Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10-1-2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.R.K.AGRAWAL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN WRIT PETITION No.496 of 2014 R.Santhosh Kumar .Petitioner vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep. By 1.The Director General of Police State Police Head Quarters Dr. Radhakrishnan Road Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 2.The Inspector of Police (L&O) B15, Rathinapuri Police Station Coimbatore (Crime No.2652/2011) 3.The Inspector of Police (L&O) B7 Ramanathapuram Police Station Coimbatore 641 045 (Crime No.586/2010) 4.The Inspector of Police (Crime) B13, Podanur Police Station Coimbatore 641 023 (Crime No.1303/2013) 5.The Superintendent of Police CB CID3 SIDCo.Electronic Complex I Floor, Guindy Chennai 600 032.Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the fiRs.respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime Nos.2652/2011, 586/2010 and 1303/2013...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Decided on : Jan-10-2014
H.K. Thakur, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against OIA No. 60/2009(STC)/LMR/Commr(A)/Ahd dt 27.2.2009/5.3.2009. Facts of the case are that appellant is engaged in providing services of Security Agency and holds a Service Tax Registration. During a scrutiny of the records maintained by the appellant for the period 2002-03 to 2004-05, it was found that there was a difference in the amounts reflected in the profit and loss account of the appellant and the ST-3 returns filed with the revenue. Show cause notice for the period 2002 to March 2005 was issued to the appellant on 26/9/2007 which was decided by Jt Commissioner, S.T., Ahmedabad under OIO No. STC/87/Joint Commr/08 dt 20/2/08 confirming demand of Rs 14,87,288/- alongwith interest. Penalties were also imposed under Sec. 76 and 78 of the Customs Act 1994. An appeal against the said OIO dt 20/2/2008 was filed before the First Appellate Authority which was rejected by Commissioner (A) under OIA dt 27.2.2009/5.3.09 ag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN THURSDAY, THE9H DAY OF JANUARY201419TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 13223 of 2007 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- 1. UNNIKRISHNAN.A., REP.BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, AJAYAKUMAR BHARGAVI BHAVAN, VADAKKUMTHALA P.O., KARUNAGAPALLY.2. VISHNU.P.G., REP.BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, GOVINDA PILLAI, POURNAMI PADINJATTAKKARA, THEVALAKKARA, KOLLAM.3. MUHAMMED NAZARUDEEN SAHIB.S., REP.BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, SHAMSUDEEN SAHIB.M. PUTHEN PURAYIL VARAVILA P.O., VIA. VAVAKKAVU, KOLLAM.4. CHITHRA BHANU.S., REP.BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, S.K.SURENDA BABU KAVUNGAL VILAYIL VEEDU, CHANDANA THOPPE P.O. KOTTANKARA, KOLLAM.5. SANOFAR.A., REP.BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, ALIYAR.M.KANJIRAM VILLA VEEDU CHANDANA THOPPE P.O., KERALAPURAM, KOLLAM.6. SHAMEER.S., REP.BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN, S.A.SALIM, SHANU COTTAGE TKMC.P.O.,ARICODE, KOLLAM.7. NISTHAR HASSAN.A., REP. BY NEXT FRIEND A...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
CRA No.D-229-DBA of 2001 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.D-229-DBA of 2001 Date of decision: January 09, 2014 State of Punjab .................Appellant versus 1. Budh Singh son of Hari Singh son of Hakam Singh, aged 74 years, agriculturist, resident of Indra Basti Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur (dead, appeal abated against him in terms of Section 394 (1) Cr.P.C. vide order dated 09.09.2013).2. Jagrup Singh son of Budh Singh,, aged 31 years, agriculturist, resident of Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur 3. Manmeet Singh son of Daljit Singh, aged 26 years, agriculturist resident of Ram Nagar, Sunam, District Sangrur. .............Respondents. Criminal Revision No.455 of 2001 Date of decision: January 09, 2014 Hardev Singh son of Bant Singh, resident of village Higarwal, District Sangrur .................Petitioner versus 1. The State of Punjab 2. Budh Singh son of Hari Singh son of Hakam Singh, aged 74 Sunder Sham years, agriculturist, resident of In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE9H DAY OF JANUARY201419TH POUSHA, 1935 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 166 of 2011 -------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN CC13712009 ofJUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, KOLLAM, DATED0212-2010 ---------- REVISION PETITIONER(S)/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.ROY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED: ----------------------------------------- 1. K.THANKAPPAN UNNITHAN, S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI, KAROTTUPILLAI VEEDU, KODAVILA P.O., EAST KALLADA.2. SHIBU @ SHIBU THAMBAN, S/O. MURALEEDHARAN, THOTTINPURAYIL VEEDU, KODAVILA P.O., EAST KALLADA.3. AJITH PRASAD, S/O. NARAYANAN, AARAAMAM, CHITTUMAALA, SOUTH MURI, EAST KALLADA.4. SHAJI, S/O. CLETUS, ANUGRAHA, -DO- -DO- 5. SADANANDAN, S/O. PATTAUIL KUNJU KUNJU, CONTRACTOR, AAMBADI, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.6...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-09-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filled under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed in Writ Petition No.10744/2010 (L-K) dated 13.08.2010.) D.H. Waghela, C.J. Oral: 1. The appellant, a workman employed under the respondent -State Transport Corporation (KSRTC, Chickmagalur), has called into question the order dated 13.08.2010 in Writ Petition No.10744/2010 of learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby the petition of the appellant was partly allowed, so as to modify the award of the Industrial Tribunal, partly holding in favour of the appellant. 2. The interesting facts, in brief, of the case of the appellant are that he was employed as a Conductor under the respondent and after nearly 11 years of service, he was compulsorily retired on 07.03.2001 on the ground of surgical amputation of his leg due to which, he had remained absent from 03.04.2000 to 30.09.2000. According to the respondent, the appellant was admitted to hospital due to pain in his l...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
Ashok Bhushan, J. These two writ petitions filed by the same petitioners have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in Writ Petition No.48250/2013, which is being treated as leading writ petition. Brief facts giving rise to both the writ petitions are: The petitioner no.1 is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956, and has been carrying out its activities since 1995. The petitioners' company suffered heavy losses in the financial year 2008-09 and 2009-2010. A reference under Section 15 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter called the "Act, 1985") was made by the petitioners Company before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (hereinafter called the "BIFR") in the Month of October, 2010. The reference was registered as BIFR Case No. 53/2010. The Board proceeded with the reference and called for certain informations and in its proceedings da...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
CWP No.13887 of 2013 (O& M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.13887 of 2013 (O& M) Date of decision:08. 01.2014 Block Development and Panchayat Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Lambi ...Petitioner(s) Versus Balbir Singh and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.(Oral) C.M. No.16071 of 2013 Application for placing on record statement and affidavit of Naval Ram, BD & PO as Annexures P-4 and P-5 is allowed. The said Annexures are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. CWP No.13887 of 2013 Challenge in the present writ petition is to the award dated 08.04.2013 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Bathinda whereby, respondent No.1-Balbir Singh has been ordered to be reinstated in the job at the same post on the same terms and conditions on which he was already working with the management. The Industrial Tribunal also gav...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE8H DAY OF JANUARY201418TH POUSHA, 1935 OP(KAT).No. 5 of 2014 (Z) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA27122013 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVETRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED2511-2013 ........................................ PETITIONER(S) : ---------------------- DR.SANKAR MOHAN B.A.M.S., AGED28YEARS, S/O.DR.G.MOHANAN, "SANTHWANAM" HOUSE, N.H.47, OPP. TO"HOTEL MITHILA BAR", ERAMALLOOR P.O., ALLEPPEY DISTRICT - 688 537., KERALA. BY ADVS.SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.) M/S.MOTILAL LAW CHAMBERS SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR (RAVIPURAM) RESPONDENT(S) : --------------------------- 1. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K.P.S.C., PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695 001. R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAATERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY,THE8H DAYOF JANUARY201418TH POUSHA, 1935 Ins.APP.No. 72 of 2011 ( ) --------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN IC222005 of E.I.COURT,KOLLAM DATED12-10-2010 APPELLANT/APPLICANT: ------------------------------------- F.BASHEER, SAPNA, PERUMATHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR.ADV.SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR ADVS.SRI.LEO GEORGE SRI.K.N.SASIDHARAN NAIR SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR SRI.M.SUNIL RESPONDENTS/OPPOSITE PARTIES: -------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION PANCHDEEPBHAVAN, NORTH SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR-20.2. M.HABEEBULLAH, C/O.BASHEER, SAPNA, PERUMATHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 032. R-1 BY ADV. SRI.P.SANKARANKUTTY NAIR, SC, ESI CORPN THIS INSURANCE APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0301-2014, THE COURT ON0801-2014 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AV C.R. S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN,J.========================...
Tag this Judgment!