-25-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-8757 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-8757 of 2014 Date of Decision: 25.07.2014 Gulshan Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr.Viney Saini, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Pradeep Virk, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr.Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. PetitioneRs.namely Gulshan Kumar, Kundal Lal, Tarun Kumar and Tamanna are accused in case FIR No.64 dated 14.02.2011 registered under Sections 498-A/506/323 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station Ambala City. Petitioner no.1 is husband, petitioner No.2 is father-in-law, petitioner No.3 is brother-in-law (jeth) and petitioner No.4 is sister-in-law (jethani) of the complainant-respondent No.2. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 25.11.2000. However, out of the said wedlock, two childr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 23, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 28, 2014 % + CRL.A. 207/2012 VIPIN @ KAKE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.H.R.Dhamija, Mr.N.S.Verma, Mr.N.S.Verma, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Vinod Diwakar, APP for State with Insp.Naresh Kumar PS Badarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vipin @ Kake has been held guilty of murder of Humayun. The finding of guilt has been returned on the basis of ocular testimony of Ram Avtar @ Bobby PW-15, the recovery of country made pistol with empty cartridge case at the instance of Vipin, FSL report and the mobile phone showing the presence of the appellant at the spot. All this happening on a sudden quarrel between Vipin and Humayun and could have been averted if Ram Avtar had reached in time with the ice-cream to cool their heated minds. The learned Trial Court after holding Vipin guilty for offenc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-08-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-27584 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-27584 of 2013 Date of Decision:08. 08.2014 Parminderjit Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Ish Puneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Virk, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate for respondent No.4. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.Petitioners-Parminderjit Singh, Gurjit Singh and Ranjit Kaur have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition for quashing of FIR No.143 dated 10.05.2011 registered under Sections 498- A, 323, 406 and 506 IPC at Police Station Baldev Nagar, Ambala City, District Ambala along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioner No.1 got married to complainant/respondent No.4 on 03.12.2009 and thereafter,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-08-2014
Crl. Misc. No.M-35991 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. No.M-35991 of 2013 Date of Decision:08. 08.2014 Amritpal Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents BEFORE :- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. B.S. Dandiwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Parupkar Singh Ghuman, Addl. A.G., Punjab for the respondent-State. Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.Petitioners-Amritpal Singh, Iqbal Singh, Ujagar Singh, Basant Kaur and Avtar Singh have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition for quashing of FIR No.42 dated 28.05.2013 registered under Sections 498-A, 323, 148, 120-B IPC read with Section 149, IPC, at Police Station Sadar Budlada, District Mansa along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the dispute between the parties has been settled by wa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 17, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 23, 2014 % + CRL.A. 969/2012 MAJID SHEIKH MANSOORI ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate for Ms.Manjusha, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Mahesh Kasana, ATO/Sangam Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Majid Sheikh Mansoori has been held guilty for having murdered his wife Vidya. The learned Trial Judge has returned the verdict of guilt believing Azaruddin PW-7 and Shakil Mohammad PW-19 to be truthful eye witnesses. Recovery of knife Ex.P-1 pursuant to Majid Sheikh Mansooris disclosure statement which was opined by Dr.Raghvinder Kumar PW-4 as capable of causing the 17 stab wounds on Vidya is the other incriminating evidence relied upon. After holding Majid Sheikh Mansoori guilty for the offence of murder vide impugned...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD MONDAY,THE18H DAY OF AUGUST201427TH SRAVANA, 1936 Crl.MC.No. 1282 of 2013 () --------------------------- CC3692011 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, OTTAPPALAM CRIME NO. 339/2011 OF OTTAPALAM POLICE STATION PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.2 TO7 -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HUSSANKUTTY @ KUNHAPPU, S/O. UNNIAN, AGED70YEARS KORAMCHIRA VEEDU, KRISHNAPPADI NELLAYA, CHERPLASSERY,PALAKKAD.2. AMINA ,W/O. HUSSAN KUTTY,,AGED60YEARS KORAMCHIRA VEEDU, KRISHNAPPADI NELLAYA, CHERPLASSERY,PALAKKAD.3. KABIR AGED30YEARS S/O. HUSSAN KUTTY,KORAMCHIRAVEEDU, KRISHNAPPADI NELLAYA, CHERPLASSERY,PALAKKAD.4. SAJILAAGED25YEARS W/O. KABIR, KORAMCHIRAVEEDU, KRISHNAPPADI NELLAYA, CHERPLASSERY,PALAKKAD.5. HAMSA, S/O. HUSSAN KUTTY,AGED35YEARS KORAMCHIRA VEEDU, KRISHNAPPADI NELLAYA, CHERPLASSERY,PALAKKAD.6. SAIRABANU AGED25YEARS W/O. UMMAR, KORAMCHIRA VEEDU, KRISHNAPPADI NELLAYA, CHERPLASSERY...
Tag this Judgment!