Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 24, 2014 + FAO(OS) 540/2014 SHENZEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Amisha Nagarajan, Mr.Nischal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates versus MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra, Ms.Jyoti Pawar and Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Ashwani Mata, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.M.S.Ananth, Mr.A.Banarjee and Mr.Raghav Kapoor, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We shall be referring to the parties as under:- (a) Micromax Informatics Ltd. (The Plaintiff) : Micromax (b) Shenzhen OnePlus Technology Co.Ltd. (Defendant No.1) (c) : OnePlus Cyanogen Inc. and CyanogenMod LLC (Defendants No.2 &3) FAO (OS) No.540/2014 2. Micromax is the protagonist and OnePlus is the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 810/2014 JEET SINGH @ JEETU & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jeet Singh @ Jeetu and Kalu @ Neeraj both sons of Chattarsen have been convicted for the offence of murder of Deewan, on the strength of testimony of Chet Ram PW-6 the brother of the deceased vide the impugned judgment dated April 29, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each vide order dated May 07, 2014.2. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the presence of Chet Ram at the spot when the incident took place has not been proved as PW-4 Raghunath who informed the police does not depo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 24, 2014 + FAO(OS) 540/2014 SHENZEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Amisha Nagarajan, Mr.Nischal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates versus MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra, Ms.Jyoti Pawar and Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Ashwani Mata, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.M.S.Ananth, Mr.A.Banarjee and Mr.Raghav Kapoor, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We shall be referring to the parties as under:- (a) Micromax Informatics Ltd. (The Plaintiff) : Micromax (b) Shenzhen OnePlus Technology Co.Ltd. (Defendant No.1) (c) : OnePlus Cyanogen Inc. and CyanogenMod LLC (Defendants No.2 &3) FAO (OS) No.540/2014 2. Micromax is the protagonist and OnePlus is the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE20H DAY OF JANUARY201430TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19295 of 2009 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. KRISHNAKUMAR, AGED46YEARS, FILM DIRECTOR, THAZHATH MOOTHERI, P.O.GRAMAM-VELIYANCODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.2. RAVI CHALLISSERY, FILM PRODUCER, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S.SEVEN POWER FILMS, KOTTINGAL HOUSE, CHALLISSERY, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE CHALACHITHRA ACADEMY, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. GIREESH KASARAVALLY, CHAIRMAN OF AWARD COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE FILM AWARDS FOR MALAYALAM FILMS2008RESIDING AT NO.176, 6TH CROSS, GANDHI NAGAR, BANGALURU. R1 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN R2 BY SR GOVERNMENT ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-15-2014
FAO-4178-2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-4178-2012 (O&M) Date of decision:15. 1.2014 Manju Devi and others ...Appellants Versus Narender and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Kanhiya Lal, Advocate for Mr.Arun Bansal, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr.RC Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.3- Insurance Company **** Jitendra Chauhan, J.CM-17852-CII-2012 Despite sufficient opportunity, no reply has been filed by the respondents. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 103 days in re-filing the instant appeal is hereby condoned. FAO-4178-2012 1. The present appeal has been filed by the claimant-appellants, seeking enhancement of the compensation amount awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani (for short 'the Shanker Gauri 2014.01.16 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this do...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
CRA No.D-229-DBA of 2001 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.D-229-DBA of 2001 Date of decision: January 09, 2014 State of Punjab .................Appellant versus 1. Budh Singh son of Hari Singh son of Hakam Singh, aged 74 years, agriculturist, resident of Indra Basti Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur (dead, appeal abated against him in terms of Section 394 (1) Cr.P.C. vide order dated 09.09.2013).2. Jagrup Singh son of Budh Singh,, aged 31 years, agriculturist, resident of Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur 3. Manmeet Singh son of Daljit Singh, aged 26 years, agriculturist resident of Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur. .............Respondents. Criminal Revision No.455 of 2001 Date of decision: January 09, 2014 Hardev Singh son of Bant Singh, resident of village Higarwal, District Sangrur .................Petitioner versus 1. The State of Punjab 2. Budh Singh son of Hari Singh son of Hakam Singh, aged 74 Sunder Sham years, agriculturist, resident of In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE30H DAY OF JANUARY201410TH MAGHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2628 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA3742012 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN695001.2. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695033.3. JOINT COMMISSIONER MUSEUM, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695033.4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695039. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------- P. ABDUL MAJEED, S/O.MOHAMMED, PARAKKAL HOUSE, VADAKKAMANNA, PO KODUR MALAPPURAM676504. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND SMT.L.AMMU PILLAI SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE30H DAY OF JANUARY201410TH MAGHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2628 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA3742012 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN695001.2. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695033.3. JOINT COMMISSIONER MUSEUM, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695033.4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695039. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------- P. ABDUL MAJEED, S/O.MOHAMMED, PARAKKAL HOUSE, VADAKKAMANNA, PO KODUR MALAPPURAM676504. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND SMT.L.AMMU PILLAI SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE30H DAY OF JANUARY201410TH MAGHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 2628 of 2013 (Z) ----------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA3742012 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PETITIONER(S): -------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN695001.2. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695033.3. JOINT COMMISSIONER MUSEUM, COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695033.4. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695039. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------- P. ABDUL MAJEED, S/O.MOHAMMED, PARAKKAL HOUSE, VADAKKAMANNA, PO KODUR MALAPPURAM676504. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND SMT.L.AMMU PILLAI SMT.L.ANNAPOORNA...
Tag this Judgment!