Interstate - Judgment Search Results

V. Mookan, Major Vs. Branch Manager, Southern Roadways Ltd. and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1990(60)FLR210]; ILR1989KAR1322; (1991)ILLJ533Kant

d p hiremath j 1 appeal coming up for admission admitted heard on merits 2 the appellant herein is employed...

Ramesh Chand Vs. Prescribed Authority and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC1778; JT1989(3)SC305; 1989(2)SCALE1450; (1989)3SCC558; [1989]3SCR560; 1989(2)LC521(SC)

m h kania j 1 this is an appeal by special leave against a judgment and order dated september 15...

Goldberg Vs. Sweet

Court: US Supreme Court

..... furthermore an apportionment formula based on mileage or some other geographic division of interstate calls would produce insurmountable administrative and technical barriers since such calls involve the ..... technological and legal changes in the telecommunications industry footnote 1 years ago all interstate telephone calls were relayed through electric wires and transferred by human operators working .....

NW Cent. Pipeline Vs. Kans. Corp. Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jurisdiction over the transportation and sale for resale of regulated gas in interstate commerce including interstate pipelines purchasing policies and pricing practices on judicial review a county court ..... factors kansas hugoton gas is substantially dedicated by long term contract to five interstate pipelines including appellant northwest central these pipelines purchase gas from kansas producers for .....

Healy Vs. Beer Institute, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... declaratory ruling regulated out of state transactions constituted economic protectionism and unduly burdened interstate commerce all in violation of the commerce clause on cross motions for summary ..... establishes a substantial disincentive for companies doing business in connecticut to engage in interstate commerce essentially penalizing connecticut brewers if they seek border state markets and out .....

Amerada Hess Vs. Div. of Taxation

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deduction denial might impose on integrated oil companies does not constitute discrimination against interstate commerce appellants operate both in new jersey and outside new jersey similarly ..... oil producers from retailing oil in maryland does not impermissibly burden interstate commerce because independent interstate retailers still may compete with purely local retailers in this respect .....

Cotton Petroleum Corp. Vs. New Mexico

Court: US Supreme Court

..... u s 187 191 d the express language distinct applications and judicial interpretation of the interstate commerce and indian commerce clauses establish that indian tribes may not be treated as states ..... a circumstance any challenge asserting that tribal and state taxes create a multiple burden on interstate commerce should be directed at the state tax which in the absence of congressional ratification .....

PandLE; R. Co. Vs. Ry. Labor Execs.' Ass'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a matter related to a rail carrier providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the interstate commerce commission under this subchapter the commission shall exempt a person class of persons or ..... to review the transaction and correct any problem arising out of the transaction brief for interstate commerce commission 3 4 footnote and citations omitted in the ex parte 392 proceedings the .....

Sable Communications Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dial a porn messages held 1 section 223 b does not unconstitutionally prohibit the interstate transmission of obscene commercial telephone messages the protection of the first amendment does not ..... similarly we hold today that there is no constitutional stricture against congress prohibiting the interstate transmission of obscene commercial telephone recordings we stated in united states v 12 200 .....

Volt Inf. Sciences Vs. Stanford Univ.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the act therefore declares that a written agreement to arbitrate in any contract involving interstate commerce or a maritime transaction shall be valid irrevocable and enforceable save upon such grounds ..... that the faa does not preempt state arbitration rules even as applied to contracts involving interstate commerce when the parties have agreed to arbitrate by those rules to the exclusion of .....