Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-03-2014
1. This is joint petition filed by the Employees' Union and one of its members/ employees challenging the Office Memorandum dtd. 26.06.2009 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Defence by which the House Rent Allowance/Transport Allowance/Small Family Allowance was excluded for the purpose of computing Overtime Allowance admissible to the employees under the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948. 2. The only grievance put forth on behalf of the employees is exclusion of the HRA/Transport Allowance/Small Family Allowance for the purpose of computing Overtime Allowance, which the employees were getting previously by virtue of the provisions of sub-Section 1 and 2 of Section 59 of the Factories Act, 1948, which specifically provides that where a worker who works for more than nine hours in any day or for more than 48 hours in a week, he shall in respect of overtime work be entitled to wages at the rate of twice his ordinary rate of wages. Sub-section (2) explains the term ordinary r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on : Jan-02-2014
Kalidas Mukherjee, President: 1. This appeal u/s 27A of the C. P. Act is directed against the order no.37 dated 30/07/13 passed by the Learned District Forum, Alipore, South 24-Parganas in EA No.55/2010 recording that the Execution Case was disposed of on full satisfaction. The Complaint Case No.25 of 2009 was allowed on contest directing the OP to handover the printed copies of books to the Complainant within 30 days from date. The OPs were also directed to pay compensation of Rs.500/- and litigation cost of Rs.500/- to the Complainant within 30 days from the date of order, in default the OP shall pay penalty of Rs.25/- per day from the date of default till the compliance of the order. The Learned District Forum in the impugned order in connection with EA 55 of 2010 recorded that the litigation cost and compensation were paid. It was further recorded that vide order no.36 the Dhr was at liberty to take the copies of books and if not received the Jdr shall take back the same and keep i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN THURSDAY, THE2D DAY OF JANUARY201412TH POUSHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 64 of 2014 -------------------------------- C.C NO:718. 2013 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,NILAMBUR. PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1-3:- ------------------------------------------------ 1. MUHAMMED NAHEEF, AGED20YEARS, S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.2. NAJEEB, AGED22YEARS, S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.3. DILSHAD, AGED25YEARS. S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.4. NOUFAL, AGED23YEARS, S/O ABHUBACKER, THANGAYATHIL(H), VADAPURAM P.O, MAMPAD VILLAGE, MALAPPURAM VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:- ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTATED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE1T DAY OF JANUARY201411TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 18074 of 2006 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: ----------- T.V.FRANCIS, AGED61 S/O.T.D.VARU, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.NEW MEDICALS, 8/21, OLARIKKARA, PULLAZHI THRISSUR. BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SMT.THANKOM.G RESPONDENTS: ------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HEALTH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. ASST.DRUGS CONTROLLER AND LICENSING AUTHORITY, THRISSUR. R1 & 2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0101-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 18074 of 2006 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE2D RESPONDENT ON2411.2005 EXT.P2: COPY OF THE DETAILED EXPLANATION ON1812.2005. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED12.20...
Tag this Judgment!