Making Up - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.196 seconds)indag Rubber Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-2005
..... may be due to various factors hence even on merits the respondent has failed to make out a case for refund since relevant factors stated above have not been examined by ..... they were paying duty at the lower rate we find that this issue had come up before the hon ble supreme court in the case of cce mumbai v allied photographics .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Airport
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-2005
special shape for use as replacements in industrial furnaces for making of steel the ground for denial is that the refractory
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.M. Pens International Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. (Sea-port)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-18-2005
Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT180TriDel
have already extracted that rule a perusal of that rule makes it clear that the prohibition sought to be read into
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBusiness Combines Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-15-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT67Tri(Mum.)bai
..... no allegation of the two or more lots so alleged to have been mixed to make up the quantity lost due to segregating have been procured at different values of duty payment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCona Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-15-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT208Tri(Mum.)bai
..... would definitely be held to have caused a prejudice to the notice to make an effective defence and in facts of this case coupled with no effective ..... 24 5 2005 after waiver of pre deposit when the stay application came up on 20 5 2005 1 2 after hearing both sides in detail on ..... appellants were claiming benefit of notification 56 95 ce 8 96 ce etc up to 1 4 97 on isi marked good being made without use of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Usha Conductors (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jul-14-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT378Tri(Bang.)
sub section 2 the adjudicating authority or the authorized officer makes an application to the appellate tribunal or the commissioner appeals
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Himalaya Drug Company Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jul-08-2005
Reported in: (2005)(189)ELT471Tri(Bang.)
some perfume to get rid of unpleasant odour will not make theimpugned goods perfumed hair oils as per heading no 3305
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Edhayam Frozen Foods
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-08-2005
Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT72Tri(Chennai)
..... authority act mpeda act for short the apc act was enacted with the object of making better financial provision for the indian council agricultural research the mpeda act was made to ..... to the customs tariff act 1975 thus section 5a of the apc act has set up a bridge to the customs tariff act if that be so it may not be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTContinental Coffee Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-07-2005
Reported in: (2005)(103)ECC113
..... be of no value if it could not be made functional to make the plant operational licence and technical know how had to be ..... orders all the capital goods equipments so imported were used for setting up the instant coffee manufacturing plant the technology purchased by m s ..... s ccl through their letter dated 2 3 2001 furnished a split up of the know how fee to the adjudicating authority showing the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProcter and Gamble Hygine and Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-18-2005
Reported in: (2006)(197)ELT367Tri(Mum.)bai
..... settled that a little difference in facts or additional facts may make a lot of difference in the presidential value of a decision ..... contract for registration for import of goods pertains to initial setting up of a plant for manufacture of vicks vaporub it is the ..... fertilizer plan to be regarded as auxiliary equipment for initial setting up in the said case hon ble tribunal observed that a fertilizer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial