Interstate - Judgment Search Results

H.C. Gargi Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC65; (1987)ILLJ102SC; 1986(2)SCALE380; (1986)4SCC158; 1986(2)LC558(SC)

order1 special leave granted arguments heard 2 in this case the appellant who was an assistant excise taxation officer haryana...

Transcontinental Gas Vs. State Oil Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... identified in northern natural first it disturbs the uniformity of the federal scheme since interstate pipelines will be forced to comply with varied state regulations of their purchasing ..... the exclusion of state regulation footnote 2 4 ferc s remaining jurisdiction to prevent interstate pipelines from fraudulently abusively or otherwise illegitimately passing on higher wellhead prices to ultimate .....

LA. Pub. Svc. Comm'n Vs. FCC

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of both state and federal authorities moreover because the same carriers provide both interstate and intrastate service actions taken by federal and state regulators within their respective ..... state regulation prohibiting subscribers from connecting their own phones unless used exclusively in interstate service upheld since state regulation would negate the federal tariff footnote 5 respondents .....

Maine Vs. Taylor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... satisfies the requirements ordinarily applied under hughes v oklahoma to local regulation that discriminates against interstate trade the statute must serve a legitimate local purpose and the purpose must be ..... but also to laws that respond to legitimate local concerns by discriminating arbitrarily against interstate trade for the evil of protectionism can reside in legislative means as well as .....

Nantahala P. and L. Vs. Thornburg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the scheme of federal regulation since congress intended ferc s allocation of power in wholesale interstate ratemakings to preempt any inconsistent state ratemakings it is ferc s order rather than ..... a ferc filed rate would clearly be inconsistent with the exclusive federal regulatory scheme over interstate wholesale power prices the ferc approved rate at which the middleman purchased power would not .....

Brown-forman Vs. N.Y. State Liq. Auth.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the commerce clause appellant also argued that the affirmation law on its face directly regulated interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause the appellate division of the new york ..... in page 476 u s 580 effect appellant contends that this constitutes direct regulation of interstate commerce the law also disadvantages consumers in other states according to appellant and is therefore .....

Wardair Canada Vs. FlA. Dept. of Rev.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... evansville airport after rejecting a commerce clause attack because the tax did not discriminate between interstate and intrastate commerce congress reacted immediately to our decision by holding hearings on local ..... that congress intended to limit the applicability of 1513 b to state taxation of interstate air commerce while prohibiting taxation of foreign air commerce to the contrary congress was .....

Square D Co. Vs. Niagara Frontier

Court: US Supreme Court

..... without complying with an agreement filed by the bureau with and approved by the interstate commerce commission petitioners sought treble damages measured by the difference between the allegedly higher ..... applicable language of the antitrust laws footnote 15 nothing in the language of the interstate commerce act moreover necessarily precludes a private antitrust treble damages remedy for actions that .....

Preseault Vs. Icc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of 1983 amendments to the national trails system act trails act which authorize the interstate commerce commission icc or commission to preserve for possible future railroad use rights of ..... o connor with whom justice scalia and justice kennedy join concurring petitioners assert that the interstate commerce commission s icc actions prevent them from enjoying property rights secured by vermont .....

Atty. Gen. of N.Y. Vs. Soto-lopez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state s law operates to penalize those persons who have exercised their constitutional right of interstate migration is heightened scrutiny triggered memorial hospital supra at 415 u s 258 quoting ..... directly the question whether page 476 u s 908 the contested laws operated to penalize interstate migration nonetheless the conclusion that they did penalize migration may be inferred from our .....