Interstate - Judgment Search Results

N.G.E.F. Limited Vs. Assistant Collector of C. Ex., Bangalore

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1997(95)ELT480(Kar)

1 the appellant is a company registered under the companies act and inter alia manufactures transformers electric switch gears switch...

Oklahoma Tax Comm'n Vs. Jefferson Lines, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... central greyhound principle even if doing so requires different treatment for the inherently interstate service of interstate transportation and denies the possibility of having a single formal constitutional rule ..... tends to conjure up allocation by percentages and where taxation of income from interstate business is in issue apportionment disputes have often centered around specific formulas for .....

United States Vs. Lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... intrastate economic activity where we have concluded that the activity substantially affected interstate commerce examples include the regulation of intrastate coal mining hodel supra intrastate ..... findings supporting the otherwise implicit determination that the regulated activity substantially affects interstate commerce once again any appeal these considerations may have depends on ignoring .....

Fulton Corp. Vs. Faulkner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to determine whether it regulates evenhandedly with only incidental effects on interstate commerce or discriminates against interstate commerce oregon waste systems inc v department of environmental quality ..... burdens for purposes of the compensatory tax doctrine p ermitting discriminatory taxes on interstate commerce to compensate for charges purportedly included in general forms of intrastate .....

Allied-bruce Terminix Cos. Vs. Dobson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... parties entered into the contract and accepted the arbitration clause they contemplated substantial interstate activity despite some such activities the court found that these parties contemplated a ..... parties entered into the contract and accepted the arbitration clause they contemplated substantial interstate activity ibid emphasis in original quoting metro industrial painting corp v terminal constr .....

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... respondents focus elsewhere is misplaced while the plurality decision states that congress power under the interstate commerce clause would be incomplete without the power to abrogate that statement is made ..... also we believe misplaced fitzpatrick was based upon a rationale wholly inapplicable to the interstate commerce clause viz that the fourteenth amendment adopted well after the adoption of the .....

United States Vs. Robertson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... affecting commerce provision of rico they would have to meet the requirement of substantially affecting interstate commerce they assuredly 672 per curiam brought the gold mine within 1962 a s alternative ..... criterion of any enterprise engaged in interstate or foreign commerce as we said in american building maintenance a corporation is generally .....

Reynoldsville Casket Co. Vs. Hyde

Court: US Supreme Court

..... enterprises inc 486 u s 888 1988 this court held unconstitutional as impermissibly burdening interstate commerce an ohio tolling provision that in effect gave ohio tort plaintiffs unlimited time ..... tolling provision on which she relied 2305 15 a places an unconstitutional burden upon interstate commerce soon thereafter the ashtabula county court of common pleas finding this case indistinguishable .....

icc Vs. Transcon Lines

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circuit no 93 1318 argued november 1 1994 decided january 10 1995 the interstate commerce act grants petitioner interstate commerce commission icc authority to set the exclusive means by which common ..... the court though recent acts of congress have made substantial changes in the regulation of interstate motor carriers see negotiated rates act of 1993 107 stat 2044 trucking industry regulatory .....

Kansas Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to a case involving 674 syllabus the enforcement of an interstate compact because colorado has failed to prove that kansas lacked ..... concluded that the proper burden of proof for enforcing an interstate compact is the preponderance of the evidence standard report 70 ..... special master concluded that an action seeking to enforce an interstate compact stood on the same footing as an action enforcing .....