Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : ORDER : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2005 Natwar Lal & Ors. Vs. Shri Prahlad Singh & Ors. Date of Order ::18. 11.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner/s. Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the respondent/s. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs seeking amendment in the plaint has been rejected. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the petitioners filed a suit for possession, damages and permanent injunction against Prahlad Singh and Dalpat Singh regarding property known as 'Shahji Ka Bagicha' situated at Ward No.8, Kuchaman City. It was inter-alia claimed that the Western portion of the property was on rent with Nobal Senior Secondary School, about 1/2 Eastern portion is on rent with Commercial Taxes Department and Sheep & Wool Department and 1/2 Southern po...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Nov-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR : ORDER : S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3324/2005 Natwar Lal & Ors. Vs. Shri Prahlad Singh & Ors. Date of Order ::18. 11.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Arpit Bhoot, for the petitioner/s. Mr. S.P. Sharma, for the respondent/s. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition is directed against the order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs seeking amendment in the plaint has been rejected. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the petitioners filed a suit for possession, damages and permanent injunction against Prahlad Singh and Dalpat Singh regarding property known as 'Shahji Ka Bagicha' situated at Ward No.8, Kuchaman City. It was inter-alia claimed that the Western portion of the property was on rent with Nobal Senior Secondary School, about 1/2 Eastern portion is on rent with Commercial Taxes Department and Sheep & Wool Department and 1/2 Southern po...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Aug-19-2014
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLN. NO.85/2013 M/S.Lakhlan & Qureshi Construction Co.versus The Resident Engineer, RHB, Division Pali-Marwar DATE OF ORDER : 19.8.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Shri Surajbhan Lakhlan, Partner of applicant firm Shri H.R.Naval, Resident Engineer & OIC, RHB, Division Pali ..BY THE COURT : By order dated 23.12.2009 the Resident Engineer, Rajasthan Housing Board, Division Pali Marwar awarded a work relating to construction of MIG (B)-30 nos Houses, Pindwara. to the applicant firm. As per the applicant, the entire work was completed, though, a delay of few days occurred but that was attributable to the respondents. A bill then was submitted for the escalated amount but of no consequence. Looking to all the circumstances, a request was made by the applicant on 30.9.2013 to refer the dispute to the Standing Committee for its resolution. No action thereupon was taken, hence this app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Apr-24-2014
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Narayan Singh versus State of Rajasthan D.B.Criminal Jail Appeal No.1105/2004 against the judgment dated 26.10.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track).Jalore, in Sessions Case No.[33/2004].68/2004. Date of Judgment :: 24th April, 2014 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN Mr.M.K.Garg, for the appellant. Mr.Vishnu Kachhawaha, Public Prosecutor, for the State...BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE MATHUR,J.) This appeal is directed to challenge the judgment dated 26.10.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track).Jalore recording conviction of accused Narayan Singh for the offence punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and awarding sentence to undergo life term imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1000/- with default stipulation. The factual matrix necessary to be noticed is that Shri Kapuraram, real brother of accused Narayan Singh, submitted a writt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1524/2013 Girja Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:03. 02/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1524/2013 Girja Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::03. d February 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Pritam Solanki, for the petitioner. -- BY THE COURT:1. The petitioner in the present writ petition has called in question the impugned transfer order dated 12.02.2013 (Annex.4), whereby the petitioner who was working as 'Prabodhak' (Teacher) at Government Secondary School, Chimana to a school (Govt. Primary School, Arnadiya), which was not in existence as on the date of such transfer as one Sh. Navla Ram, donated land measuring 3 Bigha of Khasra No.56/3 for setting up of the school.2. The ground of attack on the said transfer order is that the petitioner has been transferred at a place where actually the school was not even establis...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
DBSAW No.575/2004 1 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.575/2004 Prem Chand Naval versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7th January 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.A.K.Choudhary, for the appellant. Dr. P.S.Bhati, AAG with Mr.Rishabh Tayal Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Amit Tatia Mr.Rajesh Joshi ].Mr.D.D.Thanvi ]., for the respondents. BY THE COURT:(Per Dinesh Maheshwari),J. By way of this intra-court appeal, the appellant, who was not a party to the original writ petition (CWP No.5913/2003).seeks to question the order dated 15.07.2004, as passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in disposal of the said writ petition. It is borne out from the record that in this appeal, an application seeking leave to appeal has, of course, been filed by the appellant but then, no order as such granting leave to appeal has been passed, though notices were ordered...
Tag this Judgment!