Interstate - Judgment Search Results

Vimal Kumar JaIn Vs. Labour Court, Kanpur and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC384; (1998)IIILLJ537SC; 1987Supp(1)SCC40

ordero chinnappa reddy j 1 we have heard mr garg at length and we are not satisfied that the case...

Amer. Trucking Assns. Vs. Scheiner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... vast majority of passengers who board flights at the airports involved are traveling interstate both interstate and intrastate flights are subject to the same charges furthermore there is ..... fails the third prong of the complete auto standard which prohibits discrimination against interstate commerce notwithstanding legislative legerdemain in the insertion of the obfuscating term deemed pennsylvania .....

Tyler Pipe Vs. Wash. Dept. of Rev.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... receipts tax on the business of selling tangible property at wholesale discriminated against interstate commerce because it exempted local manufacturers the principal question in these consolidated ..... supreme court held that this wholesale tax exemption for local manufacturers discriminated against interstate commerce and therefore violated the commerce clause of the federal constitution columbia .....

Citicorp Indus. Credit Vs. Brock

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sought a temporary restraining order to prohibit ely and petitioner from placing the goods in interstate commerce the district court denied the application for a temporary restraining order but after ..... this broad regulatory purpose the motive and purpose of the present regulation are plainly that interstate commerce should not be made the instrument of competition in the distribution of goods .....

Cts Corp. Vs. Dynamics Corp. of America

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as overseer of corporate governance enacts laws that necessarily affect certain aspects of interstate commerce particularly with respect to corporations with shareholders in other states a state ..... prohibiting certain transactions and regulating others such laws necessarily affect certain aspects of interstate commerce this necessarily is true with respect to corporations with shareholders in states .....

icc Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... retained the authority to regulate the motor carrier segment of intrastate transportation provided by an interstate rail carrier the staggers rail act provides that a state commission may regulate intrastate ..... potential for mischief would not exist in this case by contrast the railroads are interstate carriers whose tofc cofc services include some segments entirely within texas see guide to .....

int'l Paper Co. Vs. Ouellette

Court: US Supreme Court

..... subject to a variety of common law rules established by the different states along the interstate waterways these nuisance standards often are vague and indeterminate footnote 17 the application of numerous ..... preserving the right to seek traditional common law relief the act draws no distinction between interstate and intrastate disputes 505 e states nothing in this section shall restrict any right .....

South Dakota Vs. Dole

Court: US Supreme Court

..... with such restriction since the means chosen by congress to address a dangerous situation the interstate problem resulting from the incentive created by differing state drinking ages for young persons to ..... court asserts the reasonableness of the relationship between the supposed purpose of the expenditure safe interstate travel and the drinking age condition ante at 483 u s 208 the court reasons .....

Welch Vs. Texas Dept. of Highways

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in parden the court also comprehensively reviewed other federal statutes regulating railroads in interstate commerce which used similar terminology it found that we had consistently interpreted those ..... over which the constitution expressly grants authority to the national government foreign and interstate commerce which necessarily encompasses matters of admiralty is obviously such a subject area .....

California Vs. Superior Court

Court: US Supreme Court

..... right to obtain extradition of criminal necessarily qualifies that citizen s right to interstate travel the requirement that fugitivity be established nevertheless has some teeth to ..... certain limited instances the assistance of the federal bureau of investigation in apprehending interstate abductors see generally donigan child custody jurisdiction new legislation reflects public policy against .....