Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:- 5th February, 2014 + CRIMINAL APPEAL4131998 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellant Through Mr. G.S. Sharma and Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.The third appellant, namely, Om Prakash @ Bengali brother of the other two appellants Sunil Kumar and Om Babu @ Pappu expired during the pendency of the present appeal. The present appeal, therefore, has been pressed on behalf of Sunil Kumar and Om Babu @ Pappu.2. The two appellants along with the deceased appellant Om Babu @ Pappu by the impugned judgment dated 17th September, 1998 stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Tejpal at about 8.00-8.30 p.m. on 2nd October, 1992. By order of sentence dated 19th September, 1998, the two appellants have been sentenced to life ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-31-2014
Crl. Appeal Nos. D-783-DB of 2009 and other cases -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :31. 1.2014. Crl. Appeal No.D-783-DB of 2009 Surjit Singh and others ........ Appellants Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent Crl. Appeal No.D-790-DB of 2009 Kartar Singh and others ........ Appellants Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent Crl. Appeal No.D-815-DB of 2009 Gurpal Singh @ Hargopal Singh ........ Appellant Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent Crl. Appeal No.D-931-DB of 2009 Labh Singh and others ...... Appellants Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH Present:- Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate, with, Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellants, in CRA No.D-783-DB of 2009. Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocate, for the appellants, in CRA No.D-790-DB of 2009. Sharma Sanjiv Kumar 2014.02.20 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Crl. Appeal Nos...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-17-2014
CRM M31513of 2012 and connected matter 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- Date of decision:17. 02.2014 1. CRM M31513of 2012 Sanju Bala and another ..........Petitioners Versus Poonam Bala and another .........Respondents 2. CRM M8850of 2013 Anju Bala and another ........ Petitioners Versus Poonam Bala and another .......Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal -.- Present: Mr. H S Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioners (CRM M31513of 2012) None for the petitioners (CRM M8850of 2013 ) Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Amarinder Singh Klar, AAG, Punjab for the respondent State -.- 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Rekha Mittal, J.By way of this order, I shall dispose of CRM M31513of 2012 and CRM M8850of 2013, as these are the offshoot of the same proceedings involving identical questions of law an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-13-2014
Criminal Appeal No.378-DB-2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal No.378-DB-2009 Date of decision:13.02.2014 Vijay @ Pappu ... Appellant Versus State of Haryana .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present: Mr. Bijender Dhankar, Advocate and Mr. Vikas Lochab (Legal Aid Counsel) for the appellant. Mr. Baldev Singh, Addl. A.G. Haryana. RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant-Vijay Pal @ Pappu son of Ram Chander has filed this appeal challenging judgment dated 16.3.2009 and order dated 17.3.2009 convicting him for an offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of deposit of fine to undergo imprisonment for six months.2. The appellant has been arraigned for the murder of one Poonam, who was allegedly living with him. Gurvinder Singh son of Didar Thakral Rajeev 2014.03.05 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and inte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-04-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: March 4, 2014 + CS(OS) 102/2013, I.A. No.932/2013 & I.A. No.2869/2014 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms.Ekta Sarin, Adv. versus K.M SALIM ..... Defendant Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Plaintiffs have filed a suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trade mark, infringement of copyright, passing off and act of unfair competition.2. Despite of service, on 15th March, 2013, the defendant chose not to appear in Court. He was proceeded ex-parte on 14th February, 2014. The plaintiffs filed an application under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for pronouncement of judgment against the defendant on account of failure to file the written statement and to contest the matter.3. Counsel for the plaintiffs made her submissions on merit also.4. Let me examine the case of plaintiffs on merit.5. The plaintiff No.1, the Coca-Cola Company (TCCC), is a corporati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 20, 2014 + CRL.A. 666/2009 VINOD @ CHAVANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 16.01.2008, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge had convicted the appellant for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs.5,000/- or in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is reproduced as under:- On 14.02.2005. Constable Ashok Kumar, while posted at PS Mangolpuri, was on duty in F a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: April 02, 2014 + CRL.A.694/1999 ABDUL RASHEED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CRL.A.1/2000 MOHD. YAMEEN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + CRL.A.4/2000 ABDUL HAMID ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: Crl.A. Nos. 694/1999, 1/2000 & 4/2000 ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 The challenge in these appeals is to the impugned judgment dated 24.11.1999 and the order on sentence dated 29.11.1999, passed by the learned Additional ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Apr-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GA No.2404 of 2012 GA No.2778 of 2012 CS No.268 of 2012 SUDHA KHEMKA AND ANOTHER -VERSUS- CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS For the Plaintiffs: Mr Mr Mr Mr Pratap Chatterjee, Sr Adv., Reetobrata Mitra, Adv., Manik Das, Adv., Rudrajit Sarkar, Adv.For the Defendant No.1: Ms Usha Doshi, Adv.For the Defendant No.2: Mr Hirak Mitra, Sr Adv., Mr Arun Geetesh, Adv., Ms Nilanjana Adhya, Adv., Mr Rishav Medora, Adv.For the Defendant No.3: Mr Anuj Singh, Adv., Mr S.E.Huda, Adv., Mr Sounak Sengupta, Adv., Ms Purnima Nath, Adv., Mr Lucky Mukherjee, Adv.Hearing concluded on: April 2, 2014. BEFORE SANJIB BANERJEE, Judge Date: April 8, 2014. SANJIB BANERJEE, J. : Nostalgia may have no place in a judgment, but it may be excusable to lament the extinction of a few legal axioms in the wake of the new laws that now come in faster than one can make it count and, often, unmindful of the manner of implementation thereof. What remains unchange...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Apr-10-2014
Form No.J.(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee A.P.D.No.213 of 2005 C.S.No.616 of 1990 Smt. Amala Palit & Anr. versus Smt. Ratna Bose & ORS.For the Appellant : Mr.Deba Prasad Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr.Bidyut Kumar Banerjee, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr.Joydip Kar, Advocate Mr.Anirban Kar, Advocate Mr.Suvadeep Sen, Advocate Heard on : Judgment on : April 10, 2014 March 20, 21, 25, 26 & April 1, 2014 ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE, J. FACTS: Subject property being premises No.24A Balaram Ghosh Street Calcutta was an old building at North Calcutta owned by Mukherjee family. By registered Deed of Lease dated July 25, 1964 Mukherjees leased out a portion of the said building being open and vacant courtyard at the back portion of the building for twenty one years in favour of the appellants. The lease expired by efflux of time in July 1985. As a condition of the lease, t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-20-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.1600 of 2014 APO No.177 of 2014 WP No.353 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.MERCURY EXPORTERS AND MANUFACTURING P. LTD & ANR Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA Date : 20th May, 2014. (Vacation Bench) Appearance: Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv.Mr.C.K.Dutta, Adv.Mr.Provat Sil, Adv.for the petitioneRs.Mr.Siddhartha Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Victor Datta, Adv.for the respondents. The Court : The appeal is directed against an order of May 6, 2014 by which the writ petition has been dismissed on the ground that the petitioners remedy under Section 17 of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 would be available at the appropriate stage. The writ petition was directed against a notice dated February 22, 2010 issued by the bank in exercise of its authority under Section 13(4) of the said Act. 2 The b...
Tag this Judgment!