Skip to content


Making Up - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.204 seconds)
Jan 02 2007 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Godfrey Phillips India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-02-2007

Reported in: (2007)(117)ECC109

the appellant 8 section 96 and 100 of the cpc make provision for an appeal being preferred from every original decree

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 2007 (TRI)

Suvikram Plastex (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-08-2007

Reported in: (2008)(225)ELT282Tri(Bang.)

raw material supplied and these hdpe tapes were used for making woven fabrics etc it is on record that the appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2007 (TRI)

Autoprint Machinery Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Nov-02-2007

Reported in: (2008)10STR39

4 in the above circumstances the appellants will have to make a reasonable pre deposit accordingly i direct them to pre

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2007 (TRI)

Macmillan India Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-30-2007

Reported in: (2008)(125)ECC265

2003 wherein it has been clarified that when an importer makes a request to permit re export of the goods under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 22 2007 (TRI)

Flow Tech Power Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Oct-22-2007

Reported in: (2008)(125)ECC62

..... to refund was held to be impermissible the appellate authority had directed the authorities to make the refund involved there is no such order in this case we allow the appeal ..... requirement under modvat scheme in his view the eligibility of modvat credit could be taken up only while sanctioning the refund and the same had not merged with earlier orders as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 25 2007 (TRI)

Bax Global India Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-25-2007

Reported in: (2008)12STJ250CESTAT(Bang.)alore

..... the services are rendered by the third party and the appellants initially make payment for the activities on behalf of the client and later ..... the category of cha services similarly we have seen the break up of all other services it was already pointed out by the ..... of the view that the impugned order is not sustainable summing up we find that the appellants had already discharged the duty liability .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 2007 (TRI)

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Wintac Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-31-2007

Reported in: (2008)13STT146

rendering these three services at this juncture i have to make certain observation about the quality of the show cause notice

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 2007 (TRI)

Shree Percoated Steels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-15-2007

Reported in: (2007)(123)ECC328

would arise warranting acceptance of prayer of the revenue to make a reference to this court under section 35g of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 2007 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Nahar Exports Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-11-2007

Reported in: (2008)(125)ECC48

provider of taxable service there would be no need for making a provision for such a person by way of a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2007 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Silver Oak Gardens Resort

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-02-2007

Reported in: (2008)9STR481

finding and there being no reasonable cause for failure to make payments penalty under section 78 was clearly warranted the adjudicating

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //