Skip to content


Interstate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interstate Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 488 results (0.092 seconds)
Mar 03 2004 (HC)

interstate Equipment (India) Private Ltd. Vs. Bharat Aluminum Company ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-03-2004

Reported in: 2004(1)ARBLR456(Delhi); III(2004)BC63; 2004(73)DRJ506

mukundakam sharma j 1 the respondent invited tenders by issuing a notice inviting tender nit dated 30 9 1982 for...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 2004 (HC)

interstate Constructions Vs. Npcc Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-11-2004

Reported in: 2004(3)ARBLR421(Delhi); 114(2004)DLT746

vikramajit sen j 1 the grievance of the petitioner is that due to the obdurate approach of the chairman cum...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2004 (HC)

M.V. Chowdappa Vs. Mohan Breweries and Distilleries Limited and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-19-2004

Reported in: I(2005)ACC337; 2005ACJ644; 2004(4)KarLJ121

s r nayak j 1 the injured person in a motor vehicle accident being dissatisfied with the compensation of rs...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 06 2004 (HC)

M.S.E.S. Attarwala Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-06-2004

Reported in: 2004(3)KLT105

..... manji unani rs 15 228 007524 28 1 00 padmashi medicinesurumawalain the following two transactions interstate purchases effected by the assessee by issuing form c declarations were also not seen ..... appellate tribunal the assessee produced certain documents to substantiate the contention that the alleged unaccounted interstate purchases were not real and that the assessee had nothing to do with those .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2004 (HC)

The State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Bihar State Forest Development Cor ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Feb-10-2004

..... to the advocate general jharkhand that if the bihar state forest development corporation was an interstate corporate body then why was a state company incorporated by the government of jharkhand ..... jharkhand submitted that no one had stopped this corporation from continuing its activities as an interstate body corporate section 66 of the bihar reorganisation act 2000 the geographical areas were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

i.T.C. Limited Through Sri Jagdish Singh and anr. with Goodyear India ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jan-15-2004

..... view that there is no direct and immediate restriction of interstate trade commerce or intercourse as a result of the requirement ..... measures to be violated thwarted or evaded through the channel of interstate trade commerce and intercourse unless of course the measures are ..... in respect of goods entering the state in course of interstate trade could also be necessary to distinguish the goods that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 06 2004 (HC)

G.K. Venkatashiva Reddy Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribun ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-06-2004

Reported in: AIR2004Kant458; 2005(1)KarLJ260

..... other per other persons except that sons or otherwise a that existing permit holderson the interstate routes maycontinue to operate such inter state routes subject to the con dition that ..... grantedpermits by the transport authoritieson the date of publication of the modi fied scheme on interstate agreemententered into by the government of anyother state provided that the operator oneach route shall .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2004 (SC)

Godawat Pan Masala Products I.P. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-02-2004

Reported in: AIR2004SC4057; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)970; 2005(1)BomCR194; JT2004(6)SC179; (2004)4MLJ67(SC); 2004(6)SCALE388; (2004)7SCC68; 2004(2)LC1449(SC)

..... central sales tax act by section 14 ix recognises gutka as a legitimate article of interstate trade or interstate sale so is pan masala recognised as such a legitimate article of ..... interstate sale the learned counsel relied on dwarka prasad laxmi narain v the state of u .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2004 (HC)

Omni Forge Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes an ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-23-2004

Reported in: ILR2004KAR4260; (2008)11VST125(Karn)

..... not assist the petitioner 16 forgings are one of the goods of special importance in interstate trade and commerce forgings are specified in section 14 iv vii of the cst act ..... the entry is as under section 14 certain goods to be of special importance in interstate trade or commerce iv iron and steel that is to say i pig iron sponge .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2004 (HC)

Narendra Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-12-2004

Reported in: III(2004)ACC388; RLW2004(4)Raj2549; 2004(3)WLC358

..... 3 2004 annex 7 whereby the respondent no 2 rta granted two permits on the interstate route rajgarh hissar via jhumpa one in favour of the respondent no 3 bharat singh ..... petitioner and the respondents no 3 and 4 applied for grant of permits on the interstate route rajgarh hissar via jhumpa 5 there is also no dispute on the point that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //