Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-03-2014
1. This is joint petition filed by the Employees' Union and one of its members/ employees challenging the Office Memorandum dtd. 26.06.2009 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Defence by which the House Rent Allowance/Transport Allowance/Small Family Allowance was excluded for the purpose of computing Overtime Allowance admissible to the employees under the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948. 2. The only grievance put forth on behalf of the employees is exclusion of the HRA/Transport Allowance/Small Family Allowance for the purpose of computing Overtime Allowance, which the employees were getting previously by virtue of the provisions of sub-Section 1 and 2 of Section 59 of the Factories Act, 1948, which specifically provides that where a worker who works for more than nine hours in any day or for more than 48 hours in a week, he shall in respect of overtime work be entitled to wages at the rate of twice his ordinary rate of wages. Sub-section (2) explains the term ordinary r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-02-2014
Kalidas Mukherjee, President: 1. This appeal u/s 27A of the C. P. Act is directed against the order no.37 dated 30/07/13 passed by the Learned District Forum, Alipore, South 24-Parganas in EA No.55/2010 recording that the Execution Case was disposed of on full satisfaction. The Complaint Case No.25 of 2009 was allowed on contest directing the OP to handover the printed copies of books to the Complainant within 30 days from date. The OPs were also directed to pay compensation of Rs.500/- and litigation cost of Rs.500/- to the Complainant within 30 days from the date of order, in default the OP shall pay penalty of Rs.25/- per day from the date of default till the compliance of the order. The Learned District Forum in the impugned order in connection with EA 55 of 2010 recorded that the litigation cost and compensation were paid. It was further recorded that vide order no.36 the Dhr was at liberty to take the copies of books and if not received the Jdr shall take back the same and keep i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE2D DAY OF JANUARY201412TH POUSHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 64 of 2014 -------------------------------- C.C NO:718. 2013 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,NILAMBUR. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1-3:- ------------------------------------------------ 1. MUHAMMED NAHEEF, AGED20YEARS, S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.2. NAJEEB, AGED22YEARS, S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.3. DILSHAD, AGED25YEARS. S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.4. NOUFAL, AGED23YEARS, S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:- ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTATED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE1T DAY OF JANUARY201411TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 18074 of 2006 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- T.V.FRANCIS, AGED61 S/O.T.D.VARU, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.NEW MEDICALS, 8/21, OLARIKKARA, PULLAZHI THRISSUR. BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SMT.THANKOM.G RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HEALTH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. ASST.DRUGS CONTROLLER AND LICENSING AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. R1 & 2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0101-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18074 of 2006 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE2D RESPONDENT ON2411.2005 EXT.P2: COPY OF THE DETAILED EXPLANATION ON1812.2005. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED12.20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAATERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY,THE8H DAYOF JANUARY201418TH POUSHA, 1935 Ins.APP.No. 72 of 2011 ( ) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN IC222005 of E.I.COURT,KOLLAM DATED12-10-2010 APPELLANT/APPLICANT: ------------------------------------- F.BASHEER, SAPNA, PERUMATHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR.ADV.SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR ADVS.SRI.LEO GEORGE SRI.K.N.SASIDHARAN NAIR SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR SRI.M.SUNIL RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION PANCHDEEPBHAVAN, NORTH SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR-20.2. M.HABEEBULLAH, C/O.BASHEER, SAPNA, PERUMATHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 032. R-1 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR, SC, ESI CORPN THIS INSURANCE APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0301-2014, THE COURT ON0801-2014 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV C.R. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,J.========================...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY,THE7H DAY OF JANUARY201417TH POUSHA, 1935 WA.No. 1939 of 2013 () IN WP(C).12876/2013 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12876/2013 OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED2705-2013 APPELLANT(S)/1ST AND2D PETITIONERS: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.V.JAYARAJAN, SHOP ASSISTANT, F LI SHOP, SREEKANDAPURAM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DIST(RESIDING AT NARAYANEEYAM) NIDUVALLOOR, CHUZHALI P O, SREEKANDAPURAM, KANNAUR DIST, PIN-670 141.2. V. G SASIDHARAN NAIR, ASSISTANT, KSBC WARE HOUSE, VALANJAVATTOM P O , T S C COMPOUND, THIRUVALLA, RESIDING AT MOOTHEDATH HOUSE, PARIYARAM P O, PUTHUPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST, PIN-686 021. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS & PETITIONERS3TO15 ----------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE7H DAY OF JANUARY201417TH POUSHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 3 of 2014 (Z) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA28102013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED0512-2013 PETITIONER(S)/APPLICANTS:-: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. RASHEED K. KILAYAYIL, AGED45YEARS S/O.KUNJISUPPI, LECTURER, DIET, CURRICULAM MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (CMDE) DIET, RAMAVARMAPURAM P.O., THRISSUR. NOW ON DEPUTATION AS DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, SSA KOZHIKODE, RESIDING AT POOTHERIVALAPPU, THAZHE CHELARI, VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM - 676 317.2. GOPINATHAN K.P., AGED48YEARS S/O.T.P.KRISHNAN NAMBIAR, LECTURER PSTE MALAYALAM DIET KANNUR AT THALASSERY - NOW ON DEPUTATION AS DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICE SSI, KANNUR - RESIDING AT SREELAYAM, THAVAROOL CHENGALAYI P.O., SREEKANDAPURAM, KANNUR - 670 631...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
DBSAW No.575/2004 1 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.575/2004 Prem Chand Naval versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7th January 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.A.K.Choudhary, for the appellant. Dr. P.S.Bhati, AAG with Mr.Rishabh Tayal Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Amit Tatia Mr.Rajesh Joshi ].Mr.D.D.Thanvi ]., for the respondents. BY THE COURT:(Per Dinesh Maheshwari),J. By way of this intra-court appeal, the appellant, who was not a party to the original writ petition (CWP No.5913/2003).seeks to question the order dated 15.07.2004, as passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in disposal of the said writ petition. It is borne out from the record that in this appeal, an application seeking leave to appeal has, of course, been filed by the appellant but then, no order as such granting leave to appeal has been passed, though notices were ordered...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): 1. The applicant of this OA is an officer of Delhi and Andaman Nicobar Islands Civil Service (DANICS, in short), who is before us with the following prayers:- (a) direct the respondents to consider and promote the applicant on adhoc basis to the excadre post equivalent of DANICS w.e.f. 19.10.2011 and if in the event he is not found fit on the said date, then w.e.f. 14.11.2012 with all consequential benefits and grant all benefits consequent thereto to the applicant as being given to his juniors consequent to their promotion vide order dated 19.10.2011 or 14.11.2012 (as the case may be). (b) award costs of the proceedings and (c) pass any other order/direction which this Honble Tribunal deem fit and proper in favour of the applicant and against the respondents in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The applicant was initially appointed as Grade-II/Delhi Administration Subordinate Services (DASS, in short) on 14.08.1986. He was promoted to DASS Grade-I o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY,THE6H DAY OF JANUARY201416TH POUSHA, 1935 OP(C).No. 4658 of 2013 (O) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A. 2020/2013 IN L.A.R. 762011 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED0212.2013 PETITIONER: ------------------- GEORGE P.CHERUKOTH AGED57YEARS S/O. LATE C.PAULOSE, CHERUKOTH HOUSE, LAYAM ROAD ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM-682031.2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INFOR PARK, KUSUMAGIRI, KAKKANAD-682030.3. C.V.GOPI S/O. NARAYAN KURUP, 28/1824A, PANDARACHIRA ROAD KADAVANTHRA-682020. R3 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.LAIJU C. STEPHEN R2 BY SMT.RASHMI. K.V., SC, INFOPARK THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0601-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C).No. 4658 of 2013 (O) -----------------------...
Tag this Judgment!