Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-23-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:23. 01-2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Civil Suit No.562 of 2007 M.C.Jayasingh ...Plaintiff Vs 1. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited (MIDHANI) rep.by its Managing Director, Kanchanbagh Hyderabad 500 058.2. Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills Road Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.3. Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited Ali Towers, IV Floor, 55, Greams Road Chennai 600 006.4. Cancer Institute (W.I.A) (Regional Cancer Centre), Canal Bank Road Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. ...Defendants ----- Plaint under Order VII, Rule 1, CPC, read with Order IV, Rule of the Original Side Rules, Section 108 read with Section 50(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 and Section 22(2)(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. ----- For Plaintiff : Mr.M.Sundar For Defendant-1 : Mr.V.Chandrakanthan For Defendants 2&3 : Mr.C.Manishankar For Defendant-4 : Mr.N.L.Rajah ----- JUDGMENT This is a suit for infringement of patents and designs and for rendition of accounts ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: January 23, 2014 + CS(OS) No.2617/2010 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PVT. LTD...... Plaintiff Through Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocate versus DHARA DAIRY FOODS CO. ..... Respondent Through Defendant is ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The defendant is ex-parte. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff, Mother Diary Fruit and Vegetable Pvt. Ltd, for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the defendant.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that it is the registered proprietor of the well known trademark DHARA and has various registrations for the said mark under Class 29. The details of the said registrations in respect of the mark DHARA have been given in Para 13 of the plaint. Some of them are: registration in respect of DHARA Refined Vegetable Oil under class 29 bearing registration N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jan-23-2014
1. This review petition has been filed for review of orderdated 18.7.2007 passed in W.P. (PIL) No. 3621 of 2007. 2. The case as made out by the writ petitioner in the œPublic Interest Litigation? being W.P. (PIL) No. 3621 of 2007 is as under: The land appertaining to khata no. 334 plot nos. 1445 and 1446 is a property of Central Government as it is recorded as œKeshr-e-Hind? in the last Cadastral survey completed prior to 1910. The writ petitioner/first respondent came to know that the then Circle Officer illegally issued rent receipts in favour of one Shiv Narayan Jaiswal and Jagat Narayan Jaiswal by settling the same in their names and the said Shiv Narayan Jaiswal and Jagat Narayan Jaiswal have got no piece of land within the Bagodar Circle and at no point of time they were resident of Bagodar Police Station. It is further submitted that the œKeshar-e-Hind? land cannot be settled with anybody who were not resident of the area. While so, Shiv Narayan Jaiswal and oth...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, petitioner seeks an order and direction against respondents to deposit monies to the extent of the claims of the petitioner under Share Subscription Agreement and Share Holders Agreement including the investment of approximately US$ 60 million and cost and/or in the alternative to provide adequate and satisfactory security in regard to the claims of the petitioner. Petitioner also claims disclosure of all the assets, moneys, bank deposits and accounts held by the respondents singly or jointly and/or severally including but not limited to the accounts with Corporation Bank by an affidavit. Petitioner seeks injunction restraining the respondents from dealing with their assets including bank accounts with Corporation Bank. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under :- 2 (a) Petitioner is a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and has its registered offic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE22D DAY OF JANUARY20142ND MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 1474 of 2014 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER : ---------- NOUFAL, AGED24YEARS, S/O.KUNHIMUHAMMED, THEKKANCHERY HOUSE, PERASANNUR, KUTTIPURAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR RESPONDENTS : ----------- 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN686101.2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALANCHERY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN686552. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON2201-2014 ALONG WITH WP(C) NO. 1475/2014 & CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: BP P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J............................................................................... W.P.(C)No.1474, 1475, 1507 & 1514 OF2014......................................................................... Dated ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
Vadm M.P. Muralidharan, Member (A): 1. The first applicant is a registered Association of Ex Navy Direct Entry Artificers and the other four are all Ex Direct Entry Artificers of the Navy (hereinafter referred to as the applicants). The applicants two to five, were discharged from the Navy after their initial engagement period of 10 years. As per applicants, they were placed 10 years in Fleet Reserve. The applicants were not given pension on their release from service, but have now sought pension based on the fact that they were placed in Fleet Reserve for 10 years and 50% of the period of reserve would accrue towards pension. While a request for pension was made by the applicants (Annexure A5) to Respondent No.2, vide Annexure A6 they were informed by Respondent No.3 that they were not eligible for pension. The applicants have therefore prayed for setting aside the IHQ, MOD (Navy) letter No.PN/8126/12 dated 25 June 2012 (Annexure A6) denying them pension. They have also prayed to decl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :22. d JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 768/2000 MADAN LAL Through : ....Appellant Mr.Jitendra Sethi, Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Kaushik & Mr.Hemendra Jailia, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY) OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Madan Lal (the appellant) questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.11.2000 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.499/96 arising out of FIR No.214/85 PS Subzi Mandi by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. By an order dated 23.11.2000, he was awarded RI for three years with fine ` 5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 29.04.1985 at about 09.45 P.M. in front of house No.10621, Gali No.6, Andha Mugal, he inflicted injuries to Tara Chand in an attempt to murder him. During the course of investigatio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
1. The Plaintiff has filed the present Suit against the Defendant, inter alia, for a perpetual order and injunction, restraining the Defendant from infringing the registered trademark of the Plaintiff "EVANOVA" and also from passing off their goods/products as those of the Plaintiff by use of the mark "ECONOVA" or any other mark deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs registered mark. By the present Notice of Motion, the Plaintiff has sought a temporary injunction against the Defendant from manufacturing and marketing any medicinal preparations/products by using the mark "ECONOVA". 2. The Plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of ayurvedic medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations. The Plaintiff carries on the said business in the name of a Partnership firm M/s. Charak Bhandar since 1949. The original Plaintiff No.1 i.e. Charak Pharmaceuticals (India) Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated in May, 1970. In 1999, the original Plaintiff No.1 applied for registration and go...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t January, 2014 + CRL.A. 712/2011 ILYASUDDIN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. It is stated that human lust knows no bounds-if there is any truth in it, the present case is a glaring example of such lust. A tiny tot aged about 2-1/2 years has not only fallen a victim of the lust of the appellant but also lost his precious life resulting in conviction of the appellant u/s 377/302 IPC in Sessions Case No.134/2008 u/s 377/302 IPC, P.S. Kapashera and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of 10 years for offence punishable u/s 377 IPC and for imprisonment of life for offence punishable u/s 302 IPC and further directions not to release him before the expiry of 25 years. However, benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C was given to him.2. Succinctly s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE20H DAY OF JANUARY201430TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 19295 of 2009 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- 1. KRISHNAKUMAR, AGED46YEARS, FILM DIRECTOR, THAZHATH MOOTHERI, P.O.GRAMAM-VELIYANCODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.2. RAVI CHALLISSERY, FILM PRODUCER, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S.SEVEN POWER FILMS, KOTTINGAL HOUSE, CHALLISSERY, PALAKKAD. BY ADV. SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. KERALA STATE CHALACHITHRA ACADEMY, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. GIREESH KASARAVALLY, CHAIRMAN OF AWARD COMMITTEE OF KERALA STATE FILM AWARDS FOR MALAYALAM FILMS2008RESIDING AT NO.176, 6TH CROSS, GANDHI NAGAR, BANGALURU. R1 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN R2 BY SR GOVERNMENT ...
Tag this Judgment!