Making Up - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: making up Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 601 results (0.182 seconds)Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-2004
..... argued october 5 2004 decided december 8 2004 petitioner kp permanent make up inc and respondents collectively lasting all use the term micro ..... court of the united states no 03 409 kp permanent make up inc petitioner v lasting impression i inc et al on writ ..... plural in marketing and selling its product petitioner kp permanent make up inc claims to have used the single word version since 1990 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTransweigh (India) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-14-2004
Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT527Tri(Mum.)bai
wherein it has been held that the act does not make any distinction between different categories of service providers be they
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReliance Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: (2004)(174)ELT344Tri(Mum.)bai
..... ispat industries ltd was similar as the importer had failed to make available total expenses incurred on the floating crane as well ..... price between the buyer and the seller to include freight elements up to the destination stipulated in the contracts nothing further is ..... charges incurred in situation where the mother vessel cannot navigate up to the declared place of unloading or does not navigate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Rimmer Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-20-2004
Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC213
are exported to a foreign market as a different product makes no difference the positioning of a product can vary depending
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Genius Leathercraft Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-19-2004
Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC121
bag can be kept on a trolley cart does not make a trolley cart as accessory of such bag for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Vs. Johari Digital Health Care Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-19-2004
Reported in: (2004)(115)LC559Tri(Delhi)
imported by them are classifiable under chapter 85 will not make them ineligible for the benefit of the exemption notification the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFaxtel System (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2004
Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC369
..... to be rejected by applying the ratio of the decision in flock india but we make it clear that we do not express any view on the contention taken by the ..... challenging the order passed by the commissioner appeals rejecting the application for refund had come up for consideration before this larger bench pursuant to reference made by the regular bench under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCeekay DaikIn Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-17-2004
Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT668Tri(Mum.)bai
..... 02 98 due to inability of the transporter viz transport corporation of india tci to make the truck available on 15 02 98 the said goods could not be despatched on ..... could sent the truck only on 16 02 98 the transporter further gave the break up of total 736 cartons loaded with reference to the invoices dated 15 02 98 and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEicher Tractors and anr. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-14-2004
Reported in: (2004)(117)LC709Tri(Delhi)
..... in such cases the appellant contended that they were not required to make any fresh assessment of the inputs so cleared they were only ..... paid on inputs and the requirement under that rule had come up for consideration before the tribunal the tribunal has held that what ..... these appeals involve a common issue therefore they were taken up together for consideration and are disposed of under this common .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajkumar Forge Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT178Tri(Mum.)bai
from what it was without forge and so as to make them identifiable or usable as machine parts concluded that activities
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial