Skip to content


Making Up - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 509 results (0.103 seconds)
Dec 04 1933 (FN)

Miller Vs. Union Pacific R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-04-1933

..... these and like possibilities were to be estimate by the triers of the facts they make it impossible to deal with the issue as a question for the court bradley v ..... view being unobstructed the chauffeur also saw it and was governing himself accordingly so that up to the very time that the truck approached the main track he wright may have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 1933 (PC)

P.C. Kandaswami Pillai and ors. Vs. Narayana Aiyar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-17-1933

Reported in: 150Ind.Cas.1134

..... stating that he has an undivided half share in items nos 11 to 61 and making reference to the preliminary decree for partition passed in o s no 82 of 1925 ..... be invalid the facts of this case are that a large number of items put up for sale were the subject of a suit for partition between the 1st defendant and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1933 (PC)

Taraprasanna Ganguly and ors. Vs. Naresh Chandra Chakrabarty and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-25-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal329

the record of the appeal after time does not really make the representation any the less effective i am therefore of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1933 (PC)

Dharanidhar Roy Vs. P.D. Sethi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-24-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal379

mortgage debt and raja bon behari singh the mortgagor from making payment thereof until the further order of the court to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 1933 (PC)

Nutbehari Sarkar Vs. Saroda Prosad Chowdhury and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-15-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal358

..... able to do so i think it is clear that the order that he did make was wrong he could not have acted under section 258 criminal p c because charges ..... due to the fact that the settlement had materialized and that the parties had made up their differences accordingly he dealt with the case under section 258 criminal p c and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1933 (PC)

Ambika Charan De and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-10-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal361

refused to take any part in the proceedings or to make any statements the evidence therefore proving the facts which i

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 09 1933 (PC)

Muhamad Sahoob Levai Sayabu Vs. Mayamad Ammal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-09-1933

Reported in: 145Ind.Cas.968

..... decree was passed on october 2 1921 declaring these shares and directing a commissioner to make a partition by metes and bounds of the properties among the parties according to their ..... final decree in this case as printed at page 4 of the paper was drawn up according to directions contained in order xxvi rule 14 and the forms printed for use .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1933 (PC)

Bala Venkatarama Chetty Vs. Angathayammal and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-18-1933

Reported in: 146Ind.Cas.204

..... saying that an order by him in an enquiry which he has no power to make such as the present will be validated by consent of parties 10 so limited is ..... dispose of a matter falling under section 53 it cannot by taking the same matter up under section 4 refuse to deal with it in that case it was held that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 1933 (PC)

M.P. Venkatachari Vs. Karuppan Chetty and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-25-1933

Reported in: 150Ind.Cas.1126

..... if any encumbrance not disclosed to the plaintiff should be found to exist the mortgagors make themselves liable for all the losses arising therefrom 5 this clause does not in our ..... this appeal is dismissed with costs of plaintiff 1st respondent mortgage subrogation puisne mortgagees paying up prior mortgage before execution of his mortgage deed rijht to subrogation implied agreement the equitable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 1933 (PC)

Manmathanath Kundu and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-09-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal401

to transfer any case from any such court or to make any order under section 491 of the code or have

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //