Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY,THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY201414TH MAGHA, 1935 WA.No. 173 of 2014 () IN WP(C).4157/2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4157/2008 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED0411-2011 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS1TO6IN THE WRIT PETITION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. (FINANCE) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. HIGHER EDUCATION SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.4. THE DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.5. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, REGIONAL DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE.6. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, PALAKKAD. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS AND7H ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1524/2013 Girja Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:03. 02/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1524/2013 Girja Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::03. d February 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr. Pritam Solanki, for the petitioner. -- BY THE COURT:1. The petitioner in the present writ petition has called in question the impugned transfer order dated 12.02.2013 (Annex.4), whereby the petitioner who was working as 'Prabodhak' (Teacher) at Government Secondary School, Chimana to a school (Govt. Primary School, Arnadiya), which was not in existence as on the date of such transfer as one Sh. Navla Ram, donated land measuring 3 Bigha of Khasra No.56/3 for setting up of the school.2. The ground of attack on the said transfer order is that the petitioner has been transferred at a place where actually the school was not even establis...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN MONDAY,THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY201414TH MAGHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 134 of 2014 () -------------------------- CRL.MP.NO. 6318/2013 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM --------------- PETITIONER/RESPONDENT : ------------------------------------------ ABOOBACKER P.M., AGED42YEARS PANKULANGARA MUNDETHU HOUSE, WEST VENGOLA P.O. PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM - 683556 BY ADV. SRI.FRANKLIN CHELLATH RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER & STATE : ---------------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S. INDUSIND BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY PARTHISH JUNIOR EXECUTIVE LEGAL & POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER AGED36YEARS, S/O. SANKARA PILLAI, RESIDING AT BLOCK NO.3 GALLAXY EDIFICE, VAZHAKKALA - 682024.2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R1 BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SEENA RAMAKRISHNAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY,THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY201414TH MAGHA, 1935 OP(KAT).NO. 9 OF2014(Z) ----------------------------------- T.A.NO. 2981/2012 OF KERALA ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED0811-2013. ------ PETITIONER/APPLICANT: -------------------------------------- D.CHRISTOPHER RAJ, AGED61YEARS, S/O.DEIVAPILLAI, RESIDING AT VIJAYA COTTAGE, ERACHAPPARA, DEVIKULAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT (RETIRED SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT, SCHEDULED CAST DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM). BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: ------------------------------------------------ 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIGILANCE (D) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.2. THE DIRECTOR, DISTRICT SCHEDULED CAST DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANATHAPURAM-695 001.3. DISTRICT SCHEDULE CAST DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, IDU...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Decided on : Jan-31-2014
Shrikant Tripathi, Member (J): 1. The applicant, M.K. Mishra, Ex POELP No. 169764-B filed this Original Application (appeal) challenging the verdict of the Court Martial, whereby he was found guilty of the charge under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 and was accordingly dismissed from the service. 2. In this order we will not disclose the identity of the victim and so she will be referred to as the 'victim'. The names of her parents will also not be disclosed and they will be referred to as 'father' or 'mother', as the case may be. 3. The story leading to the trial of the applicant is that on 9th February, 2008 at about 15.50 hrs., he met the victim and her sister, while they were going to the shopping complex at Sailors Married Accommodation for recharging their mobile phone. He offered them a lift to the shopping complex. Both the victim and her sister accepted his offer as they were taking tuition along with his daughter with the sa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-31-2014
Crl. Appeal Nos. D-783-DB of 2009 and other cases -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :31. 1.2014. Crl. Appeal No.D-783-DB of 2009 Surjit Singh and others ........ Appellants Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent Crl. Appeal No.D-790-DB of 2009 Kartar Singh and others ........ Appellants Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent Crl. Appeal No.D-815-DB of 2009 Gurpal Singh @ Hargopal Singh ........ Appellant Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent Crl. Appeal No.D-931-DB of 2009 Labh Singh and others ...... Appellants Versus State of Punjab .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH Present:- Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate, with, Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellants, in CRA No.D-783-DB of 2009. Mr. D.S. Brar, Advocate, for the appellants, in CRA No.D-790-DB of 2009. Sharma Sanjiv Kumar 2014.02.20 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Crl. Appeal Nos...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : Jan-31-2014
The appeal is filed against Judgment and order of Special Case No.66/2010, which was pending in the Children's Court created for the State for Goa at Panaji-Goa. The appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under section 354 I.P.C. and he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-. He is also convicted for offence punishable under section 8 (2) of the Goa Children's Act, 2003 and he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment of six months and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-. Both the sides are heard. 2. In short, the facts leading to the institution of the appeal can be said as follows: The offence is committed against a girl child who was aged about 4 years at the relevant time. The accused was aged about 29 years and he was a married man. The father of the girl child was working as a security guard in campus known as œTropical Estate Private Ltd? at Morod, Sangolda and this complex is situated within the local jurisdiction o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-31-2014
LPA No.2053 of 2011 & -:1. - other connected matters IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH1 LPA No.2053 of 2011 in CWP No.12796 of 2008 Date of decision : January 31, 2014 Chandigarh Administration & another ......Appellants Versus Mrs. Neera Goyal & Ors. ...... Respondents 2. LPA No.2078 of 2011 in CWP No.14316 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration & Ors. ......Appellants Versus H. L. Vij & another ...... Respondents 3. LPA No.2079 of 2011 in CWP No.12865 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration & Ors. ......Appellants Versus Vishnu Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...... Respondents 4. LPA No.2118 of 2011 in CWP No.12838 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration ......Appellant Versus M/s Bhushan Power and Steel Limited & Ors. ...... Respondents Chander Vikas 2014.02.07 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh LPA No.2053 of 2011 & -:2. - other connected matters 5. LPA No.2036 of 2011 in CWP No.14176 of 2008 Chandigarh Administration & Ors. ......Appellants Ve...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jan-31-2014
1. This Public Interest Litigation was initially filed by one Ashim Kumar Samanta, who was made a party- Respondent in the present proceeding by order dated 06.02.2013, seeking a direction upon the Central Bureau of Investigation to investigate the alleged bungling committed in the Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Examination conducted in the year, 2011 for admission in the Medical colleges of the State of Jharkhand. 2. The allegations made by the impleaded Respondent no.15 in the writ petition were found frivolous and it was observed by this Court that the Respondent no.15 has been set up at the behest of the Respondent no.16, Narayan Hansda. The order dated 06.02.2013 reads as under: œLearned counsel for the respondent no. 11 has serious allegation with respect to bonafide of the petitioner as well as reason for filing the petition in the name of P.I.L. in violation to the Jharkhand High Court (Public Interest Litigation) Rules, 2010. Respondent's allegations against the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-30-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:30. 01.2014 + Crl.Appeal No.392/2010 JAI YODHAD Through: .Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Prateek, Advs. Versus STATE Through: .Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 8.7.2008, SI Sunil Jain of Narcotic Branch received secret information that a person named Jai, resident of Nepal, who is engaged in bringing Ganja from Nepal to Delhi and selling the same, in association with one Norbu, will meet Norbu between 6.30 pm to 7 pm on that date at Railway Crossing, Shalimar Village and a huge quantity of Ganja would be supplied. The aforesaid information was brought by SI Sunil Jain to the notice of Inspector M.L. Sharma of Narcotic Branch and he also produced the informer before him. After making inquiries from the informer, Inspector M.L. Sharma brought the information to the notice of the concerned ACP Mr. M.S. Dabas on telephone. The said ACP directed him to conduc...
Tag this Judgment!