Interstate - Judgment Search Results

Progressive Construction Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2003)85ITD277(Hyd.)

interest on refund under section 244a appellate authority was of the view that order was passed under section 244a assessing...

Shri Balaji Automobiles Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(83)ECC524

v c daga j 1 the petitioner has filed this petition claiming refund of the amount on admitted facts the...

New York Vs. Ferc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and or controlling facilities used for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce have on file tariffs providing for nondiscriminatory openaccess transmission services notice ..... is clearly distinguishable from this commission s responsibility to ensure open and nondiscriminatory interstate transmission service nothing adopted by the commission today including its interpretation of .....

Yellow Transp., Inc. Vs. Michigan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... public service commission to levy an annual registration fee of 10 per vehicle on interstate motor carrier vehicles and simultaneously endowed the commission with authority to enter into a ..... intermodal surface transportation efficiency act of 1991 istea in that act congress delegated to the interstate commerce commission icc the power to prescribe standards and amendments to standards that would .....

Pierce County Vs. Guillen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... at improving safety in the channels of commerce and increasing protections for the instrumentalities of interstate commerce pp 146 148 certiorari dismissed in part 144 wash 2d 696 31 p 3d ..... at improving safety in the channels of commerce and increasing protection for the instrumentalities of interstate commerce as such they fall within congress commerce clause power 9 accordingly the judgment of .....

Norfolk and Western R. Co. Vs. Ayers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is limited to injuries sustained by railroad employees while the employees are themselves engaged in interstate commerce the provision does not speak to cases in which an injury has multiple ..... 504 1908 predecessor statute declared unconstitutional because it regulated employee injuries not sufficiently related to interstate commerce placed in context the clause does not speak to 161 cases in which .....

Columbus Vs. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... traditional prerogative of the states to delegate their authority to their constituent parts i the interstate commerce act as amended by the federal aviation administration authorization act of 1994 108 stat ..... that the regulation of intrastate transportation of property by the states unreasonably burdened free trade interstate commerce and american consumers pub l 103 305 601 a 1 108 stat 1605 .....

State of Kerala Vs. Palaksha

Court: Kerala

Reported in: I(2003)ACC105

..... the condition that the varied service shall be operated on single point tax basis under interstate agreement and subject to counter signature of the state transport authority kerala the state ..... respondent 5 the respondent was operating his stage carriage on the route mysore mananthawady on interstate permit granted by the state transport authority karnataka he was operating one round trip from .....

Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1975 and precluded the board from selecting remedies pursuant to its own interpretation of the interstate commerce act carpenters v nlrb 357 u s 93 108 110 1958 our decision in ..... 1958 rejecting government position that we should defer to the board s interpretation of the interstate commerce act we did not defer to the government s position in any of these .....

Swierkiewicz Vs. Sorema N. A.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cadc 2000 bennett v schmidt 153 f 3d 516 518 ca7 1998 ring v first interstate mortgage inc 984 f 2d 924 ca8 1993 others however maintain that a complaint must ..... not purport to create an inflexible formulation for a prima facie case ring v first interstate mortgage inc 984 f 2d 924 927 ca8 1993 t o measure a plaintiff s .....