Making Up - Judgment Search Results

Karsan Ambubhai Sindhav Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(5)SCALE189; (1995)1SCC500; [1994]Supp6SCR205; 1995(1)LC643(SC)

order1 this appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the high court of gujarat at ahmedabad in l...

Sita Devi (Smt) (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1995(43)BLJR1086; JT1995(1)SC410; 1994(5)SCALE86; 1995Supp(1)SCC670; [1994]Supp5SCR682

order1 this appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the division bench of the patna high court in...

Vithal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(1)Crimes555(SC); JT1994(1)SC275; 1994(1)SCALE276; 1994Supp(1)SCC639

1 this is an appeal under section 2 a of the supreme court enlargement of criminal appellate jurisdiction act the...

Mckennon Vs. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

as amici curiae 355 ed and supp v the adea makes it unlawful for any employer to discharge any individual or

Jagdeo Das Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

aforementioned facts which seems to be established by evidence would make out a charge of the offence punishable under section 23

State of Meghalaya and ors. Vs. Joinmanick Nosmel Giri

Court: Guwahati

..... a holding inter alia as follows all these facts and circumstances make the m b ext a doubtful and unreliable and so no ..... actual work done by the plaintiff according to the recorded measurement up to march 1976 including preliminary work was rs 3 25 179 ..... paragraph 11 of the judgment of the learned appellate court took up the application of the appellant defendant for adducing the additional evidence .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Turki Hi Alias Kui and anr.

Court: Patna

required for this if the law permits the claimant can make such an application which will be considered by the tribunal

Mohammad NizamuddIn Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Patna

..... accepted that these two letters should be kept out of consideration the same would not make any difference for the simple reason that there is consistent evidence of six witnesses namely ..... m on the basis of which the formal f i r ext 5 was drawn up by manmohan prasad officer incharge of koilwar police station p w 10 4 the investigating .....

Thunder BasIn Coal Co. Vs. Reich

Court: US Supreme Court

..... still find it cheaper to pay minimal civil penalties than to make the capital investments necessary to adequately abate unsafe or unhealthy conditions ..... issue a citation and recommend assessment of a civil penalty of up to 50 000 against any mine operator believed to have ..... time allotted the secretary may assess additional daily civil penalties of up to 5 000 per day pending abatement 820 b the .....

Beecham Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... beecham and jones were each convicted of violating 18 u s c 922 g which makes it unlawful for a convicted felon to possess a firearm title 18 u s c ..... supra at 1334 1335 edwards supra at 1349 1350 then we would have to come up with a special choice of iaw principle for the exemption clause we think the fourth .....