Making Up - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.118 seconds)Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-2002
Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT182TriDel
lower authority in his order 5 the appellants are however making a further submission that the refund claim relates to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEimco-kcp Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-16-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC307
..... times the torque or the force required for rotary motion is the same and the make arms are rotated at the same speed the torque required will vary from equipment to ..... as well as those advanced by the advocate during the heading the first issue taken up by the appellants is that the assistant commissioner has taken the torque range from 0 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHmt Watch Factory I and Ii Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Aug-23-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC95
..... not been able to discharge the burden cast upon them this judgment is also in making the judgment the tribunal had relied upon an earlier judgment in the case of hindustan ..... knowledge of the department at all times but even then the department does not follow up with an enquiry they did not issue show cause notice to sunil kothari nor did .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinwool Rock Fibres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC336
the central excise schedule follow rule 1 what rule 1 makes clear is that classifications shall be determined according to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommercial Steel Engg. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2002
Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC376
..... that the orders were passed in respect of the first notice on 14 9 90 making it very clear that on merits the products attracted central excise duty under chapter heading ..... excise patna had passed an order dated 14 9 90 when that order was taken up in appeal the tribunal passed an order of remand and the commissioner had held in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-21-2002
Reported in: (2004)(161)ELT251Tri(Mum.)bai
or proforma credit and to notification 121 94 and to make submissions on limitation within a month from the receipt of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWoodmen Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Aug-21-2002
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT787Tri(Kol.)kata
..... the appellants from their buyer company and apart from the bills amount they were also making realisation in cash on the above basis they were issued a show cause notice proposing ..... stand waived and its recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal matter to come up for ascertaining compliance and final disposal of appeal on 22nd october 2002
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBenadict Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-2002
act were not specifically conferred upon the superintendent it would make no difference the statement made by the appellant continues to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. Avon Beauty Products (i) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2002
Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC522
..... not following the legal requirement would make the products non marketable ld counsel submits that similar issue came up before the tribunal in the case ..... appeals in the impugned order has observed as the samples put up before me show that the label affixed by the appellants on ..... not contain all the details which are needed to be put up on labels i do not consider that the activity undertaken by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUniversal Radiators Ltd. and Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-23-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC294
..... supplied to battle tanker are eligible for the claim although the appellant had overlooked to make the claim on this aspect but the tribunal is entitled to examine this issue and ..... and after perusal of the entire order we notice that the case has been built up on the basis of investigation the department has relied on the statements of m s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial