Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 11,2014 + CRL.A. 234/2013 SHISH RAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate for the appellant with appellant in J.C. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Mahesh Kumar, PS S.B.Dairy Complainant Smt.Preeti Sharma in person with Mr.Ajay Garg, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. There are seven deadly sins : wrath, avarice, sloth, pride, lust, envy and drunkenness. But in the modern society we find that some of them have contrived to pass themselves off as virtues. For instance avarice has rebaptized itself as thrift and pride as self-respect. Envy claims to be the corner-stone upon which the present eras competitive system is founded. But one out of the seven vices continues to be unfortunate. It remains undisguised and does not even make an atte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 10, 2014 % + CRL.A.1431/2014 RAKESH @ TONI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Balbir Singh, PTC Jharoda Kalan and SI Mahender Partap, PS Sultan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 has three parts. Under the heading Relevance of Facts Part-I contains sections which guide the court in determining as to which facts would be relevant at a trial to determine the facts in issue. Under the heading On Proof Part-II contains sections which guide the court in determining how relevant facts or facts in issue have to be proved, and which would include documents. It contains provisions concerning presumptions pertaining to documents. Under the heading Production and Effect of Evidence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 08, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1065/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with SI Dalip Kumar, Spl.Cell/NDR. versus BASHIR AHMED PONNU & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The State is aggrieved by the decision of the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the respondents Bashir Ahmed Ponnu, Fayaz Ahmed Lone, Abdul Majeed Baba and Shahid Gafoor for the offences punishable under Section 120B/121/121-A/122/123 IPC & Section 17/18/20/21/23 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (in short the UAP Act), acquitting Bashir Ahmed for offence punishable under Section 489(B)/489 (C) of IPC and Shahid Gafoor for offences punishable under Section 186/353/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-19-2014
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 19, 2014 + CRL.A. 50/2014 SINGH RAJ Represented by: STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Dinkar Verma, Advocate versus ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.Raman, SHO/PS Mehraulli SI Bijender Singh Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate for R2 and R-3 Mr.Sushil Kumar Jain, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A.No.50/2014 For the reasons stated in the application the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. Crl.A.No.50/2014 1. Complainant is the appellant and his grievance is that respondents 2 to 4 have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326/34 IPC. He desires that the respondents should be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the appellant urges that the impugned order dated January 21, 2013 would show that the l...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 487 of 2014 with I.A.No. 6222 of 2014 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary having office at Jharkhand Mantralaya, Project Bhawan, HEC Township, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Nepal House, PO & PS- Doranda, District- Ranchi 3. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, PO & PS- Chaibasa, District- West Singhbhum ... Appellants/Respondents Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Limited through the General Manager (liason) Mr. Debananda Marndi, son of late Balai Marndi, resident of Room No. 26, IEH, SAIL Satellite Township, PO- Dhurwa, PS- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand, having office at ISPAT Bhawan, Raw Materials Division, Steel Authority of India Limited, Ranchi, PO & PS- Doranda, District- Ranchi ...Respondent/Petitioner 2. The Jharkhand State Election Commission, through its Secretary, Nirwach...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Dec-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5225 of 2014 ..... M/s Tata Steel Ltd. an existing Company incorporated under the Companies Act through Mrs. Meena Lall wife of Shri Behari Lall, working as Chief Legal Services having registered office at 24, Homi Mody Street, PO Fort, PS Fort, Town & District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having its Steel Plant and Office at Jamshedpur, PO & PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum ... ... ... ..... ..... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Gelogy, Nepal House, PO & PS- Doranda, District-Ranchi 2. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, PO & PS- Chaibasa, District-West Singhbhum 3. Election Commission of India through Chief Electoral Officer-cum-Principal Secretary, Cabinet(Election) Department having its Office at Sector-2, PO & PS Dhurwa Town & District-Ranchi ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : ORDER : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2005 Natwar Lal & Ors. Vs. Shri Prahlad Singh & Ors. Date of Order ::18. 11.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner/s. Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the respondent/s. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs seeking amendment in the plaint has been rejected. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the petitioners filed a suit for possession, damages and permanent injunction against Prahlad Singh and Dalpat Singh regarding property known as 'Shahji Ka Bagicha' situated at Ward No.8, Kuchaman City. It was inter-alia claimed that the Western portion of the property was on rent with Nobal Senior Secondary School, about 1/2 Eastern portion is on rent with Commercial Taxes Department and Sheep & Wool Department and 1/2 Southern po...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-09-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD)No.138 of 2009 Murugesan .Appellant/ Sole Accused versus The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Andipatti Police Station, Theni District. (Crime No.350 of 2006).Respondent/ Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 04.02.2009 passed in Sessions Case No.91 of 2007 by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Theni District at Theni. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham ^For Respondent : Mr.R.Ramachandran, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the conviction and sentence dated 04.02.2009 passed in Sessions Case No.91 of 2007 by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Theni. 2.The crux of the case of the prosecution is that the accused is the husband of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-26-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 01.10.2009 Coram:- The Honble Mr. Justice R.REGUPATHI Crl.O.P. Nos.33757, 33881, 34416, 10367, 10524 & 10536/05, 4699, 7496, 7765, 17258, 150 & 720 of 2006 & Crl.R.C. No.710/2006 and Miscellaneous Petition Nos.9552 of 2005 etc. Crl.O.P. No.33757 of 2005 1. A.M. Rathinam 2. Perarasu 3. Actor Vijai Petitioners Vs. S. Sellapandian, B.A. B.L., Advocate. Respondent Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in C.C. No.1100 of 2005, on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi, and quash the same. For petitioners : Mr.V.Bhiman, for M/s.Sampathkumar Associates. For respondents : Mr.S.Prabakaran COMMON JUDGMENT Alleging opprobrious visual artistic work designed against lawyers and legal profession in a Tamil movie called Sivakasi, pocketful private complaints came to be filed against the Producer, Director and Actor of the movie before various Judicial Magistrate Courts in the State and to qu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on : Dec-04-2014
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU OWP No. 1275 OF2014AND OWP No. 1395 OF20141 Atman College of Education &ors 2 Shri Sai Shyam College of Education Petitioners University of Jammu and ors Respondent !Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohsin Bhat, Advocate ^Mr. W.S.Nargal, Advocate. Honble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal-Judge Date:04. 12.2014 :JUDGMENT :1. Petitioners are private/non-Government B. Ed. Colleges affiliated with the University of Jammu, respondent No. 1 (for short the University). They have been allowed different intake of students. Faced with the evil of nonattendance of students in the B. Ed. Colleges, the University by virtue of a decision taken in the 6th meeting of its College Development Council (CDC), respondent No. 4, held on 03.07.2014 has devised a formula to reduce the intake seats of these colleges for the session 2014-2015 proportionate to the level of non-attendance noticed in the course of two 2 inspections held during the previous session. Pursuan...
Tag this Judgment!