Interstate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interstate Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 505 results (0.087 seconds)Smt. Indira Sohan Lal (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-25-1996
Reported in: 1996IXAD(SC)63; AIR1997SC1907; 1996(8)SCALE435; (1997)9SCC83; [1996]Supp8SCR1
1 leave granted2 we have heard learned counsel on both sides 3 notification under section 4 1 of the land...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C.i. and E., Bangalore Vs. Microsign Engineering Products
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-20-1996
Reported in: 1997(94)ELT308(Kar)
1 the instant appeal is filed by the state challenging judgment dated 22 6 1992 passed by the special court...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. International Business Machines Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1996
..... is carried on solely within the state referring to the categorical ban on taxation of interstate commerce declared in robbins we likened the scope of the commerce clause s ban on ..... an analogy in the construction which had been given to the commerce clause in protecting interstate commerce from state legislation imposing direct burdens after thames mersey the commerce clause construction espoused .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrintz Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-03-1996
..... this court has long interpreted the constitution as ceding congress extensive authority to regulate commerce interstate or otherwise i continue to believe that we must temper our commerce clause jurisprudence ..... or prohibit those acts t he commerce clause for example authorizes congress to regulate interstate commerce directly it does not authorize congress to regulate state governments regulation of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWisconsIn Vs. City of New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-10-1996
..... voting districts that had resulted from a state s redistricting decisions whereas montana had challenged interstate disparities resulting from the actions of congress montana supra at 460 we found this ..... significance of the fact that the constitution makes it impossible to achieve population equality among interstate districts as we have noted before the constitution provides that t he number of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorfolk and Western R. Co. Vs. Hiles
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-08-1996
..... hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact and which ..... on automatic couplers and power brakes before the house committee on interstate and foreign commerce 52d cong 1st sess 6 1892 if con ..... on automatic couplers and power brakes before the house committee on interstate and foreign commerce 52d cong 1st sess 11 1892 he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMedtronic, Inc. Vs. Lohr
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-23-1996
..... 1906 a broad prohibition against the manufacture or shipment in interstate commerce of any adulterated or misbranded food or drug see ..... found that the model was substantially equivalent to devices introduced into interstate commerce prior to the effective date of the act and ..... on health and the environment of the house committee on interstate and foreign commerce ser no 94 39 94th cong 1st .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlickman Vs. Wileman Brothers and Elliott, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-02-1996
..... to other policy judgments made by congress appropriate respect for congress power to regulate interstate commerce provides abundant support for the marketing orders constitutionality generic advertising is intended to ..... of the regulation thus if the government were to attack these problems across an interstate market for a given agricultural commodity or group of them the substantiality of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrown Vs. Pro Football, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-27-1996
..... 781 809 810 1946 united states v masonite corp 316 u s 265 275 1942 interstate circuit inc v united states 306 u s 208 226 227 1939 see generally 6 ..... maintaining the status quo were not in the immediate economic self interest of some cf interstate circuit supra at 222 223 6 areeda supra 1425 all this is to say that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. Vs. Nelson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-16-1996
..... commerce among the several states the sherman act applied only to activities in or affecting interstate commerce hopkins v united states 171 u s 578 586 1898 many lawyers and insurance ..... sherman act s scope south eastern underwriters told those professionals that they were wrong about interstate commerce and that the sherman act did apply and south eastern underwriters principle meant consequently .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial