Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-25-2014
..... to the extent the violations of arms act, the findings recorded by the special judge do not warrant any interference.178. however, the argument raised is that yusuf nepali was not the part of the conspiracy of hijacking of aircraft and that his retracted confessional statement, does not disclose that he was part of the conspiracy for ..... 309 cr.p.c. for recalling the witnesses for cross- examination. the revision was preferred by abdul latif, which was decided on 23.04.2004. accused yusuf nepali and bhujel have accepted the order passed by the learned trial court. such application was filed when their writ petition challenging the convening of court in jail was pending ..... hereinafter shall be referred to as a-1 to a-10 respectively.3. the appellants namely abdul latif and bhujel are the indian nationals, whereas appellant yusuf nepali is a national of nepal. all other accused are the pakistan nationals and are proclaimed offenders.4. the brief facts leading to the present appeals are that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-23-2014
..... arrested by the police party on the identification of mohinder singh. therefore, there was no need of identification parade qua him. regarding vishal arya @ sonu nepali and sukhjit singh @ kaka, they were certainly not previously known to the complainant. they were shown to the complainant in the police station and identified in ..... singh @ noni stated that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated. the remaining accused kulwinder singh @ kinda, sukhjit singh @ kaka, vishal arya @ sonu nepali and malkiat singh also took the similar plea. in defence, accused examined nirmal kaur (dw1) and closed the evidence. after hearing the learned additional public prosecutor ..... judgment will dispose of cra no.d-765-db of 2009, filed by accused/appellants pushpinder singh @ noni, kulwinder singh @ kinda, vishal arya @ sonu nepali and sukhjit singh @ kaka against the judgment and order dated 10.8.2009, passed by the learned additional sessions judge, jalandhar, vide which the accused kulwinder singh .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-19-2014
..... was served upon the petitioner, when was posted as incharge of the police post barwala levelling allegations that a small child of about two years of age, a son of nepali labourer working at a poultry farm known as amit poultry farm, barwala, who had fallen in the water tank and died, when information in this regard was received by the ..... reached there for taking necessary action. a compromise was got arrived at between the owner of amit poultry farm, namely, nitin garg and the father of the deceased child, a nepali labourer, named ramdev, where a sum of `60,000/- was paid by the owner of the poultry farm to the labourer, who was allowed to go away to an unknown .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-27-2014
Singh Varinder 2014.04.01 16:51 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at AT CHANDIGARH Chandigarh CWP No.5067 of 1994 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.3.2014 Raj Kumar Kapoor (deceased) and others .Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others .Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajesh Bindal Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for petitioner Nos.2 to 4. Mr.Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. Rajesh Bindal, J. The petitioners have approached this court impugning the action of the respondents whereby pay scale granted to them has been withdrawn and as a consequence thereof, the recovery was directed from them. The benefit was granted to the petitioners vide order dated 22.1.1991 issued by the District & Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, in terms of notification issued by the State of Punjab on 15.6.1990. It was pertaining to higher scales as Junior Scale Stenographers Grade-I and Grade-...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-03-2014
FAO No.3692 of 2006 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3692 of 2006 (O&M). Date of Decision: March 03, 2014. Parveen Kumar ...Appellant(s) Versus Nepal Thakar and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. Yes/No 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?. Yes/No 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. No Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. None for respondents. ***** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J.1. This is the claimant's appeal who is aggrieved by the dismissal of his claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnaul (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) vide its award dated 19.12.2005 dismissed the claim petition.2. The claimant was stated to be a helper on a bus driven by respondent no.1. On 22.10.2004, the bus bearing registration no.RJ-14P-6589 was running on His...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-14-2014
vinod kumar 2014.05.20 15:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Rs.No.49 of 1988 (O&M) [1].***** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.49 of 1988 (O&M) Date of decision:14.05.2014 Harchand Singh ...Appellant Versus Ujjagar Singh and other ...Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.P.S.Punia, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The plaintiff is in appeal against the judgment and decree of both the Courts below in a suit filed for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering in his possession over the land in dispute measuring 11 bighas 0 biswa. The plaintiff has claimed that he is in possession over of the suit property for the last more than 40 years as a tenant. On the other hand, the case of the defendants is that the land was owned by respondent no.4, who sold it to defendant no.3 and the plaintiff entere...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-26-2014
Civil Writ Petition No.4558 of 2013 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No.4558 of 2013 Date of Decision: 26.5.2014. Ranbir Singh .......Petitioner Versus PEPSU Roadways Transport Corporation ......Respondents and another CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondents (a) to release the benefit of one special increment for non-participation in the general strike and, consequently, fixation of pension and release of all pensionary benefits; (b) to release the benefit of one increment under ACP scheme ; (c) to count 5 years and 7 months of service as qualifying service towards total period for fixation of pension and pensionary benefits ; (d) to count the period with effect from 10.2.1972 to 1.2.1973 in terms of judgment passed by this Court (Annexure P-7) ; (e) to release the benefits of revised pay scales...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-25-2014
CRA-380-DB-2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-D-380-DB-2009 Date of decision:April 25, 2014 Mohan Pal @ Monu and another ... Appellants Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH Present: Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Manjri Nehru Kaul, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Jaspal Singh, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by Mohan Pal @ Monu and Raj Singh @ Raju feeling dissatisfied against the judgment of conviction dated April 4, 2009 and order of sentence dated April 7, 2009 whereby they have been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.2500/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for two months.2. In nutshell, the case of the prosecution as unfolded by Jeena wife of Ramesh Kumar resident of Railway Colony, Amritsar, while getting her statement recorded with SI Jagatpreet Singh ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-18-2014
Criminal Misc.No.M-35 of 2014 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-35 of 2014 Date of Decision: 18th February, 2014 Bajrang Saini .Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.H.N.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Nitin Kaushal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Nipun Vashist, Advocate, for the complainant. *** Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner Bajrang Saini who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 365, IPC, in a case arising out of FIR No.446, dated 09.11.2013, registered at Police Station, Dharuhera, District Rewari. Learned counsel contends that a money transaction has been given shape of a criminal case. According to the prosecution, Nepal Singh was allegedly kidnapped by the petitioner and his Co.accused but on the date of alleged occurrence, the police of Kotputli (Rajasthan) recorded the state...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
CRA No.D-229-DBA of 2001 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.D-229-DBA of 2001 Date of decision: January 09, 2014 State of Punjab .................Appellant versus 1. Budh Singh son of Hari Singh son of Hakam Singh, aged 74 years, agriculturist, resident of Indra Basti Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur (dead, appeal abated against him in terms of Section 394 (1) Cr.P.C. vide order dated 09.09.2013).2. Jagrup Singh son of Budh Singh,, aged 31 years, agriculturist, resident of Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur 3. Manmeet Singh son of Daljit Singh, aged 26 years, agriculturist resident of Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur. .............Respondents. Criminal Revision No.455 of 2001 Date of decision: January 09, 2014 Hardev Singh son of Bant Singh, resident of village Higarwal, District Sangrur .................Petitioner versus 1. The State of Punjab 2. Budh Singh son of Hari Singh son of Hakam Singh, aged 74 Sunder Sham years, agriculturist, resident of In...
Tag this Judgment!