Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE8H DAYOF JANUARY201418TH POUSHA, 1935 WA.No. 1827 of 2013 () IN WP(C).26607/2006 -------------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26607/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED15 10-2012 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS2TO4IN WPC : ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, VIKAS BHAVAN, P.M.J.JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS & 1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. ST.PETER'S COLLEGE TRUST, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
DBSAW No.575/2004 1 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.575/2004 Prem Chand Naval versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7th January 2014. PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE V.K.MATHUR Mr.A.K.Choudhary, for the appellant. Dr. P.S.Bhati, AAG with Mr.Rishabh Tayal Mr.M.S.Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Amit Tatia Mr.Rajesh Joshi ].Mr.D.D.Thanvi ]., for the respondents. BY THE COURT:(Per Dinesh Maheshwari),J. By way of this intra-court appeal, the appellant, who was not a party to the original writ petition (CWP No.5913/2003).seeks to question the order dated 15.07.2004, as passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in disposal of the said writ petition. It is borne out from the record that in this appeal, an application seeking leave to appeal has, of course, been filed by the appellant but then, no order as such granting leave to appeal has been passed, though notices were ordered...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY,THE7H DAY OF JANUARY201417TH POUSHA, 1935 WA.No. 1939 of 2013 () IN WP(C).12876/2013 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12876/2013 OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED2705-2013 APPELLANT(S)/1ST AND2D PETITIONERS: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1. K.V.JAYARAJAN, SHOP ASSISTANT, F LI SHOP, SREEKANDAPURAM, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DIST(RESIDING AT NARAYANEEYAM) NIDUVALLOOR, CHUZHALI P O, SREEKANDAPURAM, KANNAUR DIST, PIN-670 141.2. V. G SASIDHARAN NAIR, ASSISTANT, KSBC WARE HOUSE, VALANJAVATTOM P O , T S C COMPOUND, THIRUVALLA, RESIDING AT MOOTHEDATH HOUSE, PARIYARAM P O, PUTHUPALLY, KOTTAYAM DIST, PIN-686 021. BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS & PETITIONERS3TO15 ----------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE7H DAY OF JANUARY201417TH POUSHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 3 of 2014 (Z) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA28102013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED0512-2013 PETITIONER(S)/APPLICANTS:-: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. RASHEED K. KILAYAYIL, AGED45YEARS S/O.KUNJISUPPI, LECTURER, DIET, CURRICULAM MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION (CMDE) DIET, RAMAVARMAPURAM P.O., THRISSUR. NOW ON DEPUTATION AS DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICER, SSA KOZHIKODE, RESIDING AT POOTHERIVALAPPU, THAZHE CHELARI, VELIMUKKU P.O., MALAPPURAM - 676 317.2. GOPINATHAN K.P., AGED48YEARS S/O.T.P.KRISHNAN NAMBIAR, LECTURER PSTE MALAYALAM DIET KANNUR AT THALASSERY - NOW ON DEPUTATION AS DISTRICT PROGRAMME OFFICE SSI, KANNUR - RESIDING AT SREELAYAM, THAVAROOL CHENGALAYI P.O., SREEKANDAPURAM, KANNUR - 670 631...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): 1. The applicant of this OA is an officer of Delhi and Andaman Nicobar Islands Civil Service (DANICS, in short), who is before us with the following prayers:- (a) direct the respondents to consider and promote the applicant on adhoc basis to the excadre post equivalent of DANICS w.e.f. 19.10.2011 and if in the event he is not found fit on the said date, then w.e.f. 14.11.2012 with all consequential benefits and grant all benefits consequent thereto to the applicant as being given to his juniors consequent to their promotion vide order dated 19.10.2011 or 14.11.2012 (as the case may be). (b) award costs of the proceedings and (c) pass any other order/direction which this Honble Tribunal deem fit and proper in favour of the applicant and against the respondents in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The applicant was initially appointed as Grade-II/Delhi Administration Subordinate Services (DASS, in short) on 14.08.1986. He was promoted to DASS Grade-I o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN MONDAY,THE6H DAY OF JANUARY201416TH POUSHA, 1935 OP(C).No. 4658 of 2013 (O) --------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A. 2020/2013 IN L.A.R. 762011 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED0212.2013 PETITIONER: ------------------- GEORGE P.CHERUKOTH AGED57YEARS S/O. LATE C.PAULOSE, CHERUKOTH HOUSE, LAYAM ROAD ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN SRI.P.A.HARISH RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM-682031.2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INFOR PARK, KUSUMAGIRI, KAKKANAD-682030.3. C.V.GOPI S/O. NARAYAN KURUP, 28/1824A, PANDARACHIRA ROAD KADAVANTHRA-682020. R3 BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.LAIJU C. STEPHEN R2 BY SMT.RASHMI. K.V., SC, INFOPARK THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0601-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C).No. 4658 of 2013 (O) -----------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE6H DAY OF JANUARY201416TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 465 of 2014 (G) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- S. JYOTHIS KUMAR, EX-SUBEDAR & HONORARY CAPTAIN JC-438848-X, AGED53YEARS, SON OF K.K. SURENDRAN, RESIDING AT NEELIMA, HOUSE NO.20, CHAITHANYA NAGAR, PALLIKKARA, KALAMASSERY,ERNAKULAM- 683 503, (OCCUPYING122, NAD QUARTERS, NEAR SANTHIGIRI GATE, NAD P.O.,ALUVA -683 565. BY ADV. SRI.R.PUSHPANGATHAN PILLAI. RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI- 110 011.2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, NAVAL ARMAMENT DEPOT, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM.3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, NAVAL ARMAMENT DEPOT, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, A.S.G. OF INDIA. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0601-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:- 06.01.2014 Coram:- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.Raja W.P. Nos.1856 to 1858 of 2013 and M.P. Nos.1 to 4/13, 1 to 3/13 and 1 to 3/13 National Highways Authority of India through Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, No.1, Second Floor, Subramaniapuram 3rd Street, Karaikudi-630 002. ... Petitioner in all Writ Petitions vs. The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. ... R1 in all WPs The Principal Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ... R2 in all WPs The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Madurai Region, Madurai 625 002. ... R3 in Writ Petn No.1856/2013 The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Trichy Region, Trichy 620 020. ... R3 in WPs.1857 and 1858 of 2013. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Water Resources Organisation, Manimuthar Basin Sub-Divisio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-03-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.50 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.4719 of 2010) Praful Manohar Rele Appellant Versus Smt. Krishnabai Narayan Ghosalkar & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 16th October, 2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby the High Court has allowed Civil Second Appeal No.90 of 1992 set aside the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge in Civil Appeal No.33 of 1987 and restored that passed by the Trial Court dismissing Regular Civil Suit No.87 of 1984. The factual backdrop in which the dispute arose may be summarized as under:3. Manohar Narayan Rele owned a house bearing Panchayat No.105 situate in village Ravdanda, Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, in the State of Maharashtra. In RCS No.87 of 1984 filed by the said Shri Rele before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Alibag, the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-03-2014
Amar Saran, J. This appeal was called out in the revised list. Even though, there are a number of counsel, yet none of them has appeared. One counsel Sri Fanish Mishra has sent an illness slip. As there are a number of counsel, we propose to ignore the said illness slip. In Bani Singh v. State of U.P., (1996) 4 SCC, 720, as reiterated in K.S. Panduranga v. State of Karnataka, (2013) 3 SCC 721 it has been held that even in the absence of counsel, who are deliberately not appearing, it will be open to the Court to peruse the record and the judgement of the Trial Court and decide the appeal on merit after hearing the State counsel. The hearing of the appeal cannot be adjourned only for this reason. 2. We have heard learned A.G.A. Sri R. K. Singh and Sri Anand Tiwari and perused the papers of the case. The appellants Bishambar and Chandru have been convicted by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Bijnore and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life under sections 302/34 I.P.C. and three...
Tag this Judgment!