Interstate - Year 1966 - Judgments

Mar 22 1966 (FN)

icc Vs. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-22-1966

..... and in what proceedings a common carrier by rail may challenge an order of the interstate commerce commission awarding reparations to a shipper claiming injury because of the carrier s ..... to cases involving discontinued rather than present rates initially formulated in cases arising under the interstate commerce act the primary jurisdiction doctrine was premised in the early cases on the policy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1966 (FN)

Engineers Vs. Chicago, R.i. and Pac. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-31-1966

..... clauses of the fourteenth amendment and the commerce clause that they discriminated against interstate and favored intrastate commerce because by exempting lines below certain mileages they excluded ..... brotherhood witness testified before the senate commerce committee to an apprehension that the interstate commerce commission if given the power requested would declare states full crew laws .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1966 (FN)

United States Vs. Guest

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-28-1966

..... conspiracy to compel residents of arizona to move out of that state the right of interstate travel was therefore not directly involved whatever continuing validity wheeler may have as restricted to ..... p i the court with one dissent accepted this interpretation of the right of unrestricted interstate movement observing that crandall v nevada supra was inapplicable because inter alia it dealt with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 1966 (FN)

Consolo Vs. Fmc

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-22-1966

..... a direct review proceeding to challenge the adequacy of a reparation award issued by the interstate commerce commission he should be permitted to bring a similar proceeding to challenge the adequacy ..... modifications to the purposes of the shipping act id p 12 footnote 13 unlike the interstate commerce commission situation there is no possibility here that an enforcement action can be joined .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 1966 (FN)

United Gas Pipe Line Vs. Fpc

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-14-1966

..... continental constructed delivery facilities and united provided facilities to receive the gas into its interstate system the contract parties on application to respondent federal power commission fpc were ..... abandoned a service the taking of johnson bayou field gas and its transportation in interstate commerce the statutory necessity of prior commission approval with its underlying findings cannot .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1966 (FN)

United States Vs. Fabrizio

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-12-1966

..... in legitimate businesses footnote 3 since the purpose of congress was to thwart the interstate movement of such paraphernalia the accomplishment of that goal required reaching whoever knowingly ..... carried such materials in interstate commerce footnote 4 appellee s next contention earnestly supported by the state of new .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 1966 (FN)

idaho Sheet Metal Workers Vs. Wirtz

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-04-1966

..... sizable pieces of equipment for five potato processing companies which dehydrate and freeze potatoes for interstate shipment in reply to respondent s claim that it was violating the overtime provisions of ..... on equipment used by five potato processing companies which dehydrate and freeze the potatoes for interstate shipment for its defense idaho sheet denied its workers were engaged in or producing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 1966 (FN)

illinois C. R. Co. Vs. Norfolk and W. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-14-1966

..... district court for the northern district of ohio syllabus appellants seven railroads applied to the interstate commerce commission idd for authority to provide direct service to the lake calumet harbor ..... and chicago south shore and south bend railroads filed october 19 1956 with the interstate commerce commission footnote 9 return of illinois central pennsylvania and the chicago south shore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1966 (FN)

United States Vs. Cook

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-19-1966

..... of individuals and employees of partnership or corporate common carriers the possible burden to interstate commerce or the need for federal jurisdiction to supplement state jurisdiction in view ..... railroad car motortruck steamboat vessel aircraft or other vehicle of such carrier moving in interstate commerce embezzles steals abstracts or willfully misapplies or willfully permits to be misapplied any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1966 (FN)

Seagram and Sons Vs. Hostetter

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-19-1966

..... 9 on many constitutional fronts they contend that its provisions place an illegal burden upon interstate commerce conflict with federal antitrust legislation and thus fall under the supremacy clause and ..... conclude that the provisions of 9 on their face place on unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce the appellants contention that 9 violates the command of the supremacy clause needs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Interstate - Judgment Search Results