Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Court: guwahati Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.007 seconds)

Mar 19 2014 (HC)

Yarringchan Angkang Vs. The State of Nagaland and Others

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-19-2014

..... ps dist.: dimapur state: nagaland (b) name: tali ao age: 42 years s/o: late tamgam ao vill: longjang po: impur ps: impur dist.: mokokchung state: nagaland present address:- vill: nepali basti ps: west ps dist.: dimapur state: nagaland (c) name: awon angkang age: 40 years w/o: somi angkang vill: sashamphung ps: ukhrul dist.: ukhrul state: manipur present address:- vill .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2014 (HC)

Tolaram Bafna Artificial Limb and Caliper Centre and Others Vs. The St ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-07-2014

(CAV), J. 1. The challenge in the writ petition is the Annexure-XIII Request for Proposal (RFP) dated 03/02/2012 followed by the Memorandum of Understanding dated 11/06/2012 entered into between the Government of Assam in the Health and Family Welfare Department headed by the Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission (hereinafter referred to as NRHM), Assam and the respondent No.4 Narayan Hrudayalaya, a private limited Company, as according to the petitioners such a course of action adopted by the respondents is contrary to the earlier promise made out to them in respect of running of the particular hospital, namely, Tolaram Subhkaran Bafna District Hospital. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS: 2. The petitioners numbering 3 are charitable trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and are represented by their Chairman and Managing Trustee. They have filed the writ petition challenging the action of the Government of Assam in the Health Department in entering into a Memorandum o...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2014 (HC)

Kanak Boro, Assam Vs. The State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-24-2014

Katakey, J. 1. This appeal, by the convict, is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 09.02.2011 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC) No.1, Kamrup at Guwahati, in Sessions Case No.161(K)/2004, convicting the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 1(one) year. 2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 14.08.2000 at about 12.30 P.M. accused Kanak Boro being armed with deadly weapon, like dagger, entered into the courtyard of the informant, namely, Mukuta Boro (not examined) and assaulted his father Golok Boro resulting in his death on the spot. A G.D. entry was also made based on the information furnished by one Ranjit Boro (who has not been examined). A written F.I.R. was thereafter lodged by Mukuta Boro (not examined) on 14.08.2000 with the Officer-in-Charge of Hajo Police Station, based on which Hajo P.S. Case No.1...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2014 (HC)

Zorama Vs. State of Mizoram

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-17-2014

1. Heard Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of the appellant as well as Mr. Lalsawirema, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Mizoram. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.8.2012 passed by the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge-IV, Aizawl in SR No. 7/2010 under Section 376 (1) IPC whereby the accused Zorama was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 30 days. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on 7.10.2010 one Vanlalruati lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-charge, Kulikawn Police Station stating that beginning from September 2008 till October, 2010, her granddaughter Lalrinsangi (14) daughter of Lalthanmawia of Chaltlang was threatened and sexually abused by her husband Zorama (46), Gorkhali by birth. She came to learn of these incidents while taking her granddaughter for a medical check up a...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2014 (HC)

Jogighopa Ashok Kagajkal Sramik Santha, Represented by the Secretary V ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-27-2014

Oral 1. This writ petition was filed in 2008 by the Jogighopa Ashok Kagajkal Sramik Santha, represented by its Secretary, C/o- Ashok Paper Mill (Assam) Ltd. District- Bongaigaon, Assam. Apart from the prayer for appropriate decision in respect of the Mill and also the future of its employees and workers, further prayer made is to direct the respondents to pay the admissible salaries to the existing employees and workers for the periods indicated in the prayer portion of the writ petition specified as:- Take appropriate steps to clear the outstanding dues to the employees and workers of the Mill for the period of April-May of 1995, August 1997 to October, 1997 and October 1998 to 7th March, 2008. Take appropriate steps to make up to date the provident fund accounts of the employees and workers of the Mill in question for the gap period i.e. w.e.f. 01.04.1995 up to 30.09.1998 of all the employees/workers including those who retired and expired in the meantime. Another prayer made in the ...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd, New Delhi Vs. M/s. Silk Point, A Proprieto ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-12-2014

A.M. Sapre, CJ. This is an intra-court appeal filed by the respondent No.1 of WP(C) No.1952/2009 under Rule 2(3) of Chapter V-A of the Gauhati High Court Rules against the order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the Single Judge in abovementioned writ petition. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1 herein and issued a writ of certiorari and mandamus against the appellant (respondent No.1 of writ petition) which reads as under: No other issue survives for consideration. For the aforementioned reasons, this writ petition is allowed. The impugned letters dated 9-2-2009 (Annexure-IX) and 20-2-2009 (Annexure-XIII) issued by the respondents No.2 are hereby quashed. Consequently, the respondents No.1 and 2 are directed to entertain the claim of the petitioner in respect of the Insurance Policy No.321100/48/2009/836 and settle the same in accordance with law. No costs. So the short question, which arises for consideration in this intra ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //