Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID MONDAY, THE20H DAY OF JANUARY201430TH POUSHA, 1935 RFA.No. 499 of 2004 (B) ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS14141994 of PRL.SUB COURT,TRIVANDRUM DATED3007-2003 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/DEFENDANTS IN O.S:: ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT.SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ROADS & BRIDGES (SOUTH CIRCLE) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF IN O.S:: ----------------------------------------- P.S.THULASI BAI, D/O. SARADA, AGED47 PADINJATTATHIL HOUSE, PERUMGUZHI P.O. CHIRAYINKIL TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON2001-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWIN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
1. Heard Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of the appellant as well as Mr. Lalsawirema, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Mizoram. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.8.2012 passed by the learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge-IV, Aizawl in SR No. 7/2010 under Section 376 (1) IPC whereby the accused Zorama was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 30 days. 3. The case of the prosecution is that on 7.10.2010 one Vanlalruati lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-charge, Kulikawn Police Station stating that beginning from September 2008 till October, 2010, her granddaughter Lalrinsangi (14) daughter of Lalthanmawia of Chaltlang was threatened and sexually abused by her husband Zorama (46), Gorkhali by birth. She came to learn of these incidents while taking her granddaughter for a medical check up a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.157 OF201417-01-2014 Tahmeena Kaleem and others....Petitioners State of A.P.rep.by Public Prosecutor...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Nageshwara Rao Pappu Counsel for the Respondents:Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: 1.(2010) 7 SCC6672. AIR2000SC23241) 3. 2005(2) ALD (Crl.) 633(SC) 4. (2013) 5 SCC226HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.157 OF2014ORDER:- The petitioners A9 to A12 are seeking anticipatory bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act read with 34 IPC. The de facto complainant MRS.Syeda Saba was married to Mohammed Bin Issaq A1 on 05.09.2011. She alleges that at the time of her marriage, her father gave 40 tulas of gold and Rs.10.00 lakhs as dowry. After the marriage, her husband and in-laws treated her well for few days and thereafter started harassing her demanding to bring additional dowry. It is also her case that she ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY, THE17H DAY OF JANUARY201427TH POUSHA, 1935 WA.No. 1453 of 2010 IN WP(C).15732/2006 ---------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15732/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1103.2010 APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS1TO4IN WP(C): - -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL(A&E), KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY Sr. GOVERNMENT PLEADER Sri. NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN WP(C): - ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.A.THANKAMMA, (RETD DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, ERNAKULAM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY,THE17H DAY OF JANUARY201427TH POUSHA, 1935 WA.No. 1309 of 2011 ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 29152/2009, DATED0306-2011 ------------ APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS IN THE WP: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI.K., ATTENDANT, KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD LTD, MUDAVOOR PO, MUVATTUPUZHA , ERNAKULAM.2. RAJENDRAN. U, DO..DO..3. SANIL KUMAR M.S, ATTENDANT, MATTUPETTY INDO SWISS PROJECT, KLD BOARD, MATTUPETTY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUGATHAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN THE WP: --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695001 .2. KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, GOK...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
Suneet Kumar, J. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner company through its Director had obtained a term loan of Rs. 1,80,00,000/- payable in seven years and a cash credit limit facility to the tune of Rs.70,00,000/- from the respondent Bank in 2008. To secure the aforesaid loan/facility on behalf of the borrowers, the company created security interest in respect of the following properties: Primary Security: I) Cold Storage Land located at Gata No.329 and 330 Mauza Pihura, Sadabad, Dist. Mahamaya Nagar valued for Rs.16.60 lacs. II) Cold Storage Building and Hypothecation of Plant and Machinery valued at Rs.91.88 lacs. Collateral Security: I) Residential House at 9, Civil Lines, Mathura, U.P belonging to Shri Mahesh Chandra Gautam valued for Rs.73.00 lacs. II) Charge on Agricultural Land situated at Khasra No. 191 and 192, Village Maharara, Sadabad, Mahamaya Nagar valued for Rs.48.00 lacs. III) Charge on Agricultural Land situated at Khata ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :9. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 397/2003 GULSHAN SHARMA & ORS. ....Appellants Through : Mr.R.K.Thakur, Advocate with Mr.B.Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Gulshan Sharma (A-1), Harish Sharma (A-2) and Kamni Sharma (A-3) challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 03.03.2003 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.41/00 arising out of FIR No.543/00 PS Rajouri Garden whereby they were convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC. By an order on sentence dated 05.03.2003, they were awarded RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/-, each. The prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet is as follows :2. On 01.06.2000, Rajeev Taneja had gone at the residence of the accused persons to demand payment which A-1 had failed to pay being member of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-16-2014
CR No.7243 of 2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) CR No.7243 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.01.2014 Rajinder Kumar ......Petitioner Versus Diwan Chand and others .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SABINA, J. Respondent No.1 had filed ejectment petition against Suraj Bhan (deceased) through his legal representatives with regard to the shop in question on the ground of personal necessity and arrears of rent under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (in short 'Act').Case of respondent No.1, in brief, was that respondent No.1 and his nephew Eric Lal were owners of the property in question. The property in question was let out on rent to Suraj Bhan for running a barber shop at a monthly rent of ` 33.50 ps. and house tax @ ` 60/- per year. After the death of Suraj Bhan, his legal heirs came in possession of the shop. However, the tenant was Sandee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13459 of 1993(O&M) Date of decision:16.01.2014 Hospital Administrator, Salvation Army Macrobert Hospital Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur..Petitioner Versus The Authority under the Minimum Wages Act and Labour-cum- Conciliation Officer, Gurdaspur, and another..Respondents CORAM: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present:- Mr.Gurdeep Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. No.2. To be referred to the reporters or not ?. No.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. No.---- K.Kannan, J. 1. The writ petition challenges the order passed by the authorities under the Minimum Wages Act upholding the claim of the workman that the difference of the amount actually paid and the amount that was liable to be paid as minimum wage amounting to `10,426.45 by the Management to the workman. This amount of `10,426....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-15-2014
FAO-4178-2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-4178-2012 (O&M) Date of decision:15. 1.2014 Manju Devi and others ...Appellants Versus Narender and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN Present: Mr.Kanhiya Lal, Advocate for Mr.Arun Bansal, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr.RC Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.3- Insurance Company **** Jitendra Chauhan, J.CM-17852-CII-2012 Despite sufficient opportunity, no reply has been filed by the respondents. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 103 days in re-filing the instant appeal is hereby condoned. FAO-4178-2012 1. The present appeal has been filed by the claimant-appellants, seeking enhancement of the compensation amount awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani (for short 'the Shanker Gauri 2014.01.16 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this do...
Tag this Judgment!