Skip to content


Making Up - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 600 results (0.118 seconds)
Jan 01 2002 (TRI)

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT182TriDel

lower authority in his order 5 the appellants are however making a further submission that the refund claim relates to the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2002 (TRI)

Eimco-kcp Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-16-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC307

..... times the torque or the force required for rotary motion is the same and the make arms are rotated at the same speed the torque required will vary from equipment to ..... as well as those advanced by the advocate during the heading the first issue taken up by the appellants is that the assistant commissioner has taken the torque range from 0 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Hmt Watch Factory I and Ii Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC95

..... not been able to discharge the burden cast upon them this judgment is also in making the judgment the tribunal had relied upon an earlier judgment in the case of hindustan ..... knowledge of the department at all times but even then the department does not follow up with an enquiry they did not issue show cause notice to sunil kothari nor did .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Minwool Rock Fibres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC336

the central excise schedule follow rule 1 what rule 1 makes clear is that classifications shall be determined according to the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Commercial Steel Engg. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

Reported in: (2003)(85)ECC376

..... that the orders were passed in respect of the first notice on 14 9 90 making it very clear that on merits the products attracted central excise duty under chapter heading ..... excise patna had passed an order dated 14 9 90 when that order was taken up in appeal the tribunal passed an order of remand and the commissioner had held in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2002 (TRI)

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-21-2002

Reported in: (2004)(161)ELT251Tri(Mum.)bai

or proforma credit and to notification 121 94 and to make submissions on limitation within a month from the receipt of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2002 (TRI)

Woodmen Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Aug-21-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT787Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the appellants from their buyer company and apart from the bills amount they were also making realisation in cash on the above basis they were issued a show cause notice proposing ..... stand waived and its recovery stayed during the pendency of the appeal matter to come up for ascertaining compliance and final disposal of appeal on 22nd october 2002

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2002 (TRI)

Benadict Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-16-2002

act were not specifically conferred upon the superintendent it would make no difference the statement made by the appellant continues to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 14 2002 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Avon Beauty Products (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC522

..... not following the legal requirement would make the products non marketable ld counsel submits that similar issue came up before the tribunal in the case ..... appeals in the impugned order has observed as the samples put up before me show that the label affixed by the appellants on ..... not contain all the details which are needed to be put up on labels i do not consider that the activity undertaken by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Universal Radiators Ltd. and Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC294

..... supplied to battle tanker are eligible for the claim although the appellant had overlooked to make the claim on this aspect but the tribunal is entitled to examine this issue and ..... and after perusal of the entire order we notice that the case has been built up on the basis of investigation the department has relied on the statements of m s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //