Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
1. Heard Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of the appellant as well as Mr. Lalsawirema, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Mizoram. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.8.2012 passed by the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge-IV, Aizawl in SR No. 7/2010 under Section 376 (1) IPC whereby the accused Zorama was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 30 days. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on 7.10.2010 one Vanlalruati lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-charge, Kulikawn Police Station stating that beginning from September 2008 till October, 2010, her granddaughter Lalrinsangi (14) daughter of Lalthanmawia of Chaltlang was threatened and sexually abused by her husband Zorama (46), Gorkhali by birth. She came to learn of these incidents while taking her granddaughter for a medical check up a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-03-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. By The State P.P.For The State Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Grant Leave To Appeal Against The Judgment And Order Of Acquittal Passed By Learned Prl.Judge, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore In S.C.No.255/2004 Dated:20.01.2009, Thereby Acquitting The Respondents-Accused Of The Offences P/U/'S 302 R/W Sec.34 Of Ipc.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the State against the judgment and order dated 20.01.2009 passed by the Principal Sessions Court, Bangalore Rural, Bangalore. By the said judgement the trial Court acquitted accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for the offences under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of I.P.C. However, Accused No.1 is convicted for the offences under Section 304-11 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000/-. Since the accused No.1 has already served sentence and paid fine he is released from custody. Convicted accused No.1 has not filed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-08-2014
Oral Judgment: A.R. Joshi, J. 1) Heard rival arguments on this appeal preferred by the appellantoriginal accused No.2 challenging the judgment and order of conviction in Sessions Case No. 1043 of 2004. 2) The impugned judgment and order was passed by 6th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Sewree Mumbai dated 25th June, 2008. The appellantaccused No.2 was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 and also under Section 452 of Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and one year imprisonment respectively. Also respective fine amounts of Rs.500/ and Rs.100/ were imposed. The substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. Original accused No.1 was acquitted of the said charges. The State has not preferred any appeal against the acquittal of accused No.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction, appellantaccused No.2 preferred this appeal. 3) The prosecution case, briefly stated, is as under : The incident o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-03-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF JUNE, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M SHANTANAGOUDAR THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C R KUMARASWAMY AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.358 OF2009BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HEBBAGODI POLICE APPELLANT (BY SRI .B.T.VENKATESH, SPP II) AND:1. R.H.KESHAVA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT25YEARS R/O RAMASAGARA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK2 HANUMANTHAPPA S/O RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT55YEARS R/O RAMASAGARA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK3 GOVINDAPPA S/O B.RAMAIAH2AGED ABOUT55YEARS R/O RAMASAGARA VILLAGE ANEKAL TALUK (BY SRI .S.K.VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE) RESPONDENTS ******* THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3781) & (3) CR.P.C. BY THE STATE P.P.FOR THE STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO GRANT LEAVE TO APPEAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF ACQUITTAL PASSED BY LEARNED PRL.JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN S.C.NO.255/2004 THEREBY ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS-ACCUSED OF THE OFFENCES P/U/S302R/W SEC.34 OF IPC. DATED:20.01....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.820 OF2010Kunwarpal @ Surajpal & Ors. .. Appellants versus State of Uttarakhand And Anr. .. Respondents JUDGMENT C. NAGAPPAN, J.This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 18.8.1991 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.1418 of 2001. Appellants 1 to 4 stood charged for the offence under Section 302/34 in Sessions Trial No.195 of 1991 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge Roorkee and the Trial Court convicted all and sentenced them each to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500 in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each. Accused Nos. 1 to 4 preferred appeal in Criminal Appeal No.1418 of 2001 on the file of High Court and the appeal came to be dismissed. Challenging the conviction and sentence accused Nos. 1 to 4 preferred the present appeal. During the hearing the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-17-2014
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2672014 Decided on 17th November, 2014 SMT. SANTOSHI & ORS Through: versus ..... Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants are legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Nath. They filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi seeking compensation of `4 lacs in respect of death of Shri Ram Nath in relation to Firozpur Janta Express train. She alleged that on 8th October, 2012 deceased-Ram Nath was travelling from Tuglakabad Station to New Delhi Railway Station by Firozpur Janta Express when he accidentally fell down from the crowded compartment of the running train near Shivaji Bridge, Delhi due to heavy rush and sudden jerk. Deceased was rushed to RML Hospital where he died on 10:50 pm on the same day.2. Respondent alleged that deceased did not die in an untoward incident within the m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:05. 10/2009 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR Crl.O.P.No.12837 of 2009 M.Nageswaran ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Organised Crime Unit II Crime Branch CID Guindy, Chennai 600 032 ... Respondent This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to give a suitable direction to the respondent not to harass and threaten the petitioner to support the prosecution case as approver and further petitioner may be permitted to appear before the court on receipt of summons. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabhakaran For Respondent : Mr.I.Paul Nobel Devakumar, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The second accused in Cr.No.1/2009 originally registered on the file of CBCID, Pudukottai, then re-registered and now pending on the file of CBCID (Organised Crime Unit II), Alandur, Guindy, Chennai as Cr.No.1/2009 has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying for an order directing the respondent, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-17-2014
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2672014 Decided on 17th November, 2014 SMT. SANTOSHI & ORS Through: versus ..... Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants are legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Nath. They filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi seeking compensation of `4 lacs in respect of death of Shri Ram Nath in relation to Firozpur Janta Express train. She alleged that on 8th October, 2012 deceased-Ram Nath was travelling from Tuglakabad Station to New Delhi Railway Station by Firozpur Janta Express when he accidentally fell down from the crowded compartment of the running train near Shivaji Bridge, Delhi due to heavy rush and sudden jerk. Deceased was rushed to RML Hospital where he died on 10:50 pm on the same day.2. Respondent alleged that deceased did not die in an untoward incident within the m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 810/2014 JEET SINGH @ JEETU & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jeet Singh @ Jeetu and Kalu @ Neeraj both sons of Chattarsen have been convicted for the offence of murder of Deewan, on the strength of testimony of Chet Ram PW-6 the brother of the deceased vide the impugned judgment dated April 29, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each vide order dated May 07, 2014.2. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the presence of Chet Ram at the spot when the incident took place has not been proved as PW-4 Raghunath who informed the police does not depo...
Tag this Judgment!