Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:- 5th February, 2014 + CRIMINAL APPEAL4131998 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellant Through Mr. G.S. Sharma and Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.The third appellant, namely, Om Prakash @ Bengali brother of the other two appellants Sunil Kumar and Om Babu @ Pappu expired during the pendency of the present appeal. The present appeal, therefore, has been pressed on behalf of Sunil Kumar and Om Babu @ Pappu.2. The two appellants along with the deceased appellant Om Babu @ Pappu by the impugned judgment dated 17th September, 1998 stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Tejpal at about 8.00-8.30 p.m. on 2nd October, 1992. By order of sentence dated 19th September, 1998, the two appellants have been sentenced to life ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
1. Appellant Pappu Kumar Mandal has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 20 of the NDPS Act vide judgment dated 31.10.2013 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years as well as also fined of Rs.1,00000/- in default thereof to undergo R.I. for two years vide order dated 12.11.2013 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge under NDPS Act, Khagaria in Special Case No.02 of 2010 arising out of Naugachhia Rail P.S.Case No.09 of 2010. 2. The case of the prosecution in brief as per self statement of ASI Bhagwan Prasad Singh(P.W.2) drawn on 31.03.2010 is that during course of escort of 322 Dn. along with police personnel they have perceived suspicious activity of a passenger who attempted to conceal a bag and Jhola over which he was interrogated. He disclosed his identity as Pappu Kumar Mandal. On query with regard to bag and Jhola, he became perplexed and tried to flee. In presence of escort party, the bag and Jhola was searched. From bag three packets of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: February 4, 2014 + RC.REV. 88/2012 & C.M. No.3384/2012 SUNIL SRIVASTAVA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Misra, Adv. versus ARUN NAYYAR Through ..... Respondent Mr.Abhas Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has assailed the eviction order dated 9th December, 2011, passed by Additional Rent Controller, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of two rooms alongwith kitchen, bathroom and toilet on the 2nd floor of property bearing No.12-A/38, WEA Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as tenanted premises) which was let out to the petitioner by father of the respondent for residential purpose. The respondent alleged himself to be ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE4H DAY OF FEBRUARY201415TH MAGHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 2847 of 2014 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------- THE PRINCIPAL, A.V.ABDURAHIMAN HAJI ARTS & SCIENCE COLLEGE P O PAYYOLI ANGADI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673523. BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.S.M.PRASANTH SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ SRI.M.MANOJKUMAR (CHELAKKADAN) SMT.ASHA BABU SMT.AMMU CHARLES RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAYYOLI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673523.2. SRI.T.K.A.LATHEEF, PRESIDENT, KERALA STATE MUSLIM YOUTHJ LEAGUE MEPPAYYUR PANCHAYATH COMMITTEE, A V SOUDHAM, MAIN ROAD MEPPAYYUR-673524. BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SUJITH MATHEW JOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON0402-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 2847 of 2014 (E) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE4H DAY OF FEBRUARY201415TH MAGHA, 1935 AS.No. 296 of 2002 ( ) ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS11581995 of II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM ======================= APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:: ------------------------------------------ 1. SOUDAMINI, AGED51YEARS, W/O. LATE VENUGOPALAN RESIDING AT SHINY NIVAS, (PALLICKAPARAMBIL) ALAPPATT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI.2. P.V.SHINY, D/O. LATE VENUGOPALAN AGED23YEARS, SHINY NIVAS (PALLICKAPARAMBIL) ALAPPATT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:: ------------------------------------------- 1. VISAMBHARAN, AGED59 NOBIL VIHAR EDAPPALLY TOLL, THRIKKAKARA NORTH, KOCHI-24.2. MRS.NIRMALA ULLASKUMAR D/O. LATE RAMAN, AGED39 WARRIAM VEEDU NAMBIAPURAM ROAD, PALLURUTHI. R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.C.K.ARAVINDAKSHA MENON SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY SRI.KUMARASWAMY SARMA K.N. SRI.PRAKASH P.GEORGE THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 510/2014 & CM No.1024/2014 Date of Decision:4. h February, 2014 YOGENDRA NATH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Prabodh Kumar, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN ..... Respondent Through Mr. S. Rajappa, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner before us assails the order dated 28.05.2013 passed in O.A. No.4605/2011, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi whereby the order dated 07.01.2004 passed by the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan under Article 81(b) of the Education Code, terminating the services of the petitioner and the order of the Appellate Authority dated 21.07.2010 were sustained.2. The facts giving rise to the instant petition are in narrow compass. The petitioner was employed by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS) as a post graduate teacher (English) and at the relevant time, posted...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Singapore Supreme Court
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
Andrew Ang J (delivering the judgment of the court): 1. This is an appeal under s 81(5) of the Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2008 Rev Ed) ("the IT A") against the decision of the High Court judge ("the Judge") dismissing the appeal of the appellant Comptroller ("the Appellant") against the decision of the Income Tax Board of Review ("the Board") in Income Tax Appeal Nos 3 and 4 of 2010. The Board had allowed the appeal of the respondent insurance company ("the Respondent") against revised assessments raised on it by the Appellant seeking to tax the gains made by the Respondent on the disposal of certain shares ("the Shares") that had been held by the Respondent in its related companies [C], [D] and [E]. 2. The significance of this case lies to some degree in the fact that it is the first local case dealing with the income tax treatment of investment gains accruing to insurance companies. At its core it revolves around the single issue of whether the gains arising from the Respondent's dispo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN MONDAY,THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY201414TH MAGHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 982 of 2014 () -------------------------- CC.NO. 5095/2013 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, IRINJALAKUDA CRIME NO. 905/2013 OF KODAKARA POLICE STATION , THRISSUR DISTRICT ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------------ 1. K.J.NOBLE, S/O.JAYARAJAN,AGED30YEARS, KARYANKATTIL HOUSE,KALLETTUMKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.2. JAYARAJAN, S/O.KOCHUKUTTAN, RESIDING -DO- 3. SUBHADRA, W/O.JAYARAJAN, RESIDING -DO- BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NEEHA HIRAN, D/O.HIRAN, PANAT HOUSE, KOORIKUZHI.P.O., KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. PIN- 680 664.2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKARA POLICE STATION. PIN-680 684.3. STATE, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.PIN-682 031. R1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.902 OF2004Aveek Sarkar & Anr. .. Appellants Versus State of West Bengal & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. A German magazine by name STERN having worldwide circulation published an article with a picture of Boris Becker, a world renowned Tennis player, posing nude with his dark-skinned fiancée by name Barbara Feltus, a film actress, which was photographed by none other than her father. The article states that, in an interview, both Boris Becker and Barbaba Feltus spoke freely about their engagement, their lives and future plans and the message they wanted to convey to the people at large, for posing to such a photograph. Article picturises Boris Becker as a strident protester of the pernicious practice of Apartheid. Further, it was stated that the purpose of the photograph was also to signify that love champions over hatred.2. Sports World, a widely circulated ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % UOI & ANR. FAO No.134/2009 Through:3. d February, 2014 ......Appellants Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Adv. VERSUS RAM CHANDER DECD. THR. LR MAINA DEVI ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal has been filed by the Union of India under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 impugning the order of the Commissioner dated 7.11.2008 by which compensation was granted on account of injuries to a casual workman Sh. Ram Chander who was working as a gangman with the Railways. I may note that Sh. Ram Chander has since expired and now he is being represented by his legal heirs.2. The impugned orders in this case are dated 7.11.2008 and the subsequent order dated 19.1.2009 enforcing the impugned judgment dated 7.11.2008.3. Before me, counsel for the appellant has argued two aspects. First is that ...
Tag this Judgment!