Skip to content


Making Up - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.196 seconds)
Jan 03 2005 (TRI)

indag Rubber Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-03-2005

..... may be due to various factors hence even on merits the respondent has failed to make out a case for refund since relevant factors stated above have not been examined by ..... they were paying duty at the lower rate we find that this issue had come up before the hon ble supreme court in the case of cce mumbai v allied photographics .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2005 (TRI)

Mahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Airport

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-07-2005

special shape for use as replacements in industrial furnaces for making of steel the ground for denial is that the refractory

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2005 (TRI)

G.M. Pens International Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. (Sea-port)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-18-2005

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT180TriDel

have already extracted that rule a perusal of that rule makes it clear that the prohibition sought to be read into

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Business Combines Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-15-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT67Tri(Mum.)bai

..... no allegation of the two or more lots so alleged to have been mixed to make up the quantity lost due to segregating have been procured at different values of duty payment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2005 (TRI)

Cona Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-15-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT208Tri(Mum.)bai

..... would definitely be held to have caused a prejudice to the notice to make an effective defence and in facts of this case coupled with no effective ..... 24 5 2005 after waiver of pre deposit when the stay application came up on 20 5 2005 1 2 after hearing both sides in detail on ..... appellants were claiming benefit of notification 56 95 ce 8 96 ce etc up to 1 4 97 on isi marked good being made without use of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Usha Conductors (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-14-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT378Tri(Bang.)

sub section 2 the adjudicating authority or the authorized officer makes an application to the appellate tribunal or the commissioner appeals

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Himalaya Drug Company Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jul-08-2005

Reported in: (2005)(189)ELT471Tri(Bang.)

some perfume to get rid of unpleasant odour will not make theimpugned goods perfumed hair oils as per heading no 3305

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Edhayam Frozen Foods

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-08-2005

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT72Tri(Chennai)

..... authority act mpeda act for short the apc act was enacted with the object of making better financial provision for the indian council agricultural research the mpeda act was made to ..... to the customs tariff act 1975 thus section 5a of the apc act has set up a bridge to the customs tariff act if that be so it may not be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 2005 (TRI)

Continental Coffee Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-07-2005

Reported in: (2005)(103)ECC113

..... be of no value if it could not be made functional to make the plant operational licence and technical know how had to be ..... orders all the capital goods equipments so imported were used for setting up the instant coffee manufacturing plant the technology purchased by m s ..... s ccl through their letter dated 2 3 2001 furnished a split up of the know how fee to the adjudicating authority showing the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2005 (TRI)

Procter and Gamble Hygine and Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-18-2005

Reported in: (2006)(197)ELT367Tri(Mum.)bai

..... settled that a little difference in facts or additional facts may make a lot of difference in the presidential value of a decision ..... contract for registration for import of goods pertains to initial setting up of a plant for manufacture of vicks vaporub it is the ..... fertilizer plan to be regarded as auxiliary equipment for initial setting up in the said case hon ble tribunal observed that a fertilizer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //