Making Up - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 500 results (0.125 seconds)Fortson Vs. Morris
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-12-1966
..... a legislative election footnote 2 3 it is whether the legislature may make the final choice when the election has been entrusted to the people ..... since 1824 and was readopted by the people in 1945 it set up two ways to page 385 u s 234 select the governor the ..... be finally completed until the winner has taken the oath of office up to then the vacancy which occasioned the election has not been filled .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGangadharan Vaidyan (V.) (Proprietor, Swatantra Pharmacy) Vs. Regional ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-15-1966
Reported in: (1966)IILLJ216Ker
proper 7 the original petition fails and is dismissed i make no order as to costs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhavan and ors. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-04-1966
Reported in: (1967)ILLJ765Ker
..... notification can only mean the day defined in rule 24 section 13 1 does not make it obligatory for the appropriate government to fix the number of working hours per day ..... under section 30 2 g of the act and if it is necessary to link up dearness allowance with a normal working day it is obvious that the day of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamuel (M.J.) Vs. Chief Conservator of Forests and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-24-1966
Reported in: (1967)ILLJ342Ker
..... or tribunal appointed by the government for the purpose or a tribunal generally appointed for making enquiries into the conduct of government servants the above provisions are followed by an explanation ..... for any offence for which the owner of a mine is punishable that provision came up for consideration before the supreme court in chief inspector of mines and anr v lala .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVelukutty Vs. Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-15-1966
Reported in: [1967]20STC28(Ker)
act 14 of 1947 finality attaches to it on the making of the order even if there be in law any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMeera Pillay Mohammed Kunju Katuvankal Puthen Veedu Vs. Subramania Iye ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-22-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Ker223
..... fresh opportunities to adduce evidence the civil revision petition is allowed as indicated above i make no order as to costs 7 the execution court will expedite the trial of the ..... is directed against these concurrent orders 2 the properties belonging to the revision petitioner came up for sale on 9 12 1963 when he prayed for two months time by filing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.V. Muhammed Vs. the Collector of Palghat
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-25-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Ker254; [1967]19STC475(Ker)
it necessary to do so 2 the state government may make rules regulating the manner in which warrants under sub section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Kerala Vs. K. Chekkootty
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-03-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Ker197; 1967CriLJ1332
attestors sometimes it happens that on questioning the accused he makes a statement which gives information to tie police officer which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPetta Alias Pattabi Vs. the Food Inspector and anr.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-08-1966
Reported in: AIR1967Ker192; 1967CriLJ1328
coffee club is ununderstandable the plea that he wanted to make sure that the milk was for sale to the coffee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlantation Corporation of Kerala, Ltd. (by Managing Director) Vs. Puru ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-03-1966
Reported in: (1967)ILLJ503Ker
same the only reason given in ex m 7 for making the cut is that the workers in the kodumon plantations
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial