Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-30-2014
..... named laxmi and sheela lived nearby and laxmi had an issue with rajbala concerning rajbala spreading in the neighbourhood that she had seen laxmi in a compromising position with a nepali boy. that apart, before asi om prakash entered the scene, the first police personnel to have met rajbala was ct.ramesh pw-22, on duty at the casualty of ..... deposed that sunita was her elder sister. her mother s name was rajbala. she knew laxmi and sheela. her mother had seen laxmi in a compromising position with a nepali boy and this was the reason for the strained relationship between her mother and laxmi. on september 20, 1995 she and her sisters sunita and shyama were in their house ..... she knew the accused since they were distantly related to them. her mother rajbala had strained relations with laxmi because she had seen laxmi in a compromising position with a nepali boy. she deposed that on september 20, 1995 she was present in her house at 1:45 pm and so was her sister and her brother. laxmi and sheela .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
..... under sections 392/394/302 read with section 34 of the ipc by the judgment dated 4th march, 2010. however the other two accused, namely raj kumar and monu thappa @ nepali were given the benefit of doubt for the reason that no incriminating article had been recovered from them or at their instance and hence no role could be attributed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-06-2014
..... on the cot. the eldest son of sarla aged 20 years had slept on the roof. further deposition of pw-3 being that sarla and her husband were talking in nepali language and after that they both smoked cigarettes. later on sarla came and slept with pw-3 on the floor. after half an hour, dhan bahadur came to the floor .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
..... under sections 392/394/302 read with section 34 of the ipc by the judgment dated 4th march, 2010. however the other two accused, namely raj kumar and monu thappa @ nepali were given the benefit of doubt for the reason that no incriminating article had been recovered from them or at their instance and hence no role could be attributed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-01-2014
..... under sections 392/394/302 read with section 34 of the ipc by the judgment dated 4th march, 2010. however the other two accused, namely raj kumar and monu thappa @ nepali were given the benefit of doubt for the reason that no incriminating article had been recovered from them or at their instance and hence no role could be attributed to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 11.2014 CM96872014 in W.P.(C) 1971/2014 BAYER CORPORATION ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Sanjay Kumar, Ms Arpita Sawhney and Mr Arun Kumar. For the Respondents : Mr Riput Daman S. Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr T.P. Singh for UOI. Mr Mukesh Anand with Ms Sonia Sharma, Mr V.C. Jha for R-2 to 4 Customs Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 This is an application filed on behalf of respondent no.5 (hereafter referred to as NPL) inter alia praying for permission to export 1 kg. of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (hereafter API) Sorafenib for the purposes of conducting development/clinical studies and trials. The said application was necessitated because of an interim order dated 26.03.2014 passed by this Court whereby respondent nos. 1 to 4 were directed to ensure ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
D.N. Panda, J. 1. Appeal No. E/141/2005, 143/2005 and 144/2005 is one batch of appeal which covers the period 1.12.1998 to 31.03.2004, arose out of common adjudication. The other batch of appeals No.972/2012, 988/2012 to 992/2012 covers the period April, 2004 to April 2006 arose out of common appeal order. 2. Revenue is in appeal registered as E/3044/2005. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEES 3. Ld. Counsel Shri B. L. Narasimhan appearing for assessees submits that there are 3 issues involved in the first batch of appeal registered as appeal Nos. 141/2005, 143/2005 and 144/2005 relating to the period 01.12.1998 to 31.03.2004. MANUFACTURE NIPPLE 4. The first issue in the first batch of appeals is whether complete feeding bottles cleared, manufacturing only nipple thereof and affixing/assembling thereto other components/accessories bought out from outside or manufactured by others, amounts to manufacture. 5. On behalf of appellant it was submitted that the nipple manufactured by the appell...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-30-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:30. 01.2014 + Crl.Appeal No.392/2010 JAI YODHAD Through: .Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Prateek, Advs. Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 8.7.2008, SI Sunil Jain of Narcotic Branch received secret information that a person named Jai, resident of Nepal, who is engaged in bringing Ganja from Nepal to Delhi and selling the same, in association with one Norbu, will meet Norbu between 6.30 pm to 7 pm on that date at Railway Crossing, Shalimar Village and a huge quantity of Ganja would be supplied. The aforesaid information was brought by SI Sunil Jain to the notice of Inspector M.L. Sharma of Narcotic Branch and he also produced the informer before him. After making inquiries from the informer, Inspector M.L. Sharma brought the information to the notice of the concerned ACP Mr. M.S. Dabas on telephone. The said ACP directed him to conduc...
Tag this Judgment!