Making Up - Judgment Search Results

Deen Vs. Hickman

Court: US Supreme Court

texas will of course conform to the disposition we now make we do not issue the writ of mandamus mr justice

Seth Badri Prasad and ors. Vs. Seth Nagarmal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC559; [1959]29CompCas229(SC); 1959Supp(1)SCC769; [1959]Supp1SCR769

..... must affect the contract on which the plaintiff is compelled to rely so as to make out his right to what he asks it by no means follows that whenever money ..... a person who has been engaged with another in various dealings and transactions to set up their illegality as a defence to a claim by that other for an account and .....

S. Veerabadran Chettiar Vs. E.V. Ramaswami Naicker and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1958SC1032; 1958CriLJ1565; [1959]1SCR1211

..... justified 5 the petitioner moved the high court for the necessary certificate of fitness for making an appeal to this court the learned judge who had heard the case on merits ..... sanctity and it is no longer an object held scared by anybody sine such given up idols are found in several places of defilement it is not an offence if a .....

Moti Ram Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC63; [1958]34ITR646(SC)

..... decision but this application was dismissed the appellants did not thereafter make any application to the high court under section 66 2 for ..... held that having admitted that the profits in srinagar were mixed up with the working funds the appellant had failed to show that ..... held that having admitted that the profits in srinagar were mixed up with the working funds the appellant had failed to show that .....

Anant Gopal Sheorey Vs. the State of Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1958SC915; 1958CriLJ1429; (1958)IIMLJ207(SC); [1959]1SCR910

nothing in the amending act or the amended code which makes the provision of section 342a inapplicable to criminal proceedings which

Asa Ram Vs. the District Board, Muzaffarnagar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC480; 1959CriLJ533; 1959Supp(1)SCC715; [1959]Supp1SCR715

..... the word committee for the word panchayat is merely a translation as observed earlier it makes no difference to the application of section 93 3 even after 1934 but if it ..... judicial muzaffarnagar who agreed with the view of the magistrate the district board then went up in revision to the high court of allahabad the revision was heard by a learned .....

Alamgir and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC436; 1959CriLJ527; 1959Supp(1)SCC464; [1959]Supp1SCR464

her away if that be so it is difficult to make her consent relevant and decisive in dealing with the cases

Gullapalli Nageswara Rao and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transp ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC308; [1959]Supp1SCR319

transport business this will not preclude the state government from making the necessary enquiry in regard to the objections filed by

R. S. Chiranji Lal and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi, Ajm ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1959]36ITR407(P& H)

for this year was completed on 30th july 1947 in making the assessment of the firms income and profits the income

The ErIn Estate, Galah, Ceylon Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Mad ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1958SC779; [1958]34ITR1(SC); (1958)IIMLJ145(SC); [1959]1SCR573

..... account for the estate are kept in his name and he receives the income and makes the requisite disbursements from time to time 3 the assessment proceedings for the assessment years ..... dismissed by the tribunal under section 66 1 of the act then the commissioner took up the matter to the high court of madras under section 66 2 the high court .....