Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Referred Case Is Registered As Required Under Section 366 Cr.P.C. For Confirmation Of Death Sentence Awarded To Accused No.10 Syed Mohammed Ibrahim S/O Late Mohammed Ismail By The Xxxiv Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Presiding Oficer, Spl. Court, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore By Judgment Of Conviction Dated 21/29-11-2008 In Sc No.696 Of 2005. This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Appellant Praying To Set Aside The Judgment And Order Of Convictions Dated 21.11.2008 And Sentences Dated 29.11.2008 Passed In S.C.No.696/2005, On The File Of 34th Addl. City Civil And Session Judge And P.O Spl.Court For The Trial Of Church Bomb Blast Cases, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore.) 1. A series of bomb blasts at Churches situate at various places rocked the State of Karnataka in the year 2000 attempting to disturb the normal tranquility of the civilized society and the peace loving people of Karnataka who believe in co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-22-2014
Oral Judgment: (P.V. Hardas, J.) 1. The Appellant/Original Accused Nos.1,2,3 and 6, who stand convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to each pay fine of Rs.5,000/- in default of which to undergo further R.I. for one year, by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, by Judgment dated 5.10.2007, in Sessions Case No.446 of 2004 and Sessions Case No.106 of 2005, by this Appeal question the correctness of their conviction and sentence. 2. Facts in brief as are necessary for the decision of this Appeal may briefly be stated thus :- PW-6 ASI Kondiba Malhari Thengil, who, on 3.4.2004, was attached to the Mulund Police Station and was present in the Hindusthan Police Chowky, was informed by two persons about assault on Yogesh Rathod. PW-6 ASI Thengil, therefore, accordingly went with those two persons in an auto-rickshaw to the scene of the incident which was in front of Gidwani High Scho...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO.693/2014 BETWEEN: MEHARUNNISA D/O SYED HABEEB @ SYED HABEEBULLA, AGED ABOUT28YEARS, R/O DOOR No.83, LIG-1, KHB COLONY, SIRA GATE, TUMKUR-572 103.-. PETITIONER (BY SRI. BOPANNA. B, ADVOCATE BPDS ASSOCIATES) AND SYED HABEEB @ SYED HABEEBULLA S/O LATE SYED GHOUSE PEER, AGED ABOUT54YEARS,R/OF9H BATTALLION, KSRP, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE, NOW R/AT1T BATALLION, KSRP, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE, NOW R/AT1T BATALLION, D-KSRP, RICHMOND ROAD CIRCLE, NEAR HOSMAT HOSPITAL, BANGALORE-560 025. (BY SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE) - RESPONDENT2THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S482OF CR.P.C. BY THE PETITIONER TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED2510.2013 PASSED BY THE F.T.C., TUMKUR IN CRL. R.P. No.149/2012 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED1704.2012 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. C.J.AND J.M.F.C., TUMKUR IN C. MISC. NO.455/2007 AT ANNEXURE-A AND B & ETC. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN RE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 17th day of December, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL RC NO.3 OF2008c/w CRL.A NO.1203 OF2008& CRL.A. NO.24 OF2009CRIMINAL RC NO.3 OF2008BETWEEN:: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL BANGALORE ...PETITIONER (By Sri H N NILOGAL, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) AND: SYED MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMED ISMAIL ...RESPONDENT2THIS CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE IS REGISTERED AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION366CR.P.C. FOR CONFIRMATION OF DEATH SENTENCE AWARDED TO ACCUSED NO.10 SYED MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O LATE MOHAMMED ISMAIL BY THE XXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE & PRESIDING OFICER, SPL. COURT, CENTRAL PRISON PREMISES, BANGALORE BY JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED2129-11-2008 IN SC NO.696 OF2005 CRL.A NO.1203 OF2008BETWEEN: SYED MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMED ISMAIL AGED ABOUT45YEARS ACCOUNTS MANAGER M.N.C., VARTHUR BANGALORE CITY (NOW IN JUDICIAL CUS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on : Dec-04-2014
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU OWP No. 1275 OF2014AND OWP No. 1395 OF20141 Atman College of Education &ors 2 Shri Sai Shyam College of Education Petitioners University of Jammu and ors Respondent !Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohsin Bhat, Advocate ^Mr. W.S.Nargal, Advocate. Honble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal-Judge Date:04. 12.2014 :JUDGMENT :1. Petitioners are private/non-Government B. Ed. Colleges affiliated with the University of Jammu, respondent No. 1 (for short the University). They have been allowed different intake of students. Faced with the evil of nonattendance of students in the B. Ed. Colleges, the University by virtue of a decision taken in the 6th meeting of its College Development Council (CDC), respondent No. 4, held on 03.07.2014 has devised a formula to reduce the intake seats of these colleges for the session 2014-2015 proportionate to the level of non-attendance noticed in the course of two 2 inspections held during the previous session. Pur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present:The Honble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN G.A.No.914 of 2014 MANGALAM FISCAL SERVICES PVT.LTD.versus STATE BANK OF INDIA For the Plaintiff : Mr.Satarup Banerjee For the Defendant No.1 : Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sreyea Basu Mallick Heard On : 22.08.2014, 29.08.2014, 29.10.14, 05.11.2014, 17.11.2014. Judgment On : 3rd December, 2014 Soumen Sen, J.:- This application is at the instance of the defendant Bank for rejection and or dismissal of the plaint on the ground that the suit is barred under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as SARFAESI Act).The plaintiff has instituted the suit on 18th December, 2013 praying, inter alia, for a declaration that the classification of the account of the plaintiff borrower in the cash credit account maintained with the bank as non-performing asset is bad and all meas...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 08, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1065/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with SI Dalip Kumar, Spl.Cell/NDR. versus BASHIR AHMED PONNU & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The State is aggrieved by the decision of the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the respondents Bashir Ahmed Ponnu, Fayaz Ahmed Lone, Abdul Majeed Baba and Shahid Gafoor for the offences punishable under Section 120B/121/121-A/122/123 IPC & Section 17/18/20/21/23 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (in short the UAP Act), acquitting Bashir Ahmed for offence punishable under Section 489(B)/489 (C) of IPC and Shahid Gafoor for offences punishable under Section 186/353/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1048/2014 RAJU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Adv. with appellant in person. Versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp.Rajesh Kumar, PS Swaroop Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Raju was charged for committing the murder of Smt.Shashi Rai and firing upon Ajay thus causing bullet injuries on his person in furtherance of common intention with one A a juvenile. Vide impugned judgment dated July 16, 2014 the learned Trial Court has convicted Raju for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, 307/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine in sum of `50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine in sum of `50,000/- for...
Tag this Judgment!